Cited by 66Diverse Music Education InsightsNeuroscience and Music PerceptionMusic Education and Analysis

Formal string instrument training in a class setting enhances cognitive and sensorimotor development of primary school children

Open access
James, Clara E., Zuber, Sascha, Dupuis-Lozeron, Elise, Abdili, Laura, Gervaise, Diane, Kliegel, Matthias·2020·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract This randomized controlled trial shows for the first time that focused musical instrumental practice as compared to traditional sensitization to music provokes robust cognitive and sensorimotor transfer effects. Over the last two years of primary school (10-12-year-old children), sixty-nine children received biweekly musical instruction by professional musicians within the regular school curriculum. The intervention group learned to play string instruments, whereas the control group, peers in parallel classes, was sensitized to music via listening, theory, and some practice. Broad benefits manifested in the intervention group as compared to the control group for working memory, attention, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, matrix reasoning, sensorimotor hand function and bimanual coordination Apparently, learning to play a complex instrument in a dynamic group setting impacts development much stronger than classical sensitization to music. Our results therefore highlight the added value of intensive musical instrumental training in a group setting, encouraging general implementation in public primary schools, better preparing children for secondary school and for daily living activities. Highlights - Music practice produces multiple cognitive transfer effects in school children - Making music causes stronger cognitive benefits than sensitization to music - Music practice in a class setting improves executive functions and abstract thinking - Playing string instruments enhances fine manual dexterity and bimanual coordination

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2020.00567

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The few studies that assessed longer training periods have shown a greater impact of playing an instrument.

    “The few studies that assessed longer training periods have shown a greater impact of playing an instrument (Costa-Giomi, 1999, 2004: 36 months, mean g = 0.43; James et al., 2020: 48 months, mean g = 0.39; Portowitz et al., 2009: 24 months, mean g = 0.73)”

    From Please don't stop the music: A meta-analysis of the cognitive and academic benefits of instrumental musical training in childhood and adolescence (2022) · cites this paper as James et al., 2020

    The Conclusion reports cognitive and sensorimotor benefits after two years of instrumental training, supporting the general point that an extended training period can have an impact. But the Limitations section says the program would last four years only after a future extension; this study did not assess 48 months. Our copy also does not report a mean g of 0.39 or establish that longer training produced a greater impact than shorter training. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Balbag M. A. Pedersen N. L. Gatz M. (2014). Playing a musical instrument as a protective factor against dementia and cognitive impairment: a population-based twin study. Int. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2014: 836748. 10.1155/2014/836748 25544932 PMC4269311 · DOI
  2. Bean J. (2011). “ Rey auditory verbal learning test, Rey AVLT,” in Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, eds Kreutzer J. S. DeLuca J. Caplan B. (New York, NY: Springer), 2174– 2175. 10.1080/09297040490911078 · DOI
  3. Bergman Nutley S. Darki F. Klingberg T. (2014). Music practice is associated with development of working memory during childhood and adolescence. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7: 926. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00926 24431997 PMC3882720 · DOI
  4. Bugos J. A. Perlstein W. M. Mccrae C. S. Brophy T. S. Bedenbaugh P. H. (2007). Individualized piano instruction enhances executive functioning and working memory in older adults. Aging Ment. Health 11 464– 471. 10.1080/13607860601086504 17612811 · DOI
  5. Carioti D. Danelli L. Guasti M. T. Gallucci M. Perugini M. Steca P. (2019). Music education at school: too little and too late? Evidence from a longitudinal study on music training in preadolescents. Front. Psychol. 10: 2704. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02704 31920782 PMC6930811 · DOI
  6. Chanda M. L. Levitin D. J. (2013). The neurochemistry of music. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17 179– 193. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.007 23541122 · DOI
  7. Corrigall K. A. Schellenberg E. G. (2015). Predicting who takes music lessons: parent and child characteristics. Front. Psychol. 6: 282. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00282 25852601 PMC4371583 · DOI
  8. Corrigall K. A. Schellenberg E. G. Misura N. M. (2013). Music training, cognition, and personality. Front. Psychol. 4: 222. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00222 23641225 PMC3639373 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cortés Pascual A. Moyano Muñoz N. Quílez Robres A. (2019). The relationship between executive functions and academic performance in primary education: review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 10: 1582. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01582 31354585 PMC6638196 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cowan N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 26 197– 223. 10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y 25346585 PMC4207727 · DOI
  11. Dege F. Kerkovius K. (2018). The effects of drumming on working memory in older adults. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/nyas.13685 29727035 · DOI
  12. Dumont E. Syurina E. V. Feron F. J. M. Van Hooren S. (2017). Music interventions and child development: a critical review and further directions. Front. Psychol. 8: 1694. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01694 29033877 PMC5626863 · DOI
  13. Edwards L. J. Muller K. E. Wolfinger R. D. Qaqish B. F. Schabenberger O. (2008). An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Stat. Med. 27 6137– 6157. 10.1002/sim.3429 18816511 PMC2587505 · DOI
  14. Ferreri L. Mas-Herrero E. Zatorre R. J. Ripolles P. Gomez-Andres A. Alicart H. (2019). Dopamine modulates the reward experiences elicited by music. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116 3793– 3798. 10.1073/pnas.1811878116 30670642 PMC6397525 · DOI
  15. Flaugnacco E. Lopez L. Terribili C. Montico M. Zoia S. Schon D. (2015). Music training increases phonological awareness and reading skills in developmental dyslexia: a randomized control trial. PLoS One 10: e0138715. 10.1371/journal.pone.0138715 26407242 PMC4583182 · DOI
  16. Fougnie D. Cockhren J. Marois R. (2018). A common source of attention for auditory and visual tracking. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 80 1571– 1583. 10.3758/s13414-018-1524-9 29717471 PMC6061001 · DOI
  17. Green C. S. Bavelier D. (2008). Exercising your brain: a review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learning. Psychol. Aging 23 692– 701. 10.1037/a0014345 19140641 PMC2896818 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Green C. S. Strobach T. Schubert T. (2013). On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments. Psychol. Res. 78 756– 772. 10.1007/s00426-013-0535-3 24346424 · DOI
  19. Hanna-Pladdy B. Mackay A. (2011). The relation between instrumental musical activity and cognitive aging. Neuropsychology 25 378– 386. 10.1037/a0021895 21463047 PMC4354683 · DOI
  20. Hannon E. E. Trainor L. J. (2007). Music acquisition: effects of enculturation and formal training on development. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11 466– 472. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.008 17981074 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ho Y. C. Cheung M. C. Chan A. S. (2003). Music training improves verbal but not visual memory: cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations in children. Neuropsychology 17 439– 450. 10.1037/0894-4105.17.3.439 12959510 · DOI
  22. James C. E. Zuber S. Dupuis-Lozeron E. Abdili L. Gervaise D. Kliegel M. (2019). Formal string instrument training in a class setting enhances cognitive and sensorimotor development of primary school children. bioRxiv [ Preprint]. 10.1101/829077 PMC7309442 32612501 · DOI
  23. Jaschke A. C. Honing H. Scherder E. J. A. (2018a). Exposure to a musically-enriched environment; Its relationship with executive functions, short-term memory and verbal IQ in primary school children. PLoS One 13: e0207265. 10.1371/journal.pone.0207265 30419066 PMC6231655 · DOI
  24. Jaschke A. C. Honing H. Scherder E. J. A. (2018b). Longitudinal analysis of music education on executive functions in primary school children. Front. Neurosci. 12: 103. 10.3389/fnins.2018.00103 29541017 PMC5835523 · DOI
  25. Kołodziejski M. (2010). Stabilised Musical Aptitudes as Measured in Polish Pedagogy Students Using Advanced Measures of Music Audiation Test by Edwin E. Gordon. Oxford: Kûrybos erdvës, 8– 17.
  26. Kraus N. Strait D. L. (2015). Emergence of biological markers of musicianship with school-based music instruction. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1337 163– 169. 10.1111/nyas.12631 25773631 · DOI
  27. Martins M. Neves L. Rodrigues P. Vasconcelos O. Castro S. L. (2018). Orff-based music training enhances children’s manual dexterity and bimanual coordination. Front. Psychol. 9: 2616. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02616 30622496 PMC6308163 · DOI
  28. Mazor K. M. Sabin J. E. Boudreau D. Goodman M. J. Gurwitz J. H. Herrinton L. J. (2007). Cluster randomized trials: opportunities and barriers identified by leaders of eight health plans. Med. Care 45 S29– S37. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31806728c4 17909379 · DOI
  29. Mehr S. A. Schachner A. Katz R. C. Spelke E. S. (2013). Two randomized trials provide no consistent evidence for nonmusical cognitive benefits of brief preschool music enrichment. PLoS One 8: e82007. 10.1371/journal.pone.0082007 24349171 PMC3859544 · DOI
  30. Moreno S. Bialystok E. Barac R. Schellenberg E. G. Cepeda N. J. Chau T. (2011). Short-term music training enhances verbal intelligence and executive function. Psychol. Sci. 22 1425– 1433. 10.1177/0956797611416999 21969312 PMC3449320 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Moreno S. Lee Y. Janus M. Bialystok E. (2015). Short-term second language and music training induces lasting functional brain changes in early childhood. Child Dev. 86 394– 406. 10.1111/cdev.12297 25346534 PMC4376572 · DOI
  32. Patel A. D. (2012). “ Language, music, and the brain: a resource-sharing framework,” in Language and Music as Cognitive Systems, eds Rebuschat P. Rohrmeier M. Hawkins J. A. Cross I. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  33. Pinheiro J. Bates D. (2006). Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Cham: Springer Science & Business Media.
  34. Roden I. Kreutz G. Bongard S. (2012). Effects of a school-based instrumental music program on verbal and visual memory in primary school children: a longitudinal study. Front. Psychol. 3: 572. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00572 23267341 PMC3528082 · DOI
  35. Saarikivi K. Putkinen V. Tervaniemi M. Huotilainen M. (2016). Cognitive flexibility modulates maturation and music-training-related changes in neural sound discrimination. Eur. J. Neurosci. 44 1815– 1825. 10.1111/ejn.13176 26797826 · DOI
  36. Schellenberg E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychol. Sci. 15 511– 514. 15270994
  37. Schlaug G. Norton A. Overy K. Winner E. (2005). Effects of music training on the child’s brain and cognitive development. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1060 219– 230. 10.1196/annals.1360.015 16597769 · DOI
  38. Seinfeld S. Figueroa H. Ortiz-Gil J. Sanchez-Vives M. V. (2013). Effects of music learning and piano practice on cognitive function, mood and quality of life in older adults. Front. Psychol. 4: 810. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00810 24198804 PMC3814522 · DOI
  39. Seither-Preisler A. Parncutt R. Schneider P. (2014). Size and synchronization of auditory cortex promotes musical, literacy, and attentional skills in children. J. Neurosci. 34 10937– 10949. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5315-13.2014 25122894 PMC6705250 · DOI
  40. Serrallach B. Gross C. Bernhofs V. Engelmann D. Benner J. Gundert N. (2016). Neural biomarkers for dyslexia, ADHD, and ADD in the auditory cortex of children. Front. Neurosci. 10: 324. 10.3389/fnins.2016.00324 27471442 PMC4945653 · DOI
  41. Siegler R. S. Svetina M. (2002). A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Dev. 73 793– 809. 10.1111/1467-8624.00439 12038552 · DOI
  42. Slater J. Strait D. L. Skoe E. O’connell S. Thompson E. Kraus N. (2014). Longitudinal effects of group music instruction on literacy skills in low-income children. PLoS One 9: e113383. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113383 25409300 PMC4237413 · DOI
  43. Strait D. L. Kraus N. (2011). Can you hear me now? Musical training shapes functional brain networks for selective auditory attention and hearing speech in noise. Front. Psychol. 2: 113. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00113 21716636 PMC3115514 · DOI
  44. Thaut M. H. (2005). The future of music in therapy and medicine. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1060 303– 308. 16597779
  45. Tierney A. T. Krizman J. Kraus N. (2015). Music training alters the course of adolescent auditory development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 10062– 10067. 10.1073/pnas.1505114112 26195739 PMC4538630 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Trainor L. J. Shahin A. J. Roberts L. E. (2009). Understanding the benefits of musical training: effects on oscillatory brain activity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1169 133– 142. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04589.x 19673769 · DOI
  47. Wan C. Y. Schlaug G. (2010). Music making as a tool for promoting brain plasticity across the life span. Neuroscientist 16 566– 577. 10.1177/1073858410377805 20889966 PMC2996135 · DOI
  48. White-Schwoch T. Woodruff Carr K. Anderson S. Strait D. L. Kraus N. (2013). Older adults benefit from music training early in life: biological evidence for long-term training-driven plasticity. J. Neurosci. 33 17667– 17674. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2560-13.2013 24198359 PMC3818545 · DOI
  49. Zuk J. Benjamin C. Kenyon A. Gaab N. (2014). Behavioral and neural correlates of executive functioning in musicians and non-musicians. PLoS One 9: e99868. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099868 24937544 PMC4061064 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
James, C. E., Zuber, S., Dupuis-Lozeron, E., Abdili, L., Gervaise, D., & Kliegel, M.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
James, Clara E.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2020-06-16
Volume
14
Pages
567-567
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034292537
Cited by
66
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
110.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (100014, 152841)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
Keywords
cognitive development, sensorimotor development, elementary school students, working memory, attention, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, matrix reasoning, bimanual coordination, hand function, music education, school-based intervention, transfer effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review