Astrocytic and neuronal apolipoprotein E isoforms differentially affect neuronal excitability
Open accessAbstract
Synaptic changes and neuronal network dysfunction are among the earliest changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4), the major genetic risk factor in AD, has been shown to be present at synapses and to induce hyperexcitability in mouse knock-in brain regions vulnerable to AD. ApoE in the brain is mainly generated by astrocytes, however, neurons can also produce ApoE under stress conditions such as aging. The potential synaptic function(s) of ApoE and whether the cellular source of ApoE might affect neuronal excitability remain poorly understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to elucidate the synaptic localization and effects on neuronal activity of the two main human ApoE isoforms from different cellular sources in control and AD-like in vitro cultured neuron models. In this study ApoE is seen to localize at or near to synaptic terminals. Additionally, we detected a cellular source-specific effect of ApoE isoforms on neuronal activity measured by live cell Ca 2+ imaging. Neuronal activity increases after acute but not long-term administration of ApoE4 astrocyte medium. In contrast, ApoE expressed by neurons appears to induce the highest neuronal firing rate in the presence of ApoE3, rather than ApoE4. Moreover, increased neuronal activity in APP/PS1 AD transgenic compared to wild-type neurons is seen in the absence of astrocytic ApoE and the presence of astrocytic ApoE4, but not ApoE3. In summary, ApoE can target synapses and differentially induce changes in neuronal activity depending on whether ApoE is produced by astrocytes or neurons. Astrocytic ApoE induces the strongest neuronal firing with ApoE4, while the most active and efficient neuronal activity induced by neuronal ApoE is caused by ApoE3. ApoE isoforms also differentially affect neuronal activity in AD transgenic compared to wild-type neurons.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
APOE3 from both astrocytes and neurons can protect against neuronal hyperexcitability, whereas neuron-derived (but not astrocyte-derived) APOE4 is detrimental.
“Mouse models expressing APOE3 or APOE4 exclusively in either astrocytes or neurons (Box 3) show that APOE3 from both cell types can protect against neuronal hyperexcitability, whereas neuron-derived (but not astrocyte-derived) APOE4 is detrimental159,160.”
From Multifaceted roles of APOE in Alzheimer disease (2024) · cites this paper as [160]
The Discussion supports a potential protective effect of astrocytic ApoE3, but reports enhanced neuronal activity with astrocytic ApoE4—contrary to the claim that astrocyte-derived ApoE4 is not detrimental. The Results section ‘ApoE3 Neurons Show Increased Neuronal Activity Compared to ApoE4 Neurons’ also reports greater activity in ApoE3 neurons, while the Discussion says hyperexcitability was not seen in its ApoE4-expressing neuronal cultures. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredApoE is produced in both radial glia and other glia cell populations, and neurons produce ApoE under stress.
“ApoE is known to be produced in both radial glia and other glia cell populations (Zhao et al., 2023); however, neurons are known to produce ApoE under stress (Konings et al., 2021).”
From APOE3 Christchurch modulates β-catenin/Wnt signaling in iPS cell-derived cerebral organoids from Alzheimer’s cases (2024) · cites this paper as Konings et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Konings, S. C., Torres-Garcia, L., Martinsson, I., & Gouras, G. K.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Gouras, Gunnar K.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-09-21
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 734001-734001
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8490647
- OpenAlex
- W3199039027
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, APOE3, astrocytes, neuronal excitability, synaptic localization, Alzheimer's disease, calcium imaging, neuronal firing rate, astrocyte-neuron interaction, synapses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review