Cited by 6Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and Behaviors

Stress-impaired reward pathway promotes distinct feeding behavior patterns

Open access
Fujioka, Yusuke, Kawai, Kaori, Endo, Kuniyuki, Ishibashi, Minaka, Iwade, Nobuyuki, Tuerde, Dilina, Kaibuchi, Kozo, Yamashita, Takayuki +5 more·2024·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Although dietary behaviors are affected by neuropsychiatric disorders, various environmental conditions can have strong effects as well. We found that mice under multiple stresses, including social isolation, intermittent high-fat diet, and physical restraint, developed feeding behavior patterns characterized by a deviated bait approach (fixated feeding). All the tested stressors affected dopamine release at the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) shell and dopamine normalization reversed the feeding defects. Moreover, inhibition of dopaminergic activity in the ventral tegmental area that projects into the NAcc shell caused similar feeding pattern aberrations. Given that the deviations were not consistently accompanied by changes in the amount consumed or metabolic factors, the alterations in feeding behaviors likely reflect perturbations to a critical stress-associated pathway in the mesolimbic dopamine system. Thus, deviations in feeding behavior patterns that reflect reward system abnormalities can be sensitive biomarkers of psychosocial and physical stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2024.1349366

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fujioka, Y., Kawai, K., Endo, K., Ishibashi, M., Iwade, N., Tuerde, D., Kaibuchi, K., Yamashita, T., Yamanaka, A., Katsuno, M., Watanabe, H., Sobue, G., & Ishigaki, S.
Affiliations
  • Shiga University of Medical Science (JP)
  • Institute for Glyco-core Research (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Fujita Health University (JP)
  • Chinese Institute for Brain Research (CN)
  • Aichi Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Sobue, Gen
  • Ishigaki, Shinsuke
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2024-05-09
Volume
18
Pages
1349366-1349366
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396777835
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  • Takeda Science Foundation
  • Brain Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
stress, feeding behavior, reward pathways, dopamine, nucleus accumbens shell, ventral tegmental area, mesolimbic dopamine system, social isolation, high-fat diet, physical restraint, stress biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review