Cited by 53Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

A Randomized Phase III Study of Abemaciclib Versus Erlotinib in Patients with Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With a Detectable KRAS Mutation Who Failed Prior Platinum-Based Therapy: JUNIPER

Open access
Goldman, Jonathan W., Mazieres, Julien, Barlesi, Fabrice, Dragnev, Konstantin H., Koczywas, Marianna, Göskel, Tuncay, Cortot, Alexis B., Girard, Nicolas +16 more·2020·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: ) mutation. METHODS: oncogene, who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy and 1 additional therapy (could include immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy). Randomized patients (3:2) received either 200 mg abemaciclib twice daily or 150 mg erlotinib once daily with best supportive care until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: Between December 2014 and April 2017, 453 patients were randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib (N = 270) or erlotinib (N = 183). Median OS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5, 8.8) with abemaciclib and 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.4, 9.5) with erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.968 [95% CI: 0.768, 1.219]; p = .77). Median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.8, 3.8) with abemaciclib and 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.9, 2.0) with erlotinib (HR = 0.583 [95% CI: 0.470, 0.723]; p <.000001). ORR was 8.9% and 2.7% (p = .010), and the disease control rate was 54.4% and 31.7% (p <.001) with abemaciclib and erlotinib, respectively. Safety results reflected the known safety profiles of abemaciclib and erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the primary endpoint of OS was not met; PFS and ORR were improved with manageable toxicity in the abemaciclib arm. The increases in response rates and PFS support further investigation of abemaciclib in other NSCLC subpopulations or in combination with other agents. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02152631.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2020.578756

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Mirati Therapeutics, Inc Mirati therapeutics presents first clinical data of Phase 1/2 trial of MRTX849 At the 2019 AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics (2019). Available at: https://ir.mirati.com/news-releases/news-details/2019/Mirati-Therapeutics-Presents-First-Clinical-Data-Of-Phase-12-Trial-Of-MRTX849-At-The-2019-AACR-NCI-EORTC-International-Conference-On-Molecular-Targets-And-Cancer-Therapeutics/default.aspx (Accessed [Accessed September 1, 2020]).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldman, J. W., Mazieres, J., Barlesi, F., Dragnev, K. H., Koczywas, M., Göskel, T., Cortot, A. B., Girard, N., Wesseler, C., Bischoff, H., Nadal, E., Park, K., Lu, S., Taus, A., Cobo, M., Estrem, S. T., Wijayawardana, S. R., Turner, K., Oakley, G. J., Hurt, K. C., Chiang, A. Y., Hossain, A. M., John, W. J., & Paz-Ares, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Ege University (TR)
  • Université de Lille (FR)
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • Asklepios Klinikum Harburg (DE)
  • Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (ES)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES)
Corresponding author
Goldman, Jonathan W.
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2020-10-26
Volume
10
Pages
578756-578756
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097340813
Cited by
52
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
abemaciclib, erlotinib, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, KRAS mutation, CDK4/6 inhibitors, second-line therapy, platinum-refractory disease, progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, drug safety, targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, best supportive care, disease control rate, treatment toxicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review