Cited by 46Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Cancer or Tuberculosis: A Comprehensive Review of the Clinical and Imaging Features in Diagnosis of the Confusing Mass

Open access
Xiang, Yufan, Huang, Chen, He, Yan, Zhang, Qin·2021·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

Confusing masses constitute a challenging clinical problem for differentiating between cancer and tuberculosis diagnoses. This review summarizes the major theories designed to identify factors associated with misdiagnosis, such as imaging features, laboratory tests, and clinical characteristics. Then, the clinical experiences regarding the misdiagnosis of cancer and tuberculosis are summarized. Finally, the main diagnostic points and differential diagnostic criteria are explored, and the characteristics of multimodal imaging and radiomics are summarized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2021.644150

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Head and neck extrapulmonary tuberculosis is rare.

    “Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) of the head and neck is a rare but difficult diagnosis”

    From Head and Neck Tuberculosis: A Rare Diagnosis and the Role of Surgical Biopsy and Histopathological Evaluation in Extrapulmonary Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Methods table describes glottic tuberculosis as “very rare,” and the “Definitive Diagnoses of Rare Diseases” section explains why rare conditions can be difficult to diagnose. These passages support the point for glottic tuberculosis, but do not establish that head-and-neck extrapulmonary tuberculosis as a whole is rare. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A diagnosis of certainty implies a biopsy of the lesion followed by histopathological examination.

    “Given the ease of misdiagnosing TB for carcinoma, a diagnosis of certainty will imply a biopsy of the lesion followed by a histopathological examination [12].”

    From Head and Neck Tuberculosis: A Rare Diagnosis and the Role of Surgical Biopsy and Histopathological Evaluation in Extrapulmonary Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Conclusions describe excisional biopsy as potentially the best definitive method for confusing masses and histopathological examination as a diagnostic gold standard. The claim is more categorical than the review: it also names tuberculosis cultures as a gold standard, and the Methods report diagnoses confirmed without lesion biopsy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiang, Y., Huang, C., He, Y., & Zhang, Q.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Qin
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2021-04-28
Volume
11
Pages
644150-644150
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159860587
Cited by
46
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
differential diagnosis, misdiagnosis, lung mass, imaging features, radiomics, multimodal imaging, clinical features, laboratory testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review