Cited by 50AI in cancer detectionCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Deep learning for the detection of anatomical tissue structures and neoplasms of the skin on scanned histopathological tissue sections

Open access
Kriegsmann, Katharina, Lobers, Frithjof, Zgorzelski, Christiane, Kriegsmann, Jörg, Janßen, Charlotte, Meliß, Rolf Rüdinger, Muley, Thomas, Sack, Ulrich +2 more·2022·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) and melanoma are among the most common cancer types. Correct diagnosis based on histological evaluation after biopsy or excision is paramount for adequate therapy stratification. Deep learning on histological slides has been suggested to complement and improve routine diagnostics, but publicly available curated and annotated data and usable models trained to distinguish common skin tumors are rare and often lack heterogeneous non-tumor categories. A total of 16 classes from 386 cases were manually annotated on scanned histological slides, 129,364 100 x 100 µm (~395 x 395 px) image tiles were extracted and split into a training, validation and test set. An EfficientV2 neuronal network was trained and optimized to classify image categories. Cross entropy loss, balanced accuracy and Matthews correlation coefficient were used for model evaluation. Image and patient data were assessed with confusion matrices. Application of the model to an external set of whole slides facilitated localization of melanoma and non-tumor tissue. Automated differentiation of BCC, SqCC, melanoma, naevi and non-tumor tissue structures was possible, and a high diagnostic accuracy was achieved in the validation (98%) and test (97%) set. In summary, we provide a curated dataset including the most common neoplasms of the skin and various anatomical compartments to enable researchers to train, validate and improve deep learning models. Automated classification of skin tumors by deep learning techniques is possible with high accuracy, facilitates tumor localization and has the potential to support and improve routine diagnostics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2022.1022967

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The skin tumor patch classification task consists of tissue patches of 378 histopathology WSIs for classification of 16 categories.

    “The skin tumor patch classification task66 consists of tissue patches of 378 histopathology WSIs from the archive of the Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University, the MVZ for Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics Trier and the Institute for Dermatopathology Hannover for classification of 16 categories including 4 tumor types and 12 normal tissue structures.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Achi HE Belousova T Chen L Wahed A Wang I Hu Z. Automated diagnosis of lymphoma with digital pathology images using deep learning. Ann Clin Lab Sci (2019) 49: 153–60. 31028058

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kriegsmann, K., Lobers, F., Zgorzelski, C., Kriegsmann, J., Janßen, C., Meliß, R. R., Muley, T., Sack, U., Steinbuss, G., & Kriegsmann, M.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • German Center for Lung Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Kriegsmann, Mark
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2022-11-22
Volume
12
Pages
1022967-1022967
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311027007
Cited by
50
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Medizinischen Fakultät Heidelberg, Universität Heidelberg
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
skin cancer, histopathology, melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, nevi, whole slide images, histopathological image classification, EfficientNetV2, computer-aided diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review