Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endophytic Fungi—Alternative Sources of Cytotoxic Compounds: A Review

Open access
Uzma, Fazilath, Mohan, Chakrabhavi D., Hashem, Abeer, Konappa, Narasimha M., Rangappa, Shobith, Kamath, Praveen V., Singh, Bhim P., Mudili, Venkataramana, Gupta, Vijai K., Siddaiah, Chandra N., Chowdappa, Srinivas, Alqarawi, Abdulaziz A., Abd_Allah, Elsayed F.·2018·Frontiers in Pharmacology

Abstract

Cancer is a major cause of death worldwide, with an increasing number of cases being reported annually. The elevated rate of mortality necessitates a global challenge to explore newer sources of anticancer drugs. Recent advancements in cancer treatment involve the discovery and development of new and improved chemotherapeutics derived from natural or synthetic sources. Natural sources offer the potential of finding new structural classes with unique bioactivities for cancer therapy. Endophytic fungi represent a rich source of bioactive metabolites that can be manipulated to produce desirable novel analogs for chemotherapy. This review offers a current and integrative account of clinically used anticancer drugs such as taxol, podophyllotoxin, camptothecin, and vinca alkaloids in terms of their mechanism of action, isolation from endophytic fungi and their characterization, yield obtained, and fungal strain improvement strategies. It also covers recent literature on endophytic fungal metabolites from terrestrial, mangrove, and marine sources as potential anticancer agents and emphasizes the findings for cytotoxic bioactive compounds tested against specific cancer cell lines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2018.00309

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 127 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Uzma, F., Mohan, C. D., Hashem, A., Konappa, N. M., Rangappa, S., Kamath, P. V., Singh, B. P., Mudili, V., Gupta, V. K., Siddaiah, C. N., Chowdappa, S., Alqarawi, A. A., & Abd_Allah, E. F.
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2018-04-26
Volume
9
Pages
309-309
ISSN
1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802605569
Cited by
293
References
127
FWCI
15.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endophytic Fungi—Alternative Sources of Cytotoxic Compounds: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fphar.2018.00309
The paper
Uzma, F., Mohan, C. D., Hashem, A., Konappa, N. M., Rangappa, S., Kamath, P. V., Singh, B. P., Mudili, V., Gupta, V. K., Siddaiah, C. N., Chowdappa, S., Alqarawi, A. A., & Abd_Allah, E. F. (2018). Endophytic Fungi—Alternative Sources of Cytotoxic Compounds: A Review. Frontiers in Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00309

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.