Cited by 148Identification and Quantification in FoodPharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingGenetically Modified Organisms Research

The DNA-Based Authentication of Commercial Herbal Products Reveals Their Globally Widespread Adulteration

Open access
Ichim, Mihael Cristin·2019·Frontiers in Pharmacology

Abstract

The herbal products, sold worldwide as medicines or foods, are perceived as low risk because they are considered natural and thus safe. The quality of these products is ineffectively regulated and controlled. The growing evidence for their lack of authenticity is causing deep concern, but the scale of this phenomenon at the global, continental or national scale remains unknown. We analyzed data reporting the authenticity, as detected with DNA-based methods, of 5,957 commercial herbal products sold in 37 countries, distributed in all six inhabited continents. Our global survey shows that a substantial proportion (27%) of the herbal products commercialized in the global marketplace is adulterated when their content was tested against their labeled, claimed ingredient species. The adulterated herbal products are distributed across all continents and regions. The proportion of adulterated products varies significantly among continents, being highest in Australia (79%), South America (67%), lower in Europe (47%), North America (33%), Africa (27%) and the lowest in Asia (23%). The commercial HPs' authenticity among the 37 countries included in our global analysis ranges between 0 and 100% from the total number of product reported for each specific national marketplace. For 9 countries, more than 100 products were successfully DNA-based authenticated and reported. From these countries, the highest percentage of adulterated commercial HPs was reported for Brazil (68%), followed distantly by Taiwan (32%), India (31%), USA (29%), followed closely by Malaysia (24%), Japan (23%), South Korea (23%), Thailand (20%), and China (19%). Our results confirm the large-scale presence of adulterated herbal products throughout the global market. The adulterated herbal products contain undeclared contaminant, substitute, and filler species, or none of the labeled species, which all may be accidental or intentional, economically-motivated and fraudulent. Due to the ever-increasing analytical sensitivity of the high throughput DNA sequencing, increasingly used for the untargeted, simultaneous multi-taxa identification, the proportion of adulterated HPs detected on the global market is expected to increase. In the context of the increasing demand for HPs, the limited supply of raw materials derived from many plant species, some of which being already nationally or internationally protected and having various degrees of trade restrictions, adds up to the differences and discrepancies between national HPs' regulatory frameworks and further increases the risks of adulteration of many types of herbal products. The globally widespread adulteration is a serious threat to consumers' well-being and safety, in spite of herbal products' claimed or expected health benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2019.01227

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Botanical identity and actual alkaloid content of berberine products vary considerably, and contamination and substitution are documented in botanical products.

    “The first is product quality: botanical identity and actual alkaloid content vary considerably, and contamination and substitution are documented in botanical products [32,34].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion reports that 27% of successfully analyzed commercial herbal products did not match their claimed composition and describes contamination and substitute species. It does not establish variation in alkaloid content or findings specific to berberine products; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. No page numbers were provided. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Non-conformity of a significant proportion of marketed berberine products means that the magnitude of any interaction is intrinsically unpredictable without standardization.

    “Non-conformity of a significant proportion of marketed products means that the magnitude of any interaction is intrinsically unpredictable without standardization [32,34].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion reports that 27% of successfully analyzed commercial herbal products did not match their claimed composition and notes that herbal products can interact with conventional drugs. It does not establish a non-conformity rate for berberine products or say that non-conformity makes the magnitude of an interaction intrinsically unpredictable without standardization. The reported rate applies to herbal products broadly. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neither direction of product non-conformity can be read off the label, so the defensible position is that the perpetrator dose is unknown.

    “Neither direction can be read off the label, so the defensible position is that the perpetrator dose is unknown [2,32,34].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that 27% of analyzed herbal products did not match their labeled or expected composition, supporting the concern that a label may not reliably identify what is in a product. It does not assess whether the amount of an interacting ingredient is higher or lower than labeled, or establish that its dose is unknown. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Botanical contamination and substitution are documented through DNA barcoding techniques in botanical products.

    “Botanical contamination and substitution are documented through DNA barcoding techniques in botanical products [34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. British Pharmacopoeia Commission (2018). “ DNA barcoding as a tool for botanical identification of herbal drugs,” in British Pharmacopoeia supplementary chapter SC VII D. TSO. (London, United Kingdom: TSO)
  2. Pharmacopoeia Committee of P. R. China (2015). Pharmacopoeia of People’s Republic of China Vol. I Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press.
  3. World Health Organization (2013). WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014-2023. (Geneva, Switezerland: WHO Press), 76 p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ichim, M. C.
Affiliations
National Institute of Research and Development for Biological Sciences (RO)
Corresponding author
Ichim, Mihael Cristin
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2019-10-24
Volume
10
Pages
1227-1227
ISSN
1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981596060
Cited by
148
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
herbal medicine adulteration, DNA-based authentication, commercial herbal products, species misidentification, plant identification, herbal product regulation, consumer safety, next-generation sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review