Cited by 52Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and HealthNeonatal and fetal brain pathology

Fetal growth restriction and stillbirth: Biomarkers for identifying at risk fetuses

Open access
King, Victoria J., Bennet, Laura, Stone, Peter R., Clark, Alys, Gunn, Alistair J., Dhillon, Simerdeep K.·2022·Frontiers in Physiology

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major cause of stillbirth, prematurity and impaired neurodevelopment. Its etiology is multifactorial, but many cases are related to impaired placental development and dysfunction, with reduced nutrient and oxygen supply. The fetus has a remarkable ability to respond to hypoxic challenges and mounts protective adaptations to match growth to reduced nutrient availability. However, with progressive placental dysfunction, chronic hypoxia may progress to a level where fetus can no longer adapt, or there may be superimposed acute hypoxic events. Improving detection and effective monitoring of progression is critical for the management of complicated pregnancies to balance the risk of worsening fetal oxygen deprivation in utero, against the consequences of iatrogenic preterm birth. Current surveillance modalities include frequent fetal Doppler ultrasound, and fetal heart rate monitoring. However, nearly half of FGR cases are not detected in utero, and conventional surveillance does not prevent a high proportion of stillbirths. We review diagnostic challenges and limitations in current screening and monitoring practices and discuss potential ways to better identify FGR, and, critically, to identify the “tipping point” when a chronically hypoxic fetus is at risk of progressive acidosis and stillbirth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphys.2022.959750

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An association has been found between certain maternal bloodstream biomarkers and the development of preeclampsia, impaired fetal growth, and stillbirth.

    “Biomarkers in the maternal bloodstream have been investigated extensively and an association has been found between certain biomarkers and the development of preeclampsia, impaired fetal growth and stillbirth16–18.”

    From Multi-centre deep learning for placenta segmentation in obstetric ultrasound with multi-observer and cross-country generalization (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

    The ‘Plasma and maternal cardiovascular and serum biomarkers’ section (page unavailable) describes maternal circulating markers associated with fetal growth restriction. The table in ‘Doppler ultrasound, fetal biometry and biochemistry measures’ (page unavailable) also reports a circulating marker elevated in patients who developed preeclampsia or delivered a small-for-gestational-age infant. The cited passages do not establish an association between maternal bloodstream biomarkers and stillbirth; the paper also cautions that individual markers have poor predictive value for adverse outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 207 · Cited by 52

Authors
King, V. J., Bennet, L., Stone, P. R., Clark, A., Gunn, A. J., & Dhillon, S. K.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Dhillon, Simerdeep K.
Venue
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2022-08-19
Volume
13
Pages
959750-959750
ISSN
1664-042X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293809642
Cited by
52
References
207
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Auckland Medical Research Foundation (1118010, 17/601)
  • Cure Kids (17/601)
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand (17/601, 1118010, 20/437)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Keywords
fetal growth restriction, stillbirth, biomarkers, placental insufficiency, fetal hypoxia, fetal acidosis, fetal monitoring, fetal Doppler, fetal heart rate monitoring, preterm birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review