The DOI matches its Crossref record; 229 of the 229 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk
Open accessAbstract
Plants growing in their natural habitats are often challenged simultaneously by multiple stress factors, both abiotic and biotic. Research has so far been limited to responses to individual stresses, and understanding of adaptation to combinatorial stress is limited, but indicative of non-additive interactions. Omics data analysis and functional characterization of individual genes has revealed a convergence of signaling pathways for abiotic and biotic stress adaptation. Taking into account that most data originate from imposition of individual stress factors, this review summarizes these findings in a physiological context, following the pathogenesis timeline and highlighting potential differential interactions occurring between abiotic and biotic stress signaling across the different cellular compartments and at the whole plant level. Potential effects of abiotic stress on resistance components such as extracellular receptor proteins, R-genes and systemic acquired resistance will be elaborated, as well as crosstalk at the levels of hormone, reactive oxygen species, and redox signaling. Breeding targets and strategies are proposed focusing on either manipulation and deployment of individual common regulators such as transcription factors or pyramiding of non- (negatively) interacting components such as R-genes with abiotic stress resistance genes. We propose that dissection of broad spectrum stress tolerance conferred by priming chemicals may provide an insight on stress cross regulation and additional candidate genes for improving crop performance under combined stress. Validation of the proposed strategies in lab and field experiments is a first step toward the goal of achieving tolerance to combinatorial stress in crops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Contrasting Mechanisms of Defense Against Biotrophic and Necrotrophic Pathogens
Glazebrook, J. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923 · Cited by 4,367
Significance of Inducible Defense-related Proteins in Infected Plants
van Loon, L. C., Rep, M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 · Cited by 3,410
Foyer, C. H., & Noctor, G. (2005) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.033589 · Cited by 2,952
Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response
Wang, W., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O., & Altman, A. (2004) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006 · Cited by 2,759
MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity
Asai, T., Tena, G., Plotnikova, J., Willmann, M. R., Chiu, W.-L., Gomez-Gomez, L., Boller, T., Ausubel, F. M., & Sheen, J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415977a · Cited by 2,726
Drought-Induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 Through 2009
Zhao, M., & Running, S. W. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192666 · Cited by 2,674
Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202 · Cited by 2,568
Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses
Bari, R., & Jones, J. D. G. (2009) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0 · Cited by 2,565
Cited by
Zandalinas, S. I., Fritschi, F. B., & Mittler, R. (2021) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.011 · Cited by 1,122
Plant Responses to Simultaneous Biotic and Abiotic Stress: Molecular Mechanisms
Rejeb, I., Pastor, V., & Mauch-Mani, B. (2014) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants3040458 · Cited by 785
Pandey, P., Ramegowda, V., & Senthil-Kumar, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00723 · Cited by 572
Nejat, N., & Mantri, N. (2017) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.21775/cimb.023.001 · Cited by 287
The CRISPR/Cas Genome-Editing Tool: Application in Improvement of Crops
Khatodia, S., Bhatotia, K., Passricha, N., Khurana, S. M. P., & Tuteja, N. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00506 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Kissoudis, C., van de Wiel, C., Visser, R. G. F., & van der Linden, G.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-05-19
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 207-207
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088102366
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 229
- FWCI
- 35.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2014.00207
- The paper
- Kissoudis, C., van de Wiel, C., Visser, R. G. F., & van der Linden, G. (2014). Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.