The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Combined Abiotic and Biotic Stresses on Plant Growth and Avenues for Crop Improvement by Exploiting Physio-morphological Traits
Open accessAbstract
Global warming leads to the concurrence of a number of abiotic and biotic stresses, thus affecting agricultural productivity. Occurrence of abiotic stresses can alter plant-pest interactions by enhancing host plant susceptibility to pathogenic organisms, insects, and by reducing competitive ability with weeds. On the contrary, some pests may alter plant response to abiotic stress factors. Therefore, systematic studies are pivotal to understand the effect of concurrent abiotic and biotic stress conditions on crop productivity. However, to date, a collective database on the occurrence of various stress combinations in agriculturally prominent areas is not available. This review attempts to assemble published information on this topic, with a particular focus on the impact of combined drought and pathogen stresses on crop productivity. In doing so, this review highlights some agriculturally important morpho-physiological traits that can be utilized to identify genotypes with combined stress tolerance. In addition, this review outlines potential role of recent genomic tools in deciphering combined stress tolerance in plants. This review will, therefore, be helpful for agronomists and field pathologists in assessing the impact of the interactions between drought and plant-pathogens on crop performance. Further, the review will be helpful for physiologists and molecular biologists to design agronomically relevant strategies for the development of broad spectrum stress tolerant crops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination
Mittler, R. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002 · Cited by 3,083
Abiotic and biotic stress combinations
Suzuki, N., Rivero, R. M., Shulaev, V., Blumwald, E., & Mittler, R. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12797 · Cited by 2,153
Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought
Comas, L. H., Becker, S. R., Cruz, V. M. V., Byrne, P. F., & Dierig, D. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00442 · Cited by 1,579
Blum, A. (2009) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.03.009 · Cited by 1,303
Climate Change Effects on Plant Disease: Genomes to Ecosystems
Garrett, K. A., Dendy, S. P., Frank, E. E., Rouse, M. N., & Travers, S. E. (2006) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143420 · Cited by 1,002
CLIMATE CHANGE AND PLANT DISEASE MANAGEMENT
Coakley, S. M., Scherm, H., & Chakraborty, S. (1999) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.399 · Cited by 725
Reconsidering plant memory: Intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics
Crisp, P. A., Ganguly, D., Eichten, S. R., Borevitz, J. O., & Pogson, B. J. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501340 · Cited by 708
Ramegowda, V., & Senthil-Kumar, M. (2015) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2014.11.008 · Cited by 644
Self-citationThe Impact of Water Deficiency on Leaf Cuticle Lipids of Arabidopsis
Kosma, D. K., Bourdenx, B., Bernard, A., Parsons, E. P., Lü, S., Joubès, J., & Jenks, M. A. (2009) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.109.141911 · Cited by 599
Pandey, P., Ramegowda, V., & Senthil-Kumar, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00723 · Cited by 572
Self-citation
Cited by
Biostimulants Application in Horticultural Crops under Abiotic Stress Conditions
Bulgari, R., Franzoni, G., & Ferrante, A. (2019) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy9060306 · Cited by 783
Developing climate‐resilient crops: improving plant tolerance to stress combination
Rivero, R. M., Mittler, R., Blumwald, E., & Zandalinas, S. I. (2022) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.15483 · Cited by 622
Induced Systemic Resistance for Improving Plant Immunity by Beneficial Microbes
Yu, Y., Gui, Y., Li, Z., Jiang, C., Guo, J., & Niu, D. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11030386 · Cited by 570
Endophytes and their potential in biotic stress management and crop production
Chaudhary, P., Agri, U., Chaudhary, A., Kumar, A., & Kumar, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.933017 · Cited by 284
Metabolomics as an Emerging Tool for the Study of Plant–Pathogen Interactions
Castro-Moretti, F. R., Gentzel, I. N., Mackey, D., & Alonso, A. P. (2020) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo10020052 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Pandey, P., Irulappan, V., Bagavathiannan, M. V., & Senthil-Kumar, M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-04-18
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 537-537
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2605774836
- Cited by
- 955
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 59.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Combined Abiotic and Biotic Stresses on Plant Growth and Avenues for Crop Improvement by Exploiting Physio-morphological Traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2017.00537
- The paper
- Pandey, P., Irulappan, V., Bagavathiannan, M. V., & Senthil-Kumar, M. (2017). Impact of Combined Abiotic and Biotic Stresses on Plant Growth and Avenues for Crop Improvement by Exploiting Physio-morphological Traits. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.