CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 570Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlImmune Response and Inflammation

Induced Systemic Resistance for Improving Plant Immunity by Beneficial Microbes

Open access
Yu, Yiyang, Gui, Ying, Li, Zijie, Jiang, Chunhao, Guo, Jianhua, Niu, Dongdong·2022·Plants
DOI 10.3390/plants11030386PMC PMC8839143
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Plant beneficial microorganisms improve the health and growth of the associated plants. Application of beneficial microbes triggers an enhanced resistance state, also termed as induced systemic resistance (ISR), in the host, against a broad range of pathogens. Upon the activation of ISR, plants employ long-distance systemic signaling to provide protection for distal tissue, inducing rapid and strong immune responses against pathogens invasions. The transmission of ISR signaling was commonly regarded to be a jasmonic acid- and ethylene-dependent, but salicylic acid-independent, transmission. However, in the last decade, the involvement of both salicylic acid and jasmonic acid/ethylene signaling pathways and the regulatory roles of small RNA in ISR has been updated. In this review, the plant early recognition, responsive reactions, and the related signaling transduction during the process of the plant–beneficial microbe interaction was discussed, with reflection on the crucial regulatory role of small RNAs in the beneficial microbe-mediated ISR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/plants11030386

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 159

  1. [1]Pandey P. Irulappan V. Bagavathiannan M.V. Senthil-Kumar M. Impact of Combined Abiotic and Biotic Stresses on Plant Growth and Avenues for Crop Improvement by Exploiting Physio-morphological Traits Front. Plant Sci. 2017 8 537 10.3389/fpls.2017.00537 28458674 PMC5394115 · DOI
  2. [2]Zipfel C. Oldroyd G.E.D. Plant signalling in symbiosis and immunity Nature 2017 543 328 336 10.1038/nature22009 28300100 · DOI
  3. [3]Bigeard J. Colcombet J. Hirt H. Signaling Mechanisms in Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI) Mol. Plant 2015 8 521 539 10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.022 25744358 · DOI
  4. [4]Guo M. Tian F. Wamboldt Y. Alfano J.-R. The Majority of the Type III Effector Inventory of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Can Suppress Plant Immunity Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2009 22 1069 1080 10.1094/MPMI-22-9-1069 19656042 PMC2778199 · DOI
  5. [5]Jones J.D.G. Dangl J.L. The plant immune system Nature 2006 444 323 329 10.1038/nature05286 17108957 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Yuan M. Jiang Z. Bi G. Nomura K. Liu M. Wang Y. Cai B. Zhou J.-M. He S.Y. Xin X.-F. Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity Nature 2021 592 105 109 10.1038/s41586-021-03316-6 33692546 PMC8016741 · DOI
  7. [7]Ross A.F. Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants Virology 1961 14 340 358 10.1016/0042-6822(61)90319-1 13743578 · DOI
  8. [8]Kloepper J.W. Tuzun S. Kuc J.A. Proposed definitions related to induced disease resistance Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 1992 2 349 351 10.1080/09583159209355251 · DOI
  9. [9]Conrath U. Beckers G.J.M. Flors V. García-Agustín P. Jakab G. Mauch F. Newman M.-A. Pieterse C.M.J. Poinssot B. Pozo M.J. Priming: Getting ready for battle Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2006 19 1062 1071 10.1094/MPMI-19-1062 17022170 · DOI
  10. [10]Gaffney T. Friedrich L. Vernooij B. Negrotto D. Nye G. Uknes S. Ward E. Kessmann H. Ryals J. Requirement of salicylic-acid for the induction of systemic acquired-resistance Science 1993 261 754 756 10.1126/science.261.5122.754 17757215 · DOI
  11. [11]Vanloon L.C. Pathogenesis-related proteins Plant Mol. Biol. 1985 4 111 116 10.1007/BF02418757 24310747 · DOI
  12. [12]Alstrom S. Induction of disease resistance in common bean susceptible to halo blight bacterial pathogen after seed bacterization with rhizosphere Pseudomonads J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1991 37 495 501 10.2323/jgam.37.495 · DOI
  13. [15]Liu L. Kloepper J.W. Tuzun S. Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against Fusarium-wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Phytopathology 1995 85 695 698 10.1094/Phyto-85-695 · DOI
  14. [16]Zehnder G.W. Yao C. Murphy J.F. Sikora E.R. Kloepper J.W. Induction of resistance in tomato against cucumber mosaic cucumovirus by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Biocontrol 2000 45 127 137 10.1023/A:1009923702103 · DOI
  15. [19]Pieterse C.M. Van Wees S.C. Hoffland E. Van Pelt J.A. Van Loon L.C. Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression Plant Cell 1996 8 1225 1237 8776893 PMC161233
  16. [20]Knoester M. Pieterse C.M. Bol J.F. Van Loon L.C. Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by rhizobacteria requires ethylene-dependent signaling at the site of application Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1999 12 720 727 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.8.720 10475689 · DOI
  17. [21]Niu D.D. Liu H.X. Jiang C.H. Wang Y.P. Wang Q.Y. Jin H.L. Guo J.H. The plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156 induces systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana by simultaneously activating salicylate- and jasmonate/ethylee-dependent signaling pathways Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011 24 533 542 10.1094/MPMI-09-10-0213 21198361 · DOI
  18. [22]Samaras A. Roumeliotis E. Ntasiou P. Karaoglanidis G. Bacillus subtilis MBI600 Promotes Growth of Tomato Plants and Induces Systemic Resistance Contributing to the Control of Soilborne Pathogens Plants 2021 10 1113 10.3390/plants10061113 34072940 PMC8229581 · DOI
  19. [23]Yuan M. Huang Y. Ge W. Jia Z. Song S. Zhang L. Huang Y. Involvement of jasmonic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid signaling pathways behind the systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum H9 in cucumber BMC Genom. 2019 20 144 10.1186/s12864-019-5513-8 30777003 PMC6379975 · DOI
  20. [25]Ongena M. Duby F. Jourdan E. Beaudry T. Jadin V. Dommes J. Thonart P. Bacillus subtilis M4 decreases plant susceptibility towards fungal pathogens by increasing host resistance associated with differential gene expression Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2005 67 692 698 10.1007/s00253-004-1741-0 15578181 · DOI
  21. [26]Cordier C. Pozo M.J. Barea J.M. Gianinazzi S. Gianinazzi-Pearson V. Cell defense responses associated with localized and systemic resistance to Phytophthora parasitica induced in tomato by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1998 11 1017 1028 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.10.1017 · DOI
  22. [28]Zhang J. Zhou J.-M. Plant Immunity Triggered by Microbial Molecular Signatures Mol. Plant 2010 3 783 793 10.1093/mp/ssq035 20713980 · DOI
  23. [29]Saijo Y. Loo E.P.-I. Yasuda S. Pattern recognition receptors and signaling in plant-microbe interactions Plant J. 2018 93 592 613 10.1111/tpj.13808 29266555 · DOI
  24. [30]Zamioudis C. Pieterse C.M.J. Modulation of Host Immunity by Beneficial Microbes Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012 25 139 150 10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0179 21995763 · DOI
  25. [31]Bazin J. Mariappan K. Jiang Y. Blein T. Voelz R. Crespi M. Hirt H. Role of MPK4 in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered alternative splicing in Arabidopsis PLoS Pathog. 2020 16 e1008401 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008401 32302366 PMC7164602 · DOI
  26. [32]Felix G. Duran J.D. Volko S. Boller T. Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin Plant J. 1999 18 265 276 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00265.x 10377992 · DOI
  27. [33]Deng Y. Chen H. Li C. Xu J. Qi Q. Xu Y. Zhu Y. Zheng J. Peng D. Ruan L. Endophyte Bacillus subtilis evade plant defense by producing lantibiotic subtilomycin to mask self-produced flagellin Commun. Biol. 2019 2 368 10.1038/s42003-019-0614-0 31633059 PMC6787100 · DOI
  28. [34]Trdá L. Fernandez O. Boutrot F. Héloir M.C. Kelloniemi J. Daire X. Adrian M. Clément C. Zipfel C. Dorey S. The grapevine flagellin receptor VvFLS2 differentially recognizes flagellin-derived epitopes from the endophytic growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans and plant pathogenic bacteria New Phytol. 2014 201 1371 1384 10.1111/nph.12592 24491115 · DOI
  29. [35]Segonzac C. Zipfel C. Activation of plant pattern-recognition receptors by bacteria Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011 14 54 61 10.1016/j.mib.2010.12.005 21215683 · DOI
  30. [36]Chinchilla D. Zipfel C. Robatzek S. Kemmerling B. Nürnberger T. Jones J.D.G. Felix G. Boller T. A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence Nature 2007 448 497 500 10.1038/nature05999 17625569 · DOI
  31. [37]Lu D. Wu S. Gao X. Zhang Y. Shan L. He P. A receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase, BIK1, associates with a flagellin receptor complex to initiate plant innate immunity Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010 107 496 501 10.1073/pnas.0909705107 20018686 PMC2806711 · DOI
  32. [38]Madsen E.B. Madsen L.H. Radutoiu S. Olbryt M. Rakwalska M. Szczyglowski K. Sato S. Kaneko T. Tabata S. Sandal N. A receptor kinase gene of the LysM type is involved in legume perception of rhizobial signals Nature 2003 425 637 640 10.1038/nature02045 14534591 · DOI
  33. [40]Jacobs S. Zechmann B. Molitor A. Trujillo M. Petutschnig E. Lipka V. Kogel K.-H. Schäfer P. Broad-Spectrum Suppression of Innate Immunity Is Required for Colonization of Arabidopsis Roots by the Fungus Piriformospora indica Plant Physiol. 2011 156 726 740 10.1104/pp.111.176446 21474434 PMC3177271 · DOI
  34. [41]Leeman M. Van Pelt J.A. Den Ouden F.M. Heinsbroek M. Bakker P.A.H.M. Schippers B. Induction of systemic resistance against Fusarium-wilt of radish by lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas-fluorescens Phytopathology 1995 85 1021 1027 10.1094/Phyto-85-1021 · DOI
  35. [42]Millet Y.A. Danna C.H. Clay N.K. Songnuan W. Simon M.D. Werck-Reichhart D. Ausubel F.M. Innate Immune Responses Activated in Arabidopsis Roots by Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns Plant Cell 2010 22 973 990 10.1105/tpc.109.069658 20348432 PMC2861455 · DOI
  36. [43]Guo Q. Li Y. Lou Y. Shi M. Jiang Y. Zhou J. Sun Y. Xue Q. Lai H. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba13 induces plant systemic resistance and improves rhizosphere microecology against tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019 137 154 166 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.01.015 · DOI
  37. [44]Wang M. Xue J. Ma J. Feng X. Ying H. Xu H. Streptomyces lydicusM01 Regulates Soil Microbial Community and Alleviates Foliar Disease Caused by Alternaria alternataon Cucumbers Front. Microbiol. 2020 11 942 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00942 32499771 PMC7243425 · DOI
  38. [45]Wu L. Huang Z. Li X. Ma L. Gu Q. Wu H. Liu J. Borriss R. Wu Z. Gao X. Stomatal Closure and SA-, JA/ET-Signaling Pathways Are Essential for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 to Restrict Leaf Disease Caused by Phytophthora nicotianae in Nicotiana benthamiana Front. Microbiol. 2018 9 847 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00847 29755447 PMC5934478 · DOI
  39. [46]Chowdhury S.P. Uhl J. Grosch R. Alquéres S. Pittroff S. Dietel K. Schmitt-Kopplin P. Borriss R. Hartmann A. Cyclic Lipopeptides of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp plantarum Colonizing the Lettuce Rhizosphere Enhance Plant Defense Responses Toward the Bottom Rot Pathogen Rhizoctonia solani Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015 28 984 995 10.1094/MPMI-03-15-0066-R 26011557 · DOI
  40. [47]Ayaz M. Ali Q. Farzand A. Khan A. Ling H. Gao X. Nematicidal Volatiles from Bacillus atrophaeus GBSC56 Promote Growth and Stimulate Induced Systemic Resistance in Tomato against Meloidogyne incognita Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 22 5049 10.3390/ijms22095049 34068779 PMC8126219 · DOI
  41. [48]Niu D. Xia J. Jiang C. Qi B. Ling X. Lin S. Zhang W. Guo J. Jin H. Zhao H. Bacillus cereus AR156 primes induced systemic resistance by suppressing miR825/825* and activating defense-related genes in Arabidopsis J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2016 58 426 439 10.1111/jipb.12446 26526683 PMC5028193 · DOI
  42. [49]Nie P. Chen C. Yin Q. Jiang C. Guo J. Zhao H. Niu D. Function of miR825 and miR825* as Negative Regulators in Bacillus cereus AR156-elicited Systemic Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Arabidopsis thaliana Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20 5032 10.3390/ijms20205032 PMC6829492 31614458 · DOI
  43. [50]Huang C.J. Tsay J.F. Chang S.Y. Yang H.P. Wu W.S. Chen C.Y. Dimethyl disulfide is an induced systemic resistance elicitor produced by Bacillus cereus C1L Pest Manag. Sci. 2012 68 1306 1310 10.1002/ps.3301 22573612 · DOI
  44. [51]Chakraborty U. Chakraborty B. Basnet M. Plant growth promotion and induction of resistance in Camellia sinensis by Bacillus megaterium J. Basic Microb. 2006 46 186 195 10.1002/jobm.200510050 16721878 · DOI
  45. [52]Lakshmanan V. Castaneda R. Rudrappa T. Bais H.P. Root transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to beneficial Bacillus subtilis FB17 rhizobacteria revealed genes for bacterial recruitment and plant defense independent of malate efflux Planta 2013 238 657 668 10.1007/s00425-013-1920-2 23794026 · DOI
  46. [53]Chowdappa P. Kumar S.P.M. Lakshmi M.J.K. Upreti K. Growth stimulation and induction of systemic resistance in tomato against early and late blight by Bacillus subtilis OTPB1 or Trichoderma harzianum OTPB3 Biol. Control. 2013 65 109 117 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.11.009 · DOI
  47. [54]García-Gutiérrez L. Zeriouh H. Romero D. Cubero J. de Vicente A. Pérez-García A. The antagonistic strain Bacillus subtilis UMAF6639 also confers protection to melon plants against cucurbit powdery mildew by activation of jasmonate-and salicylic acid-dependent defence responses Microb. Biotechnol. 2013 6 264 274 10.1111/1751-7915.12028 23302493 PMC3815921 · DOI
  48. [55]Tjamos S.E. Flemetakis E. Paplomatas E.J. Katinakis P. Induction of resistance to Verticillium dahliae in Arabidopsis thaliana by the biocontrol agent K-165 and pathogenesis-related proteins gene expression Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2005 18 555 561 10.1094/MPMI-18-0555 15986925 · DOI
  49. [56]De Vleesschauwer D. Hoefte P.M. Redox-active pyocyanin secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 triggers systemic resistance to Magnaporthe grisea but enhances Rhizoctonia solani susceptibility in rice Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2006 19 1406 1419 10.1094/MPMI-19-1406 17153925 · DOI
  50. [57]De Meyer G. Audenaert K. Hofte M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2-induced systemic resistance in tobacco depends on in planta salicylic acid accumulation but is not associated with PR1a expression Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1999 105 513 517 10.1023/A:1008741015912 · DOI
  51. [58]Van de Mortel J.E. de Vos R.C. Dekkers E. Pineda A. Guillod L. Bouwmeester K. van Loon J.J.A. Dicke M. Raaijmakers J.M. Metabolic and Transcriptomic Changes Induced in Arabidopsis by the Rhizobacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens SS101 Plant Physiol. 2012 160 2173 2188 10.1104/pp.112.207324 23073694 PMC3510139 · DOI
  52. [59]Lakkis S. Trotel-Aziz P. Rabenoelina F. Schwarzenberg A. Nguema-Ona E. Clément C. Aziz A. Strengthening Grapevine Resistance by Pseudomonas fluorescens PTA-CT2 Relies on Distinct Defense Pathways in Susceptible and Partially Resistant Genotypes to Downy Mildew and Gray Mold Diseases Front. Plant Sci. 2019 10 1112 10.3389/fpls.2019.01112 31620150 PMC6759587 · DOI
  53. [60]Desrut A. Moumen B. Thibault F. Le Hir R. Coutos-Thévenot P. Vriet C. Beneficial rhizobacteria Pseudomonas simiae WCS417 induce major transcriptional changes in plant sugar transport J. Exp. Bot. 2020 71 7301 7315 10.1093/jxb/eraa396 32860502 · DOI
  54. [61]Morcillo R.J. Singh S.K. He D. An G.I. Vílchez J. Tang K. Yuan F. Sun Y. Shao C. Zhang S. Rhizobacterium-derived diacetyl modulates plant immunity in a phosphate-dependent manner EMBO J. 2020 39 e102602 10.15252/embj.2019102602 31802519 PMC6960444 · DOI
  55. [62]Li Y. Guo Q. Li Y. Sun Y. Xue Q. Lai H. Streptomyces pactum Act12 controls tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease and alters rhizosphere microbial communities Biol. Fert. Soils 2019 55 149 169 10.1007/s00374-019-01339-w · DOI
  56. [63]Daroodi Z. Taheri P.S. Direct antagonistic activity and tomato resistance induction of the endophytic fungus Acrophialophora jodhpurensis against Rhizoctonia solani Biol. Control. 2021 160 104696 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104696 · DOI
  57. [64]Johnson J.M. Ludwig A. Furch A.C.U. Mithöfer A. Scholz S. Reichelt M. Oelmüller R. The Beneficial Root-Colonizing Fungus Mortierella hyalina Promotes the Aerial Growth of Arabidopsis and Activates Calcium-Dependent Responses That Restrict Alternaria brassicae-Induced Disease Development in Roots Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2019 32 351 363 10.1094/MPMI-05-18-0115-R 30252617 · DOI
  58. [65]Sarkar D. Rovenich H. Jeena G. Nizam S. Tissier A. Balcke G.U. Mahdi L.K. Bonkowski M. Langen G. Zuccaro A. The inconspicuous gatekeeper: Endophytic Serendipita vermifera acts as extended plant protection barrier in the rhizosphere New Phytol. 2019 224 886 901 10.1111/nph.15904 31074884 · DOI
  59. [66]González-López M.D.C. Jijón-Moreno S. Dautt-Castro M. Ovando-Vázquez C. Ziv T. Horwitz B.A. Casas-Flores S. Secretome Analysis of Arabidopsis-Trichoderma atroviride Interaction Unveils New Roles for the Plant Glutamate:Glyoxylate Aminotransferase GGAT1 in Plant Growth Induced by the Fungus and Resistance against Botrytis cinerea Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 22 6804 10.3390/ijms22136804 34202732 PMC8268252 · DOI
  60. [67]Saenz-Mata J. Berenice Salazar-Badillo F. Francisco Jimenez-Bremont J. Transcriptional regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY genes under interaction with beneficial fungus Trichoderma atroviride Acta Physiol. Plant 2014 36 1085 1093 10.1007/s11738-013-1483-7 · DOI
  61. [68]Singh U.B. Malviya D. Singh S. Kumar M. Sahu P.K. Singh H.V. Kumar S. Roy M. Imran M. Rai J.P. Trichoderma harzianum-And Methyl Jasmonate-Induced Resistance to Bipolaris sorokiniana Through Enhanced Phenylpropanoid Activities in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Front. Microbiol. 2019 10 1697 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01697 31417511 PMC6685482 · DOI
  62. [69]Manganiello G. Sacco A. Ercolano M.R. Vinale F. Lanzuise S. Pascale A. Napolitano M. Lombardi N. Lorito M. Woo S.L. Modulation of Tomato Response to Rhizoctonia solani by Trichoderma harzianum and Its Secondary Metabolite Harzianic Acid Front. Microbiol. 2018 9 1966 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01966 30233507 PMC6127634 · DOI
  63. [70]Ruocco M. Lanzuise S. Lombardi N. Woo S.L. Vinale F. Marra R. Varlese R. Manganiello G. Pascale A. Scala V. Multiple Roles and Effects of a Novel Trichoderma Hydrophobin Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015 28 167 179 10.1094/MPMI-07-14-0194-R 25317667 · DOI
  64. [71]Chen Z.X. Silva H. Klessig D.F. Active oxygen species in the induction of plant systemic acquired-resistance by salicylic-acid Science 1993 262 1883 1886 10.1126/science.8266079 8266079 · DOI
  65. [72]Apel K. Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004 55 373 399 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 15377225 · DOI · Paper page
  66. [73]Wang W. Chen D.D. Zhang X.P. Liu D. Cheng Y.Y. Shen F.F. Role of plant respiratory burst oxidase homologs in stress responses Free Radic. Res. 2018 52 826 839 10.1080/10715762.2018.1473572 29732902 · DOI
  67. [74]Yasuhiro K. Ken S. Cyril Z. Regulation of the NADPH Oxidase RBOHD During Plant Immunity Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 56 1472 1480 25941234
  68. [75]Dat J. Vandenabeele S. Vranová E. Van Montagu M. Inzé D. Van Breusegem F. Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2000 57 779 795 10.1007/s000180050041 10892343 PMC11147059 · DOI
  69. [76]Jiang C.H. Fan Z.H. Xie P. Guo J.H. Bacillus cereus AR156 Extracellular Polysaccharides Served as a Novel Micro-associated Molecular Pattern to Induced Systemic Immunity to Pst DC3000 in Arabidopsis Front. Microbiol. 2016 7 664 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00664 27242694 PMC4876362 · DOI
  70. [77]Clay N.K. Adi A.M. Denoux C. Jander G. Ausubel F.M. Glucosinolate Metabolites Required for an Arabidopsis Innate Immune Response Science 2009 323 95 101 10.1126/science.1164627 19095898 PMC2630859 · DOI · Paper page
  71. [78]Sakthivel A. Balachandar D. Rhizobacteria-mediated root architectural improvement: A hidden potential for agricultural sustainability Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Agricultural Sustainability Springer Singapore 2019 111 128
  72. [80]Yedidia I. Benhamou N. Chet I. Induction of defense responses in cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) by the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999 65 1061 1070 10.1128/AEM.65.3.1061-1070.1999 10049864 PMC91145 · DOI
  73. [81]Trewavas A.J. Malho R. Ca2+ signalling in plant cells: The big network! Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998 1 428 433 10.1016/S1369-5266(98)80268-9 10066614 · DOI
  74. [82]Price A.H. Taylor A. Ripley S.J. Griffiths A. Trewavas A.J. Knight M.R. Oxidative signals in tobacco increase cytosolic calcium Plant Cell. 1994 6 1301 1310 10.2307/3869827 12244272 PMC160521 · DOI
  75. [83]Lecourieux D. Mazars C. Pauly N. Ranjeva R. Pugin A. Analysis and effects of cytosolic free calcium increases in response to elicitors in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia cells Plant Cell. 2002 14 2627 2641 10.1105/tpc.005579 12368509 PMC151240 · DOI
  76. [84]Bindschedler L. Minibayeva F. Gardner S.L. Gerrish C. Davies D.R. Bolwell G.P. Early signalling events in the apoplastic oxidative burst in suspension cultured French bean cells involve cAMP and Ca2+ New Phytol. 2001 151 185 194 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00170.x 33873377 · DOI
  77. [85]Zhao J. Davis L.C. Verpoorte R. Elicitor signal transduction leading to production of plant secondary metabolites Biotechnol. Adv. 2005 23 283 333 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.01.003 15848039 · DOI
  78. [86]Srivastava S. Chaudhry V. Mishra A. Chauhan P.S. Rehman A. Yadav A. Tuteja N. Nautiyal C.S. Gene expression profiling through microarray analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana colonized by Pseudomonas putida MTCC5279, a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Plant Signal. Behav. 2012 7 235 245 10.4161/psb.18957 22353860 PMC3405686 · DOI
  79. [87]Iqbal Z. Shariq Iqbal M. Singh S.P. Buaboocha T. Ca2+/Calmodulin Complex Triggers CAMTA Transcriptional Machinery Under Stress in Plants: Signaling Cascade and Molecular Regulation Front. Plant Sci. 2020 11 598327 10.3389/fpls.2020.598327 33343600 PMC7744605 · DOI
  80. [88]Dolmetsch R.E. Lewis R.S. Goodnow C.C. Healy J.I. Differential activation of transcription factors induced by Ca2+ response amplitude and duration Nature 1997 386 855 858 10.1038/386855a0 9126747 · DOI
  81. [89]Yang T.B. Poovaiah B.W. A calmodulin-binding/CGCG box DNA-binding protein family involved in multiple signaling pathways in plants J. Biol. Chem. 2002 277 45049 45058 10.1074/jbc.M207941200 12218065 · DOI
  82. [90]Du L. Ali G.S. Simons K.A. Hou J. Yang T. Reddy A.S.N. Poovaiah B.W. Ca2+/calmodulin regulates salicylic-acid-mediated plant immunity Nature 2009 457 1154 1158 10.1038/nature07612 19122675 · DOI
  83. [91]Vadassery J. Ranf S. Drzewiecki C. Mithöfer A. Mazars C. Scheel D. Lee J. Oelmüller R. A cell wall extract from the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica promotes growth of Arabidopsis seedlings and induces intracellular calcium elevation in roots Plant J. 2009 59 193 206 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03867.x 19392691 · DOI
  84. [92]Jogawat A. Meena M.K. Kundu A. Varma M. Vadassery J. Calcium channel CNGC19 mediates basal defense signaling to regulate colonization by Piriformospora indica in Arabidopsis roots J. Exp. Bot. 2020 71 2752 2768 10.1093/jxb/eraa028 31957790 PMC7210775 · DOI
  85. [93]Jiang C.H. Huang Z.Y. Xie P. Gu C. Li K. Wang D.C. Yu Y.-Y. Fan Z.-H. Wang C.-J. Wang Y.-P. Transcription factors WRKY70 and WRKY11 served as regulators in rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156-induced systemic resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis J. Exp. Bot. 2016 67 157 174 10.1093/jxb/erv445 26433201 · DOI
  86. [94]Dubos C. Stracke R. Grotewold E. Weisshaar B. Martin C. Lepiniec L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis Trends Plant Sci. 2010 15 573 581 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005 20674465 · DOI
  87. [95]Van der Ent S. Verhagen B.W. Van Doorn R. Bakker D. Verlaan M.G. Pel M.J. Joosten R.G. Proveniers M.C.G. Van Loon L.C. Ton J. MYB72 is required in early signaling steps of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in arabidopsis Plant Physiol. 2008 146 1293 1304 10.1104/pp.107.113829 18218967 PMC2259080 · DOI
  88. [96]Kazan K. Manners J.M. MYC2: The Master in Action Mol. Plant 2013 6 686 703 10.1093/mp/sss128 23142764 · DOI
  89. [97]Lorenzo O. Piqueras R. Sanchez-Serrano J.J. Solano R. ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 integrates signals from ethylene and jasmonate pathways in plant defense Plant Cell 2003 15 165 178 10.1105/tpc.007468 12509529 PMC143489 · DOI
  90. [98]Lorenzo O. Chico J.M. Sanchez-Serrano J.J. Solano R. Jasmonate-insensitive1 encodes a MYC transcription factor essential to discriminate between different jasmonate-regulated defense responses in Arabidopsis Plant Cell. 2004 16 1938 1950 10.1105/tpc.022319 15208388 PMC514172 · DOI
  91. [99]Timmermann T. Gonzalez B. Ruz G.A. Reconstruction of a gene regulatory network of the induced systemic resistance defense response in Arabidopsis using boolean networks BMC Bioinform. 2020 21 142 10.1186/s12859-020-3472-3 PMC7157984 32293239 · DOI
  92. [100]Penninckx I.A. Eggermont K. Terras F.R. Thomma B.P. De Samblanx G.W. Buchala A. Métraux J.P. Manners J.M. Broekaert W.F. Pathogen-induced systemic activation of a plant defensin gene in Arabidopsis follows a salicylic acid-independent pathway Plant Cell 1996 8 2309 2323 8989885 PMC161354
  93. [101]Manners J.M. Penninckx I.A. Vermaere K. Kazan K. Brown R.L. Morgan A. Maclean D.J. Curtis M.D. Cammue B.P.A. Broekaert W.F. The promoter of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2 from Arabidopsis is systemically activated by fungal pathogens and responds to methyl jasmonate but not to salicylic acid Plant Mol. Biol. 1998 38 1071 1080 10.1023/A:1006070413843 9869413 · DOI
  94. [102]Thomma B.P.H.J. Eggermont K. Penninckx I.A.M.A. Mauch-Mani B. Vogelsang R. Cammue B.P.A. Broekaert W.F. Separate jasmonate-dependent and salicylate-dependent defense-response pathways in Arabidopsis are essential for resistance to distinct microbial pathogens Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998 95 15107 15111 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15107 9844023 PMC24583 · DOI
  95. [103]Pieterse C.M. Van Wees S.C. Van Pelt J.A. Knoester M. Laan R. Gerrits H. Weisbeek P.J. Van Loon L.C. A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis Plant Cell 1998 10 1571 1580 10.1105/tpc.10.9.1571 9724702 PMC144073 · DOI
  96. [104]Niu D. Wang X. Wang Y. Song X. Wang J. Guo J. Zhao H. Bacillus cereus AR156 activates PAMP-triggered immunity and induces a systemic acquired resistance through a NPR1-and SA-dependent signaling pathway Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016 469 120 125 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.081 26616055 · DOI
  97. [105]Nie P. Li X. Wang S. Guo J. Zhao H. Niu D. Induced Systemic Resistance against Botrytis cinerea by Bacillus cereus AR156 through a JA/ET- and NPR1-Dependent Signaling Pathway and Activates PAMP-Triggered Immunity in Arabidopsis Front. Plant Sci. 2017 8 238 10.3389/fpls.2017.00238 28293243 PMC5329000 · DOI
  98. [106]Cao H. Glazebrook J. Clarke J.D. Volko S. Dong X.N. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats Cell 1997 88 57 63 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81858-9 9019406 · DOI
  99. [107]Cao H. Bowling S.A. Gordon A.S. Dong X. Characterization of an Arabidopsis Mutant That Is Nonresponsive to Inducers of Systemic Acquired Resistance Plant Cell 1994 6 1583 1592 10.2307/3869945 12244227 PMC160545 · DOI
  100. [108]Spoel S. Koornneef A. Claessens S.M.C. Korzelius J.P. Van Pelt J.A. Mueller M.J. Buchala A.J. Métraux J.-P. Brown R. Kazan K. NPR1 modulates cross-talk between salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent defense pathways through a novel function in the cytosol Plant Cell 2003 15 760 770 10.1105/tpc.009159 12615947 PMC150028 · DOI
  101. [109]Zhang N. Wang D. Liu Y. Li S. Shen Q. Zhang R. Effects of different plant root exudates and their organic acid components on chemotaxis, biofilm formation and colonization by beneficial rhizosphere-associated bacterial strains Plant Soil. 2014 374 689 700 10.1007/s11104-013-1915-6 · DOI
  102. [110]Rudrappa T. Czymmek K.J. Pare P.W. Bais H.P. Root-Secreted Malic Acid Recruits Beneficial Soil Bacteria Plant Physiol. 2008 148 1547 1556 10.1104/pp.108.127613 18820082 PMC2577262 · DOI
  103. [111]Hiruma K. Roles of Plant-Derived Secondary Metabolites during Interactions with Pathogenic and Beneficial Microbes under Conditions of Environmental Stress Microorganisms 2019 7 362 10.3390/microorganisms7090362 PMC6780457 31540419 · DOI
  104. [112]Szoboszlay M. White-Monsant A. Moe L.A. The effect of root exudate 7,4′-dihydroxyflavone and naringenin on soil bacterial community structure PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0146555 10.1371/journal.pone.0146555 26752410 PMC4709137 · DOI
  105. [113]Abdel-Lateif K. Bogusz D. Hocher V. The role of flavonoids in the establishment of plant roots endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi, rhizobia and Frankia bacteria Plant Signal. Behav. 2012 7 636 641 10.4161/psb.20039 22580697 PMC3442858 · DOI
  106. [114]Al-Babili S. Bouwmeester H.J. Strigolactones, a novel carotenoid-derived plant hormone Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015 66 161 186 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114759 25621512 · DOI
  107. [115]Prsic J. Ongena M. Elicitors of Plant Immunity Triggered by Beneficial Bacteria Front. Plant Sci. 2020 11 594530 10.3389/fpls.2020.594530 33304371 PMC7693457 · DOI
  108. [116]Chin-A-Woeng T.F.C. Bloemberg G.V. Lugtenberg B.J.J. Phenazines and their role in biocontrol by Pseudomonas bacteria New Phytol. 2003 157 503 523 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00686.x 33873412 · DOI
  109. [117]Finnegan T. Steenkamp P.A. Piater L.A. Dubery I.A. The Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Metabolome Signature in Arabidopsis thaliana Reveals Dynamic Reprogramming of Phytoalexin and Phytoanticipin Pathways PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0163572 10.1371/journal.pone.0163572 27656890 PMC5033345 · DOI
  110. [118]Kong H.G. Shin T.S. Kim T.H. Ryu C.-M. Stereoisomers of the Bacterial Volatile Compound 2,3-Butanediol Differently Elicit Systemic Defense Responses of Pepper against Multiple Viruses in the Field Front. Plant Sci. 2018 9 90 10.3389/fpls.2018.00090 29527214 PMC5829544 · DOI
  111. [119]Tyagi S. Mulla S.I. Lee K.-J. Chae J.-C. Shukla P. VOCs-mediated hormonal signaling and crosstalk with plant growth promoting microbes Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018 38 1277 1296 10.1080/07388551.2018.1472551 29862848 · DOI · Paper page
  112. [120]Cellini A. Spinelli F. Donati I. Ryu C.M. Kloepper J.W. Bacterial volatile compound-based tools for crop management and quality Trends Plant Sci. 2021 26 968 983 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.05.006 34147324 · DOI
  113. [121]Garbeva P. Weisskopf L. Airborne medicine: Bacterial volatiles and their influence on plant health New Phytol. 2020 226 32 43 10.1111/nph.16282 31651035 · DOI
  114. [123]Melotto M. Underwood W. Koczan J. Nomura K. He S.Y. Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion Cell 2006 126 969 980 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.054 16959575 · DOI
  115. [124]Park S.-Y. Fung P. Nishimura N. Jensen D.R. Fujii H. Zhao Y. Lumba S. Santiago J. Rodrigues A. Chow T.-F.F. Abscisic Acid Inhibits Type 2C Protein Phosphatases via the PYR/PYL Family of START Proteins Science 2009 324 1068 1071 10.1126/science.1173041 19407142 PMC2827199 · DOI
  116. [125]Ma Y. Szostkiewicz I. Korte A. Moes D. Yang Y. Christmann A. Grill E. Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors Science 2009 324 1266 10.1126/science.1172408 19407143 · DOI
  117. [126]Umezawa T. Sugiyama N. Mizoguchi M. Hayashi S. Myouga F. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Ishihama Y. Hirayama T. Shinozaki K. Type 2C protein phosphatases directly regulate abscisic acid-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009 106 17588 17593 10.1073/pnas.0907095106 19805022 PMC2754379 · DOI
  118. [127]Geiger D. Scherzer S. Mumm P. Stange A. Marten I. Bauer H. Ache P. Matschi S. Liese A. Al-Rasheid K.A.S. Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is controlled by drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009 106 21425 21430 10.1073/pnas.0912021106 19955405 PMC2795561 · DOI
  119. [128]Brandt B. Brodsky D.E. Xue S. Negi J. Iba K. Kangasjärvi J. Ghassemian M. Stephan A.B. Hu H. Schroeder J.I. Reconstitution of abscisic acid activation of SLAC1 anion channel by CPK6 and OST1 kinases and branched ABI1 PP2C phosphatase action Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012 109 10593 10598 10.1073/pnas.1116590109 22689970 PMC3387046 · DOI
  120. [129]Lee S.C. Lan W. Buchanan B.B. Luan S. A protein kinase-phosphatase pair interacts with an ion channel to regulate ABA signaling in plant guard cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009 106 21419 21424 10.1073/pnas.0910601106 19955427 PMC2795491 · DOI
  121. [130]Pei Z.M. Murata Y. Benning G. Thomine S. Klüsener B. Allen G.J. Grill E. Schroeder J.I. Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells Nature 2000 406 731 734 10.1038/35021067 10963598 · DOI · Paper page
  122. [131]Sirichandra C. Gu D. Hu H.-C. Davanture M. Lee S. Djaoui M. Valot B. Zivy M. Leung J. Merlot S. Phosphorylation of the Arabidopsis AtrbohF NADPH oxidase by OST1 protein kinase FEBS Lett. 2009 583 2982 2986 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.08.033 19716822 · DOI
  123. [132]Raghavendra A.S. Gonugunta V.K. Christmann A. Grill E. ABA perception and signalling Trends Plant Sci. 2010 15 395 401 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.04.006 20493758 · DOI
  124. [133]Montillet J.-L. Leonhardt N. Mondy S. Tranchimand S. Rumeau D. Boudsocq M. Garcia A.V. Douki T. Bigeard J. Laurière C. An Abscisic Acid-Independent Oxylipin Pathway Controls Stomatal Closure and Immune Defense in Arabidopsis PLoS Biol. 2013 11 e1001513 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001513 23526882 PMC3602010 · DOI
  125. [134]Wu L. Li X. Ma L. Borriss R. Wu Z. Gao X. Acetoin and 2,3-butanediol from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens induce stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana benthamiana J. Exp. Bot. 2018 69 5625 5635 10.1093/jxb/ery326 30295868 · DOI
  126. [135]Xie S. Jiang H. Ding T. Xu Q. Chai W. Cheng B. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 represses plant miR846 to induce systemic resistance via a jasmonic acid-dependent signalling pathway Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018 19 1612 1623 10.1111/mpp.12634 29090851 PMC6638179 · DOI
  127. [136]Fu Z.Q. Dong X.N. Systemic Acquired Resistance: Turning Local Infection into Global Defense Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013 64 839 863 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105606 23373699 · DOI
  128. [137]De Meyer G. Capieau K. Audenaert K. Buchala A. Métraux J.P. Höfte M. Nanogram amounts of salicylic acid produced by the rhizobacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 activate the systemic acquired resistance pathway in bean Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1999 12 450 458 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.5.450 10226378 · DOI
  129. [138]Tena G. Boudsocq M. Sheen J. Protein kinase signaling networks in plant innate immunity Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011 14 519 529 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.05.006 21704551 PMC3191242 · DOI
  130. [139]Pieterse C.M. Van Pelt J.A. Ton J. Parchmannb S. Mueller M.J. Buchala A.J. Métrauxc J.P. Van Loon L.C. Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis requires sensitivity to jasmonate and ethylene but is not accompanied by an increase in their production Physiol. Mol. Plant P. 2000 57 123 134 10.1006/pmpp.2000.0291 · DOI
  131. [140]Carvalhais L.C. Dennis P.G. Badri D.V. Tyson G.W. Vivanco J.M. Schenk P.M. Activation of the Jasmonic Acid Plant Defence Pathway Alters the Composition of Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities PLoS ONE 2013 8 e56457 23424661 PMC3570460
  132. [141]Yalpani N. Silverman P. Wilson T.M.A. Kleier D.A. Raskin I. Salicylic acid is a systemic signal and an inducer of pathogenesis-related proteins in virus-infected tobacco Plant Cell 1991 3 809 818 1820820 PMC160048
  133. [142]Glazebrook J. Genes controlling expression of defense responses in Arabidopsis Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001 4 301 308 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00177-1 11418339 · DOI
  134. [143]Nawrath C.J. Metraux P. Salicylic acid induction-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis express PR-2 and PR-5 and accumulate high levels of camalexin after pathogen inoculation Plant Cell 1999 11 1393 1404 10449575 PMC144293
  135. [144]Glazebrook J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005 43 205 227 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923 16078883 · DOI
  136. [145]Zhang W. Zhao F. Jiang L. Chen C. Wu L. Liu Z. Different Pathogen Defense Strategies in Arabidopsis: More than Pathogen Recognition Cells 2018 7 252 10.3390/cells7120252 30544557 PMC6315839 · DOI
  137. [146]Li N. Han X. Feng D. Yuan D. Huang L.-J. Signaling Crosstalk between Salicylic Acid and Ethylene/Jasmonate in Plant Defense: Do We Understand What They Are Whispering? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20 671 10.3390/ijms20030671 30720746 PMC6387439 · DOI
  138. [147]Meng X.Z. Zhang S.Q. MAPK Cascades in Plant Disease Resistance Signaling Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013 51 245 266 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102314 23663002 · DOI
  139. [148]Schweighofer A. Meskiene I. Regulation of stress hormones jasmonates and ethylene by MAPK pathways in plants Mol. Biosyst. 2008 4 799 803 10.1039/b718578m 18633480 · DOI
  140. [149]Wan J.R. Zhang S.Q. Stacey G. Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in Arabidopsis by chitin Mol. Plant Pathol. 2004 5 125 135 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00215.x 20565589 · DOI
  141. [150]Asai T. Tena G. Plotnikova J. Willmann M.R. Chiu W.-L. Gomez-Gomez L. Boller T. Ausubel F.M. Sheen J. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity Nature 2002 415 977 983 10.1038/415977a 11875555 · DOI
  142. [151]Asai S. Ohta K. Yoshioka H. MAPK signaling regulates nitric oxide and NADPH oxidase-dependent oxidative bursts in Nicotiana benthamiana Plant Cell 2008 20 1390 1406 10.1105/tpc.107.055855 18515503 PMC2438462 · DOI
  143. [152]Van Wees S.C. De Swart E.A. Van Pelt J.A. Van Loon L.C. Pieterse C.M. Enhancement of induced disease resistance by simultaneous activation of salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000 97 8711 8716 10.1073/pnas.130425197 10890883 PMC27013 · DOI
  144. [153]Mattick J.S. Makunin I.V. Non-coding RNA Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006 15 R17 R29 10.1093/hmg/ddl046 16651366 · DOI
  145. [154]Katiyar-Agarwal S. Jin H.L. Role of Small RNAs in Host-Microbe Interactions Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010 48 225 246 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114457 20687832 PMC3752435 · DOI
  146. [155]Rogers K. Chen X. Biogenesis, Turnover, and Mode of Action of Plant MicroRNAs Plant Cell. 2013 25 2383 2399 10.1105/tpc.113.113159 23881412 PMC3753372 · DOI
  147. [156]Zhang X. Yuan Y.R. Pei Y. Lin S.S. Tuschl T. Patel D.J. Chua N.H. Cucumber mosaic virus-encoded 2b suppressor inhibits Arabidopsis Argonaute1 cleavage activity to counter plant defense Genes Dev. 2006 20 3255 3268 10.1101/gad.1495506 17158744 PMC1686603 · DOI
  148. [157]Chen L. Meng J. Zhai J.M. Xu P.S. Luan Y.S. MicroRNA396a-5p and-3p induce tomato disease susceptibility by suppressing target genes and upregulating salicylic acid Plant Sci. 2017 265 177 187 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.10.004 29223339 · DOI
  149. [158]Navarro L. Dunoyer P. Jay F. Arnold B. Dharmasiri N. Estelle M. Voinnet O. Jones J.D.G. A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signaling Science 2006 312 436 439 10.1126/science.1126088 16627744 · DOI
  150. [159]Park J.H. Shin C. The role of plant small RNAs in NB-LRR regulation Brief. Funct. Genom. 2015 14 268 274 10.1093/bfgp/elv006 25777149 · DOI
  151. [160]Jiang C. Fan Z. Li Z. Niu D. Li Y. Zheng M. Wang Q. Jin H. Guo J. Bacillus cereus AR156 triggers induced systemic resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 by suppressing miR472 and activating CNLs-mediated basal immunity in Arabidopsis Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020 21 854 870 32227587 PMC7214473
  152. [161]Xie S. Yu H. Li E. Wang Y. Liu J. Jiang H. Identification of miRNAs Involved in Bacillus velezensis FZB42-Activated Induced Systemic Resistance in Maize Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20 5057 10.3390/ijms20205057 PMC6829523 31614702 · DOI
  153. [163]Fire A. Xu S. Montgomery M.K. Kostas S.A. Driver S.E. Mello C.C. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans Nature 1998 391 806 811 10.1038/35888 9486653 · DOI · Paper page
  154. [164]Weiberg A. Wang M. Lin F.-M. Zhao H. Zhang Z. Kaloshian I. Huang H.-D. Jin H. Fungal small RNAs suppress plant immunity by hijacking host RNA interference pathways Science 2013 342 118 123 10.1126/science.1239705 24092744 PMC4096153 · DOI
  155. [165]Silvestri A. Fiorilli V. Miozzi L. Accotto G.P. Turina M. Lanfranco L. In silico analysis of fungal small RNA accumulation reveals putative plant mRNA targets in the symbiosis between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and its host plant BMC Genom. 2019 20 169 10.1186/s12864-019-5561-0 30832582 PMC6399891 · DOI
  156. [166]Weiberg A. Bellinger M. Jin H. Conversations between kingdoms: Small RNAs Curr. Opin. Bio. 2015 32 207 215 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.025 PMC4387066 25622136 · DOI
  157. [167]Koch A. Kumar N. Weber L. Keller H. Imani J. Kogel K.-H. Host-induced gene silencing of cytochrome P450 lanosterol C14alpha-demethylase-encoding genes confers strong resistance to Fusarium species Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013 110 19324 19329 10.1073/pnas.1306373110 24218613 PMC3845197 · DOI
  158. [168]Cai Q. He B. Kogel K.H. Jin H. Cross-kingdom RNA trafficking and environmental RNAi-nature’s blueprint for modern crop protection strategies Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018 46 58 64 10.1016/j.mib.2018.02.003 29549797 PMC6499079 · DOI
  159. [169]Koch A. Biedenkopf D. Furch A. Weber L. Rossbach O. Abdellatef E. Linicus L. Johannsmeier J. Jelonek L. Goesmann A. An RNAi-Based Control of Fusarium graminearum Infections through Spraying of Long dsRNAs Involves a Plant Passage and Is Controlled by the Fungal Silencing Machinery PLoS Pathog. 2016 12 e1005901 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005901 27737019 PMC5063301 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Y., Gui, Y., Li, Z., Jiang, C., Guo, J., & Niu, D.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
  • College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Corresponding author
Niu, Dongdong
ORCID
Venue
Plants
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-01-30
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
386
ISSN
2223-7747 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/plants11030386
PMC
PMC8839143
OpenAlex
W4210281910
Cited by
570
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 171 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 35
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Plants (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20211524)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072404)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
induced systemic resistance, plant immunity, beneficial microorganisms, plant-microbe interactions, systemic signaling, jasmonic acid signaling, ethylene signaling, salicylic acid signaling, small RNA, plant defense against pathogens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review