The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Halophytes: Potential Resources for Salt Stress Tolerance Genes and Promoters
Open accessAbstract
Halophytes have demonstrated their capability to thrive under extremely saline conditions and thus considered as one of the best germplasm for saline agriculture. Salinity is a worldwide problem, and the salt-affected areas are increasing day-by-day because of scanty rainfall, poor irrigation system, salt ingression, water contamination and other environmental factors. The salinity stress tolerance mechanism is a very complex phenomenon, and some pathways are coordinately linked for imparting salinity tolerance. Though a number of salt responsive genes have been reported from the halophytes, there is always a quest for promising stress-responsive genes that can modulate plant physiology according to the salt stress. Halophytes such as Aeluropus, Mesembryanthemum, Suaeda, Atriplex, Thellungiella, Cakile and Salicornia serve as a potential candidate for the salt-responsive genes and promoters. Several known genes like antiporters (NHX, SOS, HKT, VTPase), ion channels (Cl-, Ca2+, aquaporins), antioxidant encoding genes (APX, CAT, GST, BADH, SOD) and some novel genes such as USP, SDR1, SRP etc. were isolated from halophytes and explored for developing stress tolerance in the crop plants (glycophytes). It is evidenced that stress triggers salt sensors that lead to the activation of stress tolerance mechanisms which involve multiple signaling proteins, up- or down- regulation of several genes, and finally the distinctive or collective effects of stress-responsive genes. In this review, halophytes are discussed as an excellent platform for salt responsive genes which can be utilized for developing salinity tolerance in crop plants through genetic engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhu, J.-K. (2001) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01838-0 · Cited by 3,511
Salinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
Plant Sociology: the Study of Plant Communities
(1933) · Nature · doi:10.1038/132300a0 · Cited by 1,473
Slama, I., Abdelly, C., Bouchereau, A., Flowers, T., & Savouré, A. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcu239 · Cited by 937
Shabala, S. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mct205 · Cited by 857
Plant salt tolerance: adaptations in halophytes
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcu267 · Cited by 835
Genetic Analysis of Plant Salt Tolerance Using Arabidopsis
Zhu, J.-K. (2000) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.124.3.941 · Cited by 757
Sodium chloride toxicity and the cellular basis of salt tolerance in halophytes
Flowers, T. J., Munns, R., & Colmer, T. D. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcu217 · Cited by 749
Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance
Cushman, J. C., & Bohnert, H. J. (2000) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(99)00052-7 · Cited by 719
Zhang, H.-X., Hodson, J. N., Williams, J. P., & Blumwald, E. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.231476498 · Cited by 648
Cited by
Engineering salinity tolerance in plants: progress and prospects
Wani, S. H., Kumar, V., Khare, T., Guddimalli, R., Parveda, M., Solymosi, K., Suprasanna, P., & Kavi Kishor, P. B. (2020) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03366-6 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishra, A., & Tanna, B.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-05-18
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 829-829
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2616772494
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 106
- FWCI
- 24.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Halophytes: Potential Resources for Salt Stress Tolerance Genes and Promoters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2017.00829
- The paper
- Mishra, A., & Tanna, B. (2017). Halophytes: Potential Resources for Salt Stress Tolerance Genes and Promoters. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00829
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.