The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zero-Sum Bias: Perceived Competition Despite Unlimited Resources
Open accessAbstract
Zero-sum bias describes intuitively judging a situation to be zero-sum (i.e., resources gained by one party are matched by corresponding losses to another party) when it is actually non-zero-sum. The experimental participants were students at a university where students' grades are determined by how the quality of their work compares to a predetermined standard of quality rather than to the quality of the work produced by other students. This creates a non-zero-sum situation in which high grades are an unlimited resource. In three experiments, participants were shown the grade distribution after a majority of the students in a course had completed an assigned presentation, and asked to predict the grade of the next presenter. When many high grades had already been given, there was a corresponding increase in low grade predictions. This suggests a zero-sum bias, in which people perceive a competition for a limited resource despite unlimited resource availability. Interestingly, when many low grades had already been given, there was not a corresponding increase in high grade predictions. This suggests that a zero-sum heuristic is only applied in response to the allocation of desirable resources. A plausible explanation for the findings is that a zero-sum heuristic evolved as a cognitive adaptation to enable successful intra-group competition for limited resources. Implications for understanding inter-group interaction are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“People often default to thinking that someone else's gain-especially someone from a competing group-necessitates a loss to themselves, and vice versa 166,167 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [167]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 · Cited by 4,872
Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
Hawkins, D. (1945) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286866 · Cited by 3,970
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. J. (1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.002 · Cited by 3,699
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.
Brewer, M. B. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307 · Cited by 3,411
Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination
Tajfel, H. (1970) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96 · Cited by 2,577
Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment
Sherif, M. (2013) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,344
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Esses V. M. Hodson G. Dovidio J. F. (2003). “Public attitudes towards immigrants and immigration: determinants and policy implications,” in Canadian Immigration Policy for the 21st Century, eds Beach C. M. Green A. G. Reitz J. G. (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press), 507– 535
- Gigerenzer G. Todd P. M. the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart (New York: Oxford University Press).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964
The dysfunctions of power in teams: A review and emergent conflict perspective
Greer, L. L., van Bunderen, L., & Yu, S. (2017) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.005 · Cited by 156
Davidai, S., & Ongis, M. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay3761 · Cited by 152
Economic Downturns Undermine Workplace Helping by Promoting a Zero-Sum Construal of Success
Širola, N., & Pitesa, M. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0804 · Cited by 115
Kuchynka, S. L., Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., & Puryear, C. (2018) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12281 · Cited by 88
Using Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic ResponsePreprint
Bavel, J. J. V., D, K. B. A., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A. K., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4178356 · Cited by 89
Country‐level and individual‐level predictors of men's support for gender equality in 42 countries
Kosakowska‐Berezecka, N., Besta, T., Bosson, J. K., Jurek, P., Vandello, J. A., Best, D. L., Włodarczyk, A., Safdar, S. F., Zawisza, M. J., Żadkowska, M., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2696 · Cited by 77
The psychology of zero-sum beliefs
Davidai, S., & Tepper, S. J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00194-9 · Cited by 73
Win–win denial: The psychological underpinnings of zero-sum thinking.
Johnson, S. G. B., Zhang, J., & Keil, F. C. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001083 · Cited by 80
Transgender Students in Elementary Schools: How Supportive Principals Lead
Mangin, M. M. (2019) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x19843579 · Cited by 80
AI-enabled recruiting in the war for talent
Black, J. S., & van Esch, P. (2021) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.015 · Cited by 74
The impact of leader dominance on employees’ zero-sum mindset and helping behavior.
Kakkar, H., & Sivanathan, N. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000980 · Cited by 65
Majority members misperceive even “win-win” diversity policies as unbeneficial to them.
Brown, N. D., & Jacoby-Senghor, D. S. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000372 · Cited by 58
Rottman, J., Crimston, C. R., & Syropoulos, S. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12967 · Cited by 58
Wilkins, C. L., Wellman, J. D., Toosi, N. R., Miller, C. A., Lisnek, J. A., & Martin, L. A. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000363 · Cited by 60
Burleigh, T. J., Rubel, A. N., & Meegan, D. V. (2016) · Psychology and Sexuality · doi:10.1080/19419899.2016.1269020 · Cited by 46
Self-citationIf you rise, I fall: Equality is prevented by the misperception that it harms advantaged groups
Brown, N. D., Jacoby-Senghor, D. S., & Raymundo, I. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm2385 · Cited by 45
Hasson, Y., Amir, E., Sobol-Sarag, D., Tamir, M., & Halperin, E. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35235-z · Cited by 43
The Zero-Sum Fallacy in Evidence Evaluation
Pilditch, T. D., Fenton, N., & Lagnado, D. A. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618818484 · Cited by 39
Lee, J., Liu, K., & Wu, Y. (2020) · Educational Research for Policy and Practice · doi:10.1007/s10671-020-09261-x · Cited by 37
Zero-Sum Thinking and the Roots of U.S. Political Divides
Chinoy, S., Nunn, N., Sequeira, S., & Stantcheva, S. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.3386/w31688 · Cited by 29
Impact Investing: Killing Two Birds with One Stone?
Caseau, C., & Grolleau, G. (2020) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.1080/0015198x.2020.1779561 · Cited by 31
Where Is Capitalism? Unmasking Its Hidden Role in Psychology
Bettache, K. (2024) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683241287570 · Cited by 41
Jiang, X., Hu, X., Liu, Z., Sun, X., & Xue, G. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109566 · Cited by 32
Local competition sparks concerns for fairness in the ultimatum game
Barclay, P., & Stoller, B. (2014) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0213 · Cited by 29
Huang, Y., Yang, X., Li, X., & Chen, Q. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13041088 · Cited by 21
Isaac, M. S., Obermiller, C., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2021) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.1940395 · Cited by 19
Economic Inequality Fosters the Belief That Success Is Zero-Sum
Davidai, S. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231206428 · Cited by 19
Kanık, B., Uluğ, Ö. M., Solak, N., & Chayinska, M. (2022) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12553 · Cited by 17
Adverse and Advantageous Selection in the Laboratory
Ali, S. N., Mihm, M., Siga, L., & Tergiman, C. (2021) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20200304 · Cited by 16
Asymmetries in Responses to Attitude Statements: The Example of “Zero-Sum” Beliefs
Smithson, M. J., & Shou, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00984 · Cited by 16
Keeping Up with the Joneses Affects Perceptions of Distributive Justice
Burleigh, T. J., & Meegan, D. V. (2013) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0181-3 · Cited by 15
Self-citationShould You Stay Away from Strangers?
Busby, E. C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108957885 · Cited by 14
The Political Economy of Zero‐Sum Thinking
Ali, S. N., Mihm, M., & Siga, L. (2025) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta22474 · Cited by 14
Toward a cognitive science of markets: economic agents as sense-makers
Johnson, S. G. B. (2019) · Economics · doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-49 · Cited by 12
The fear of conflict leads people to systematically avoid potentially valuable zero-sum situations
Davidai, S., White, M., & Gregorich, G. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22849-y · Cited by 13
Going at it alone: Zero-sum beliefs inhibit help-seeking
Davidai, S. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104714 · Cited by 13
Burleigh, T. J., & Meegan, D. V. (2017) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-017-9414-x · Cited by 17
Self-citationChoices We Make in Times of Crisis
Waeber, P. O., Stoudmann, N., Langston, J. D., Ghazoul, J., Wilmé, L., Sayer, J. A., Nobre, C. A., Innes, J. L., Fernbach, P. M., Sloman, S. A., et al. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13063578 · Cited by 15
Piñón-O’Connor, K. E., Mullens, A. B., Debattista, J., Sanders, T., & Brömdal, A. (2023) · Discover Health Systems · doi:10.1007/s44250-023-00055-5 · Cited by 12
Cheating in online gaming spreads through observation and victimization
Kim, J. E., & Tsvetkova, M. (2021) · Network Science · doi:10.1017/nws.2021.19 · Cited by 14
Pilotti, M., Nazeeruddin, E., Mohammad, N., Daqqa, I., Abdelsalam, H., & Abdullah, M. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11132057 · Cited by 9
Leviston, Z., Dandy, J., & Jetten, J. (2020) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12384 · Cited by 8
Rye, B. J. (2024) · Sexes · doi:10.3390/sexes5020010 · Cited by 7
Universidad, E. A. N., & Gómez‐Díaz, J. A. (2016) · Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana · doi:10.12804/apl34.2.2016.05 · Cited by 7
Köck, F., Nørfelt, A., & Josiassen, A. (2024) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2024.103884 · Cited by 8
School as a Zero-Sum Game between Boys and Girls: Gender Differences in Perceptions
Sicard, A., & Martinot, D. (2018) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.158 · Cited by 6
Tham, J. C. K. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC) · doi:10.1145/3328020.3353919 · Cited by 8
Perceiver and target partisanship shift facial trustworthiness effects on likability
Malloy, C. S., Hughes, C. S., & Cassidy, B. S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33307-8 · Cited by 7
Explaining support for post-secondary educational funding for indigenous students.
Genge, O., & Day, M. V. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/cbs0000253 · Cited by 4
Sicard, A., Taillandier‐Schmitt, A., Nugier, A., & Martinot, D. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05098-8 · Cited by 4
Resolving selfish and spiteful interdependent conflict
Stewart, A. J., Pilgrim, C., & Raihani, N. (2024) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2024.0295 · Cited by 4
Updating Our Approach to Intermediate Microeconomics
Halliday, S. D., & Mamunuru, S. M. (2025) · The American Economist · doi:10.1177/05694345251353131 · Cited by 4
Question word-order influences on covariate effects: predicting zero-sum beliefs
Smithson, M. J., Shou, Y., & Yu, A. (2017) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-017-0030-z · Cited by 4
Compensatory control in public emergencies
Tingting, R. A. O., Xiaowen, Z. H. U., Shenlong, Y. A. N. G., & Bai, J. (2022) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2022.01119 · Cited by 4
Marciano, D., Krispin, E., Bourgeois‐Gironde, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2019) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004873 · Cited by 4
Zero-sum Thinking and the Roots of US Political DifferencesPreprint
Chinoy, S., Nunn, N., Sequeira, S., & Stantcheva, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4574633 · Cited by 4
Unequal Spaces, Unequal Minds: How Spatial Inequality Drives Excessive Educational Consumption
Liu, Y. (2025) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.22231 · Cited by 3
The co-occurrence of ingroup and outgroup prosociality across 121 societies
Otten, K. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2517013123 · Cited by 3
A Familiar Landscape in the Brave New World: Ethics of Cognitive Enhancement Introduction
Cakic, V. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6771-1_7 · Cited by 2
Why university social responsibility initiatives can backfire and what to do about it
Grolleau, G., Mzoughi, N., & Stadge, M. (2024) · Prometheus · doi:10.13169/prometheus.40.1.0032 · Cited by 3
Short, D. N. (2020) · American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00029157.2019.1640180 · Cited by 4
Time Perception Scale: Measurement invariance between the United States and Japan
Yakin, S., & Niiya, Y. (2023) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12594 · Cited by 3
Keeler, J. B., Baskin, M. E. B., & McKee, V. (2025) · Journal of Knowledge Management and Practice · doi:10.62477/jkmp.v25i3.523 · Cited by 3
Toward a Cognitive Science of Markets: Economic Agents As Sense-MakersPreprint
Johnson, S. G. B. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3250031 · Cited by 4
Zero-sum bias in politicized problem solving
Molnar, A. C., & Sloman, S. A. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106408 · Cited by 2
When empathy feels scarce: How zero-sum beliefs fuel depression in close relationships
Wang, M., & Ying, P.-X. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121338 · Cited by 2
Theorising Bounded Rationality in EU Policy‐Making
Figueira, F. (2024) · JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.13704 · Cited by 2
Love Doesn’t Run Out: Children and Adults Do Not View Social Resources as Inherently Zero-Sum
Wei, K., & Yang, F. (2025) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506241308656 · Cited by 3
Jurek, P., Bosson, J. K., Olech, M., Young, R. T., & Kosakowska‐Berezecka, N. (2025) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000924 · Cited by 2
Relationship of Competitiveness, Jealousy, Disgust and Envy among Medical Students
Humayon, Z., & Shoaib, S. (2019) · Cited by 2
Isolation, Group Identity and Community
Burns, R. B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1710-5_6 · Cited by 2
Large-scale network analysis reveals cheating spreads through victimization and observation.Preprint
Kim, J. E., & Tsvetkova, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Brief empathy interventions online can decrease but not increase empathic tendencies
Tagesson, A., Wallin, A., & Pärnamets, P. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00364-w · Cited by 1
Zero-sum competition in sport: a critique
Martínková, I. (2026) · Journal of the Philosophy of Sport · doi:10.1080/00948705.2026.2665629 · Cited by 1
Busby, E. C. (2021) · Cited by 1
The Nature of Schadenfreude in Consumption Contexts: A Systematic Literature Review
Okan, M., Altınigne, N., & Işıksal, D. G. (2023) · İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi · doi:10.25204/iktisad.1347649 · Cited by 1
Gender Matters: Exploring the Mental Health of Youth Experiencing Homelessness in Canada
Wadge, S., Lethby, M., Stobbe, K., Gardner, P., & Michaelson, V. E. (2024) · International Journal on Homelessness · doi:10.5206/ijoh.2023.3.16751 · Cited by 1
The Power and Peril of Awe in Leadership: Transforming Follower Identity and Behavior
McGuire, J., McAllister, D. J., Menges, J. I., & Cremer, D. D. (2025) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2022.0282 · Cited by 1
Positive Sum Design: Designing Affordances for Bias, Choice and Coordination
Gonsher, I. (2017) · Ergonomics International Journal · doi:10.23880/eoij-16000127 · Cited by 1
Sotnik, G. (2000) · doi:10.15760/etd.6123 · Cited by 1
Sarti, S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4181862 · Cited by 1
Gómez‐Díaz, J. A., & Gómez-Díaz, A. (2016)
Nioche, A., Garcia, B., Boraud, T., Rougier, N. P., & Bourgeois‐Gironde, S. (2019) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0241-x
Zero-Sum Games & Zero-Sum Frames: Employee Cognitive Consequences of Financial Firm Performance
Brown, D. A. (2019) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)
Amaral, P. R. V., Valadão, P. F., & Araújo, S. R. S. (2009) · Fiep Bulletin - online
Madsen, J. K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22145-4_3
(2018) · Advances in psychology, mental health, and behavioral studies (APMHBS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2978-1.ch002
Cantilevering the Malaise: Confusopoly in the 21st Century Employment Relationship
Desjardins, G. (2022) · Journal of Labor and Society · doi:10.1163/24714607-bja10073
Daily Negotiation and Its Effects on Short and Longer-term Well-beingPreprint
Stasi, M. D., Schweinsberg, M., & Quoidbach, J. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4wkju
Efficacious methods of restraining COVID-19 through behavioral public policy
Управителев, А. А. (2023) · Journal of the New Economic Association · doi:10.31737/22212264_2023_4_203-222
Selective High School Admissions Policies in Court: The New Battleground for Educational Diversity
Superfine, B. M., & Park, J.-H. (2025) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/736326
Principles of positive sum design
Gonsher, I., Rutter, W., Krishnaswami, A., & Schmidt, R. (2025) · Proceedings of the Design Society · doi:10.1017/pds.2025.10277
Wang, Y., Xiong, Q., Hu, Y., Bian, Y., Liu, J., Lin, W. C., Hong, Y., Zhou, C., Gai, W., Liu, S., et al. (2025) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR · doi:10.1109/ismar67309.2025.00121
Khatib, I., Amengay, A., Abdelrahman, M., & Amin, A. (2025) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/14789299251387901
Animashaun, M. A. (2026) · Journal of Central and Eastern European African Studies · doi:10.12700/jceeas.2025.5.4.422
The downside of generosity: How rare giving fosters stronger social connection
Jang, M., Chaudhry, S. J., & Ayelet Fishbach, B. (2026) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2026.104478
Metadata
- Authors
- Meegan, D. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Meegan, Daniel V.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 191-191
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3153800
- OpenAlex
- W2030747588
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- perceived competition, grade prediction, grade distribution, cognitive adaptation, intergroup interaction, resource allocation, social cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review