Cited by 229Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Early developmental changes in the timing of turn-taking: a longitudinal study of mother–infant interaction

Open access
Hilbrink, Elma E., Gattis, Merideth, Levinson, Stephen C.·2015·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

To accomplish a smooth transition in conversation from one speaker to the next, a tight coordination of interaction between speakers is required. Recent studies of adult conversation suggest that this close timing of interaction may well be a universal feature of conversation. In the present paper, we set out to assess the development of this close timing of turns in infancy in vocal exchanges between mothers and infants. Previous research has demonstrated an early sensitivity to timing in interactions (e.g., Murray and Trevarthen, 1985). In contrast, less is known about infants' abilities to produce turns in a timely manner and existing findings are rather patchy. We conducted a longitudinal study of 12 mother-infant dyads in free-play interactions at the ages of 3, 4, 5, 9, 12, and 18 months. Based on existing work and the predictions made by the Interaction Engine Hypothesis (Levinson, 2006), we expected that infants would begin to develop the temporal properties of turn-taking early in infancy but that their timing of turns would slow down at 12 months, which is around the time when infants start to produce their first words. Findings were consistent with our predictions: infants were relatively fast at timing their turn early in infancy but slowed down toward the end of the first year. Furthermore, the changes observed in infants' turn-timing skills were not caused by changes in maternal timing, which remained stable across the 3-18 months period. However, the slowing down of turn-timing started somewhat earlier than predicted: at 9 months.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01492

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pattern of turn-taking cues that mothers provide shape the emergence of babble.

    “the pattern of turn-taking cues that mothers provide shape the emergence of babble [39].”

    From Effect of maternal depression on infant-directed speech to prelinguistic infants: Implications for language development (2020) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that contingent maternal responses can improve the quality of infant vocalizations and facilitate vocal turn-taking. It does not establish that mothers’ turn-taking cues shape the emergence of babble. The General Discussion, under Reciprocity (page unavailable), also finds that changes in maternal turn-timing did not explain changes in infant turn-timing. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 40% of infant vocalisations occur in overlap with maternal speech between 3-5 months of age.

    “The rate of overlap in the non-PND group was comparable to longitudinal evidence that 40% of infant vocalisations occur in overlap with maternal speech between 3–5 months of age [39].”

    From Effect of maternal depression on infant-directed speech to prelinguistic infants: Implications for language development (2020) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Results, under “Overlap” (page not available), report that at 3, 4, and 5 months infants produced just over a third of their vocalizations in overlap with their mothers. This supports the age range and the broad comparison, but the paper does not report the figure as 40%. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Anderson B. J. Vietze P. Dokecki P. R. (1977). Reciprocity in vocal interactions of mothers and infants. Child Dev. 48 1676– 1681. 10.2307/1128534 608379 · DOI
  2. Bakeman R. Adamson L. B. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Dev. 55 1278– 1289. 10.2307/1129997 6488956 · DOI
  3. Beebe B. Alson D. Jaffe J. Feldstein S. Crown C. (1988). Vocal congruence in mother-infant play. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 17 245– 259. 10.1007/BF01686358 3411533 · DOI
  4. Bloom K. (1988). Quality of adult vocalizations affects the quality of infant vocalizations. J. Child Lang. 15 469– 480. 10.1017/S0305000900012502 3198716 · DOI
  5. Bloom K. Russell A. Wassenberg K. (1987). Turn taking affects the quality of infant vocalizations. J. Child Lang. 14 211– 227. 10.1017/S0305000900012897 3611239 · DOI
  6. Bruner J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. J. Child Lang. 2 1– 19. 10.1017/S0305000900000866 · DOI
  7. Bruner J. S. (1981). The social context of language acquisition. Lang. Commun. 1 155– 178. 10.1016/0271-5309(81)90010-0 · DOI
  8. Casillas M. Frank M. C. (2013). “ The development of predictive processes in children’s discourse understanding,” in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, eds Knauff M. Pauen M. Sebanz N. Wachsmuth I. (Austin, TX: Cognitive Society), 299– 304.
  9. Elias G. Broerse J. (1996). Developmental changes in the incidence and likelihood of simultaneous talk during the first two years: a question of function. J. Child Lang. 23 201– 217. 10.1017/S0305000900010151 8733567 · DOI
  10. Elias G. Hayes A. Broerse J. (1986). Maternal control of co-vocalization and inter-speaker silences in mother-infant vocal engagements. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 27 409– 415. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1986.tb01842.x 3733920 · DOI
  11. Ellis-Davies K. Sakkalou E. Fowler N. C. Hilbrink E. E. Gattis M. (2012). CUE: the continuous unified electronic diary method. Behav. Res. Methods 44 1063– 1078. 10.3758/s13428-012-0205-1 22648694 · DOI
  12. Garvey C. Berninger G. (1981). Timing and turn taking in children’s conversations. Discourse Process. 4 27– 57. 10.1080/01638538109544505 · DOI
  13. Ginsburg G. P. Kilbourne B. (1988). Emergence of vocal alternation in mother-infant interchanges. J. Child Lang. 15 221– 235. 10.1017/S0305000900012344 3209641 · DOI
  14. Goldstein M. H. King A. P. West M. J. (2003). Social interaction shapes babbling: testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 8030– 8035. 10.1073/pnas.1332441100 12808137 PMC164707 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hilbrink E. Sakkalou E. Ellis-Davies K. Fowler N. Gattis M. (2013). Selective and faithful imitation at 12 and 15 months. Dev. Sci. 16 828– 840. 10.1111/desc.12070 24118710 · DOI
  16. Hoicka E. K. Akhtar N. (2011). Preschoolers joke with jokers, but correct foreigners. Dev. Sci. 14 848– 858. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01033.x 21676103 · DOI
  17. Hsu H. Fogel A. (2003). Stability and transitions in mother-infant face-to-face communication during the first 6 months: a microhistorical approach. Dev. Psychol. 39 1061– 1082. 10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1061 14584985 · DOI
  18. Hsu H. Fogel A. Messinger D. S. (2001). Infant non-distress vocalization during mother-infant face-to-face interaction: factors associated with quantitative and qualitative differences. Infant Behav. Dev. 24 107– 128. 10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00061-3 · DOI
  19. Jaffe J. Beebe B. Feldstein S. Crown C. Jasnow M. D. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: coordinated timing in development. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 66 1– 8. 11428150
  20. Jasnow M. Feldstein S. (1986). Adult-like temporal characteristics of mother-infant vocal interactions. Child Dev. 57 754– 761. 10.2307/1130352 3720401 · DOI
  21. Kaye K. (1977). “ Toward the origin of dialogue,” in Studies in Mother-Infant Interaction, ed. Schaffer H. R. (London: Academic Press), 89– 117.
  22. Kaye K. Fogel A. (1980). The temporal structure of face-to-face communication between mother and infants. Dev. Psychol. 16 454– 464. 10.1037/0012-1649.16.5.454 · DOI
  23. Levinson S. C. (2013). “ Action formation and ascription,” in The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, eds Stivers T. Sidnell J. (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell), 103– 130.
  24. Masataka N. (1993). Effects of contingent and noncontingent maternal stimulation on the vocal behavior of three- to four-month-old Japanese infants. J. Child Lang. 20 303– 312. 10.1017/S0305000900008291 8376471 · DOI
  25. Ratner N. Bruner J. (1978). Games, social exchanges and the acquisition of language. J. Child Lang. 5 391– 401. 10.1017/S0305000900002063 701416 · DOI
  26. Rochat P. Querido J. G. Striano T. (1999). Emerging sensitivity to the timing and structure of protoconversation in early infancy. Dev. Psychol. 35 950– 957. 10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.950 10442864 · DOI
  27. Rosenthal M. K. (1982). Vocal dialogues in the neonatal period. Dev. Psychol. 18 17– 21. 10.1037/0012-1649.18.1.17 · DOI
  28. Rutter D. R. Durkin K. (1987). Turn-taking in mother-infant interaction: an examination of vocalizations and gaze. Dev. Psychol. 23 54– 61. 10.1037/0012-1649.23.1.54 · DOI
  29. Sloetjes H. Wittenburg P. (2008). “ Annotation by category – ELAN, and ISO DCR,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Marrakech: LREC 2008).
  30. Snow C. E. (1977). The development of conversation between mothers and babies. J. Child Lang. 4 1– 22. 10.1017/S0305000900000453 · DOI
  31. Stivers T. Enfield N. J. Brown P. Englert C. Hayashi M. Heinemann T. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 10587– 10592. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106 19553212 PMC2705608 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Striano T. Henning A. Stahl D. (2006). Sensitivity to interpersonal timing at 3 and 6 months of age. Interact. Stud. 7 251– 271. 10.1075/is.7.2.08str · DOI
  33. ten Bosch L. Oostdijk N. Boves L. (2005). On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Commun. 47 80– 86. 10.1016/j.specom.2005.05.009 · DOI
  34. Thorgrimsson G. (2014). Infants’ Understanding of Communication as Participants and Observers. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hilbrink, E. E., Gattis, M., & Levinson, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Hilbrink, Elma E.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2015-09-29
Volume
6
Pages
1492-1492
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132951686
Cited by
229
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
21.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (269484)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
turn-taking, mother-infant interaction, infant language development, conversational timing, first words, free play, longitudinal development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review