The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Affordances and Landscapes: Overcoming the Nature–Culture Dichotomy through Niche Construction Theory
Abstract
In this paper we reject the nature-culture dichotomy by means of the idea of affordance or possibility for action, which has important implications for landscape theory. Our hypothesis is that, just as the idea of affordance can serve to overcome the subjective-objective dichotomy, the ideas of landscape and ecological niche, properly defined, would allow us to also transcend the nature-culture dichotomy. First, we introduce an overview of landscape theory, emphasizing processual landscape theory as the most suitable approach for satisfying both cultural and naturalist approaches. After that, we introduce the idea of affordance and we analyze a tension between sociocultural and transcultural affordances (affordances that depend on cultural conventions and affordances that depend on lawful information and bodily aspects of agents). This tension has various implications for landscape theory and ecological niches. Our proposal is that sociocultural and transcultural aspects of affordances could be systematically accommodated if we apply niche construction theory (the theory that explains the process by which organisms modify their selective environments) as a methodological framework for explaining the emergence of ecological niches. This approach will lead us to an integrative account of landscapes as the products of the interaction between human and environmental elements, making it a clear example of a concept that transcends the nature-culture dichotomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures


Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Hence, landscape affordances are non-material, relative environmental properties that interact with and are perceived through the individual (Heras-Escribano and de Pinedo-García 2017).”
From From landscape affordances to landscape connectivity: contextualizing an archaeology of human ecology (2020) · cites this paper as Heras-Escribano and de Pinedo-García 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developmental Plasticity and Evolution
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195122343.001.0001 · Cited by 6,115
A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2524.001.0001 · Cited by 3,470
The Perception of the Environment
Ingold, T. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203466025 · Cited by 3,356
(2003) · Cited by 2,898
The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-4305 · Cited by 2,443
A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision
Lee, D. N. (1976) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p050437 · Cited by 2,094
Radical Embodied Cognitive Science
Chemero, A. P. (2009) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001 · Cited by 1,899
Evolution the Modern Synthesis
Schmidt, K. P., & Huxley, J. (1943) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1438156 · Cited by 1,790
The Power of Movement in Plants
Darwin, C., & Darwin, F. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511693670 · Cited by 1,533
A Rich Landscape of Affordances
Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1080/10407413.2014.958035 · Cited by 1,160
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Bensusan, 2016, Being Up for Grabs.
- Dobzhansky, 1937, Genetics and the Origins of the Species.
- Fowler, 2001, “Cultural landscape: great concept, pity about the phrase,” in, The Cultural Landscape. Planning for a sustainable partnership between people and place, 64
- Godfrey-Smith, 2001, “Organism, environment, and dialectics,” in, Thinking about Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives, 253
- Laland, 2003, Niche Construction: The Missing Process in Evolution.
- Lewontin, 1985, “The organism as the subject and object of evolution,” in, The Dialectical Biologist, 85
- McDowell, 1994, Mind and World.
- Michaels, 1981, Direct Perception.
- Nudsen, 2013, From Pasture to Gallery / Henry Moore: Late Large Forms.
- Ortega y Gasset, 1929, La rebelión de las masas.
- Pungetti, 1996, Landscape Research for Ecologically Sound Planning of Mediterranean Rural Areas.
- Richardson, 2008, “Ecological psychology: six principles for an embodied-embedded approach to behavior,” in, Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach
- Wagner, 1997, An Interview with Eduardo Chillida.
- Whitehead, 1929, Process and Reality.
Cited by
Kempf, M. (2020) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-020-01157-4 · Cited by 30
Human innovation and the creative agency of the world in the age of generative AI
Peschl, M. F. (2024) · Possibility Studies & Society · doi:10.1177/27538699241238049 · Cited by 30
Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview
(2020) · doi:10.3390/su12176881 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Heras-Escribano, M., & De Pinedo-García, M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-01-09
- Volume
- 8
- ISSN
- 1664-1078
- PMC
- PMC5767241
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 64
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FFI2016-80088-P, FFI2014-57258-P)
- Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (Fondecyt Posdoctorado 3170685)
- Universidad de Granada (FiloLab Group of Excellence)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affordances and Landscapes: Overcoming the Nature–Culture Dichotomy through Niche Construction Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02294
- The paper
- Heras-Escribano, M., & De Pinedo-García, M. (2018). Affordances and Landscapes: Overcoming the Nature–Culture Dichotomy through Niche Construction Theory. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.