Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Affordances and Landscapes: Overcoming the Nature–Culture Dichotomy through Niche Construction Theory

Heras-Escribano, Manuel, De Pinedo-García, Manuel·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

In this paper we reject the nature-culture dichotomy by means of the idea of affordance or possibility for action, which has important implications for landscape theory. Our hypothesis is that, just as the idea of affordance can serve to overcome the subjective-objective dichotomy, the ideas of landscape and ecological niche, properly defined, would allow us to also transcend the nature-culture dichotomy. First, we introduce an overview of landscape theory, emphasizing processual landscape theory as the most suitable approach for satisfying both cultural and naturalist approaches. After that, we introduce the idea of affordance and we analyze a tension between sociocultural and transcultural affordances (affordances that depend on cultural conventions and affordances that depend on lawful information and bodily aspects of agents). This tension has various implications for landscape theory and ecological niches. Our proposal is that sociocultural and transcultural aspects of affordances could be systematically accommodated if we apply niche construction theory (the theory that explains the process by which organisms modify their selective environments) as a methodological framework for explaining the emergence of ecological niches. This approach will lead us to an integrative account of landscapes as the products of the interaction between human and environmental elements, making it a clear example of a concept that transcends the nature-culture dichotomy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02294

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 Relations between our biological constitution and our cultural practices. Cultural practices exert some pressure on our biological constitution while our biological constitution constrains the range of possible cultural practices. The two shape each other from an evolutionary approach.
FIGURE 1 Relations between our biological constitution and our cultural practices. Cultural practices exert some pressure on our biological constitution while our biological constitution constrains the range of possible cultural practices. The two shape each other from an evolutionary approach.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 2 Different interactions among an individual, her community and the ecological inheritances of her environment. Ecological inheritances are bestowed by the community with social functions that are taught to individuals via instructions, and those instructions serve to deal with the affordances available to individuals. At the same time, an individual can engage with an innovative use of an affordance and transmit it to the community (dotted line). If accepted, a new function for ecological inheritances is established.
FIGURE 2 Different interactions among an individual, her community and the ecological inheritances of her environment. Ecological inheritances are bestowed by the community with social functions that are taught to individuals via instructions, and those instructions serve to deal with the affordances available to individuals. At the same time, an individual can engage with an innovative use of an affordance and transmit it to the community (dotted line). If accepted, a new function for ecological inheritances is established.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Bensusan, 2016, Being Up for Grabs.
  2. Dobzhansky, 1937, Genetics and the Origins of the Species.
  3. Fowler, 2001, “Cultural landscape: great concept, pity about the phrase,” in, The Cultural Landscape. Planning for a sustainable partnership between people and place, 64
  4. Godfrey-Smith, 2001, “Organism, environment, and dialectics,” in, Thinking about Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives, 253
  5. Laland, 2003, Niche Construction: The Missing Process in Evolution.
  6. Lewontin, 1985, “The organism as the subject and object of evolution,” in, The Dialectical Biologist, 85
  7. McDowell, 1994, Mind and World.
  8. Michaels, 1981, Direct Perception.
  9. Nudsen, 2013, From Pasture to Gallery / Henry Moore: Late Large Forms.
  10. Ortega y Gasset, 1929, La rebelión de las masas.
  11. Pungetti, 1996, Landscape Research for Ecologically Sound Planning of Mediterranean Rural Areas.
  12. Richardson, 2008, “Ecological psychology: six principles for an embodied-embedded approach to behavior,” in, Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach
  13. Wagner, 1997, An Interview with Eduardo Chillida.
  14. Whitehead, 1929, Process and Reality.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Heras-Escribano, M., & De Pinedo-García, M.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-01-09
Volume
8
ISSN
1664-1078
Cited by
64
References
64
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FFI2016-80088-P, FFI2014-57258-P)
  • Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (Fondecyt Posdoctorado 3170685)
  • Universidad de Granada (FiloLab Group of Excellence)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affordances and Landscapes: Overcoming the Nature–Culture Dichotomy through Niche Construction Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02294
The paper
Heras-Escribano, M., & De Pinedo-García, M. (2018). Affordances and Landscapes: Overcoming the Nature–Culture Dichotomy through Niche Construction Theory. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02294

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.