CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Use of Eye-Movement Desensitization Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy in Treating Post-traumatic Stress Disorder—A Systematic Narrative Review

Open access
Wilson, Gemma, Farrell, Derek, Barron, Ian, Hutchins, Jonathan, Whybrow, Dean, Kiernan, Matthew D.·2018·Frontiers in Psychology
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00923PMC PMC5997931
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Aim: There is an extensive body of research examining the efficacy of Eye-Movement Desensitisation Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This systematic narrative review aimed to systematically, and narratively, review robust evidence from Randomised-Controlled Trials examining the efficacy of EMDR therapy. Method: Eight databases were searched to identify studies relevant to the study aim. Two separate systematic searches of published, peer-reviewed evidence were carried out, considering relevant studies published prior to April 2017. After exclusion of all irrelevant, or non-robust, studies, a total of two meta-analyses and four Randomised-Controlled Trials were included for review. Results: Data from meta-analyses and Randomised-Controlled Trials included in this review evidence the efficacy of EMDR therapy as a treatment for PTSD. Specifically, EMDR therapy improved PTSD diagnosis, reduced PTSD symptoms, and reduced other trauma-related symptoms. EMDR therapy was evidenced as being more effective than other trauma treatments, and was shown to be an effective therapy when delivered with different cultures. However, limitations to the current evidence exist, and much current evidence relies on small sample sizes and provides limited follow-up data. Conclusions: This systematic narrative review contributes to the current evidence base, and provides recommendations for practice and future research. This review highlights the need for additional research to further examine the use of EMDR therapy for PTSD in a range of clinical populations and cultural contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00923

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Systematic search process.
Figure 1 Systematic search process.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Papers retrieved as part of first systematic search.
Figure 2 Papers retrieved as part of first systematic search.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Papers retrieved as part of second systematic search.
Figure 3 Papers retrieved as part of second systematic search.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. CASP Systematic Review Checklist [online]
  2. FarrellD. P. Trans-generational trauma and EMDR therapy. BACP Journal-Private Practice Winter Edition2016
  3. Shapiro, 1995, Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, G., Farrell, D., Barron, I., Hutchins, J., Whybrow, D., & Kiernan, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • University of Worcester (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Gemma
ORCID
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2018-06-06
Volume
9
Pages
923-923
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00923
PMC
PMC5997931
OpenAlex
W2803696867
Cited by
145
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
EMDR, post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma treatment, treatment efficacy, trauma symptoms, randomized controlled trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review