The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological Behavior of Frontline Medical Staff in the Use of Preventive Medication for COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: to understand the current situation and psychological analysis of the use of self-prevention Medicine about Psychological behavior on medical staff in fighting against COVID-19. Methods: A total of 290 medical staff in fighting against COVID-19 was investigated by filling out Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) and a questionnaire was applied to investigate their Psychological behavior of self-prevention Medicine, from 10 January to 10 March 2020. Results: Among the surveyed front-line medical personnel, 77.6% used self-prophylactic Medicine. The proportions of routine prophylactic Medicine, Medicine in suspected infection and Medicine in occupational exposure were 47.6%, 40.9% and 11.6% respectively. The scores of anxiety scale on different preventive medication frequencies were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Compared with other groups, the scores of anxiety scale on special occupational exposure (exposure to respiratory pathogen and blood borne pathogens) were statistically significant. The proportions of front-line medical personnel choosing western medicine, traditional Chinese medicine and integrated traditional and western medicine for preventive COVID-19 were 24.4%, 28.0% and 47.6%. There were statistical differences in the scores of anxiety scale of different medication types (P < 0.05 ) , and the difference also has the statistically significant between the western medicine group and other groups. Conclusion: The anxiety level of people who take medicine during occupational exposure is higher. Compared with the persons who use the western medicine, the combination of Chinese and western medicine may relieve the anxiety of front-line medical staff.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Healthcare workers uniformly suffer elevated emotional distress during COVID-19.
“healthcare workers, who uniformly suffer elevated emotional distress during COVID-19”
From Fear of COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 stress and association with sociodemographic and psychological process factors in cases under surveillance in a frontline worker population in borneo (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
The Discussion section reports that 60% of the frontline medical staff studied experienced anxiety or other negative emotions, not that healthcare workers uniformly experienced distress. The study also concerns frontline staff rather than healthcare workers generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765
Lai, J., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Cai, Z., Hu, J., Wei, N., Wu, J., Du, H., Chen, T., Li, R., et al. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976 · Cited by 8,015
The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus.
Kang, L., Li, Y., Hu, S., Chen, M., Yang, C., Yang, B. X., Wang, Y., Hu, J., Lai, J., Ma, X., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30047-x · Cited by 2,061
A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19
Cortegiani, A., Ingoglia, G., Ippolito, M., Giarratano, A., & Einav, S. (2020) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.005 · Cited by 1,190
Luo, H., Tang, Q.-L., Shang, Y.-X., Liang, S.-B., Yang, M., Robinson, N., & Liu, J. (2020) · Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11655-020-3192-6 · Cited by 613
Wang, Z., Chen, X., Lu, Y., Chen, F., & Zhang, W. (2020) · BioScience Trends · doi:10.5582/bst.2020.01030 · Cited by 549
Ni, L., Zhou, L., Zhou, M., Zhao, J., & Wang, D. W. (2020) · Frontiers of Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11684-020-0757-x · Cited by 122
Ling, C. (2020) · Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.joim.2020.02.004 · Cited by 111
Timely development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2
Lu, S. (2020) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1080/22221751.2020.1737580 · Cited by 91
Trotman, G. P., Williams, S. E., Quinton, M. L., & Zanten, J. V. (2018) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.02.004 · Cited by 51
Tang, L., Zhao, X.-M., & Yu, X.-Y. (2020) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02921-7 · Cited by 8
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Ba, 2020, Hubei provincial hospital of traditional Chinese medicine COVID-19 TCM prevention and treatment program., Hunan. J. Tradit. Chin. Med., 42, 7
- 2020, Diagnosis and Treatment plan of Pneumonia related to new Coronavirus Infection (trial version 7).
- 2020, The Guideline of Psychological Crisis Intervention for COVID-19.
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report – 58.
- Infection Prevention and Control During Health Care when Novel Coronavirus (nCoV) Infection is Suspected.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pang, N. T. P., Nold Imon, G., Johoniki, E., Mohd Kassim, M. A., Omar, A., Syed Abdul Rahim, S. S., Hayati, F., Jeffree, M. S., & Ng, J. R. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18137210 · Cited by 23
Hamenyimana, S., Sulistyani, . D., Rahardjo, T., & Rahardjo, T. (2023) · Interaksi Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi · doi:10.14710/interaksi.12.2.391-405 · Cited by 1
Çeli̇k, M. Y. (2023) · Journal of Education and Research in Nursing · doi:10.14744/jern.2021.21056 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, X., Li, Y., Tang, L., Deng, L., Zhao, Y., Zhao, X., Xu, H., & Zeng, M.
- Affiliations
- Central South University (CN)
- Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Xianmei
- Xu, Huilan
- Zeng, Ming
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-09-25
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 2104-2104
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7545108
- OpenAlex
- W3088756189
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, frontline health workers, preventive medication, self-medication, anxiety, occupational exposure, traditional Chinese medicine, integrated Chinese and Western medicine, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
