Cited by 55Communication and COVID-19 ImpactPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationMisinformation and Its Impacts

Understanding Knowledgeable Workers’ Behavior Toward COVID-19 Information Sharing Through WhatsApp in Pakistan

Open access
Islam, Talat, Mahmood, Khalid, Sadiq, Misbah, Usman, Bushra, Yousaf, Sheikh Usman·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Using social media through mobile has become a major source of disseminating information; however, the motivations that impact social media users' intention and actual information-sharing behavior need further examination. To this backdrop, drawing on the uses and gratifications theory, theory of prosocial behavior, and theory of planned behavior, we aim to examine various motivations toward information-sharing behaviors in a specific context [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)]. We collected data from 388 knowledgeable workers through Google Forms and applied structural equation modeling to test the hypotheses. We noted that individuals behave seriously toward crisis-related information, as they share COVID-19 information on WhatsApp not only to be entertained and seek status or information but also to help others. Further, we noted norms of reciprocation, habitual diversion, and socialization as motivators that augment WhatsApp users' positive attitude toward COVID-19 information-sharing behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572526

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scholars have examined information sharing and consumption on social media during the pandemic.

    “For example, scholars have examined information sharing and consumption on social media during the pandemic (Apuke and Omar, 2020, 2021; Haman, 2020; Islam et al., 2020).”

    From Virtual reality adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic: A uses and gratifications perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Islam et al., 2020

    The Introduction and Discussion describe a study of COVID-19 information sharing on WhatsApp and examine information seeking as a possible motivation for sharing. They do not describe a separate examination of information consumption, so the sharing portion is supported but the consumption portion is not. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

14 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ajzen I. (2011). “ The theory of planned behavior,” in Theory of planned behavior handbook theories of social psychology, eds Edn, eds Van Lange P. A. Kruglanski A. W. Higgins T. O. (London, UK: Sage Publications), 438.
  2. Eisenberg N. Fabes R. A. Spinrad T. L. (1998). Prosocial development. New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  3. Podsakoff P. M. MacKenzie S. B. Podsakoff N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63 539– 569. 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 21838546 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Sanstock J. W. Topical A. (2007). A Topical Approach to Life Span Development, 4th Edn New York: McGraw-Hill, 489– 491.
  5. Tabachnick B. G. Fidell L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Islam, T., Mahmood, K., Sadiq, M., Usman, B., & Yousaf, S. U.
Affiliations
  • University of the Punjab (PK)
  • Forman Christian College (PK)
Corresponding author
Islam, Talat
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-10-07
Volume
11
Pages
572526-572526
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092423743
Cited by
54
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
12.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
WhatsApp, information sharing behavior, uses and gratifications theory, theory of planned behavior, prosocial behavior, social media use, socialization, crisis communication, Pakistan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review