The DOI matches its Crossref record; 272 of the 272 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors
Open accessAbstract
The rapid advancement of new digital technologies, such as smart technology, artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, robotics, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things (IoT), is fundamentally changing the nature of work and increasing concerns about the future of jobs and organizations. To keep pace with rapid disruption, companies need to update and transform business models to remain competitive. Meanwhile, the growth of advanced technologies is changing the types of skills and competencies needed in the workplace and demanded a shift in mindset among individuals, teams and organizations. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated digitalization trends, while heightening the importance of employee resilience and well-being in adapting to widespread job and technological disruption. Although digital transformation is a new and urgent imperative, there is a long trajectory of rigorous research that can readily be applied to grasp these emerging trends. Recent studies and reviews of digital transformation have primarily focused on the business and strategic levels, with only modest integration of employee-related factors. Our review article seeks to fill these critical gaps by identifying and consolidating key factors important for an organization’s overarching digital transformation. We reviewed studies across multiple disciplines and integrated the findings into a multi-level framework. At the individual level, we propose five overarching factors related to effective digital transformation among employees: technology adoption; perceptions and attitudes toward technological change; skills and training; workplace resilience and adaptability, and work-related wellbeing. At the group-level, we identified three factors necessary for digital transformation: team communication and collaboration; workplace relationships and team identification, and team adaptability and resilience. Finally, at the organizational-level, we proposed three factors for digital transformation: leadership; human resources, and organizational culture/climate. Our review of the literature confirms that multi-level factors are important when planning for and embarking on digital transformation, thereby providing a framework for future research and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Organizational culture and leadership
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90120-5 · Cited by 16,462
The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710733115 · Cited by 12,996
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351
The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00164 · Cited by 9,381
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Bandura, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.
- Bolstad, 2003, Tools for supporting team collaboration., Paper Presened at the 47th Annual Meeting of the
- Frey, 2013, The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerization?
- Jones, 1999, Ten years later: support staff perceptions and opinions on technology in the workplace., Libr. Trends., 47, 711
- Kane, 2015, Strategy, Not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation.
- Karacay, 2018, “Talent development for industry 4.0,” in Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation., 123
- 2017, Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation.
- 2021, Five Fifty: The skillful corporaton.
- Niedzwiecka, 2017, An exploratory study into employee attitudes towards digitalization of library services in higher education., Paper Presented at the 22nd UK Academy for Information Systems Annual Conference (UKAIS 2017)
- Schwab, 2015, The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it Means and How to Respond.
- Sias, 2018, Not just for customers anymore: organization Facebook, employee social capital, and organizational identification., Int. J. Bus. Commun, 45, 1, 10.1177/2329488418765930 · doi:10.1177/2329488418765930
- Wagner, 2010, Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage.
- Welbourne, 2015, Ethnicity and cultural values as predictors of the occurrence and impact of experienced workplace incivility., J. Occup. Health Psychol, 20, 205, 10.1037/a0038277 · doi:10.1037/a0038277
- Westerman, 2014, The Nine Elements of Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Manage Reiewv.
- 2020, The Future of Jobs Report.
Cited by
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899 · Cited by 927
Kinowska, H., & Sienkiewicz, Ł. J. (2023) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-02-2022-0079 · Cited by 147
Kulichyova, A., Kazantsev, N., White, L., & Islam, N. (2025) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12395 · Cited by 38
Tanucan, J. C. M., Negrido, C. V., & Malaga, G. N. (2022) · International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.21.10.1 · Cited by 31
Sandeep, M. M., & Lavanya, V. (2026) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/jmd-03-2024-0082 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-03-23
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 620766-620766
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3137116938
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 272
- FWCI
- 71.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Funders
- Ministry of Education - Singapore
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766
- The paper
- Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021). Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.