Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 594

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 272 of the 272 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors

Open access
Trenerry, Brigid, Chng, Samuel, Wang, Yang, Suhaila, Zainal Shah, Lim, Sun Sun, Lu, Han Yu, Oh, Peng Ho·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The rapid advancement of new digital technologies, such as smart technology, artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, robotics, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things (IoT), is fundamentally changing the nature of work and increasing concerns about the future of jobs and organizations. To keep pace with rapid disruption, companies need to update and transform business models to remain competitive. Meanwhile, the growth of advanced technologies is changing the types of skills and competencies needed in the workplace and demanded a shift in mindset among individuals, teams and organizations. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated digitalization trends, while heightening the importance of employee resilience and well-being in adapting to widespread job and technological disruption. Although digital transformation is a new and urgent imperative, there is a long trajectory of rigorous research that can readily be applied to grasp these emerging trends. Recent studies and reviews of digital transformation have primarily focused on the business and strategic levels, with only modest integration of employee-related factors. Our review article seeks to fill these critical gaps by identifying and consolidating key factors important for an organization’s overarching digital transformation. We reviewed studies across multiple disciplines and integrated the findings into a multi-level framework. At the individual level, we propose five overarching factors related to effective digital transformation among employees: technology adoption; perceptions and attitudes toward technological change; skills and training; workplace resilience and adaptability, and work-related wellbeing. At the group-level, we identified three factors necessary for digital transformation: team communication and collaboration; workplace relationships and team identification, and team adaptability and resilience. Finally, at the organizational-level, we proposed three factors for digital transformation: leadership; human resources, and organizational culture/climate. Our review of the literature confirms that multi-level factors are important when planning for and embarking on digital transformation, thereby providing a framework for future research and practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766

Cites

272 of 272 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 272 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bandura, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.
  2. Bolstad, 2003, Tools for supporting team collaboration., Paper Presened at the 47th Annual Meeting of the
  3. Frey, 2013, The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerization?
  4. Jones, 1999, Ten years later: support staff perceptions and opinions on technology in the workplace., Libr. Trends., 47, 711
  5. Kane, 2015, Strategy, Not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation.
  6. Karacay, 2018, “Talent development for industry 4.0,” in Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation., 123
  7. 2017, Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation.
  8. 2021, Five Fifty: The skillful corporaton.
  9. Niedzwiecka, 2017, An exploratory study into employee attitudes towards digitalization of library services in higher education., Paper Presented at the 22nd UK Academy for Information Systems Annual Conference (UKAIS 2017)
  10. Schwab, 2015, The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it Means and How to Respond.
  11. Sias, 2018, Not just for customers anymore: organization Facebook, employee social capital, and organizational identification., Int. J. Bus. Commun, 45, 1, 10.1177/2329488418765930 · doi:10.1177/2329488418765930
  12. Wagner, 2010, Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage.
  13. Welbourne, 2015, Ethnicity and cultural values as predictors of the occurrence and impact of experienced workplace incivility., J. Occup. Health Psychol, 20, 205, 10.1037/a0038277 · doi:10.1037/a0038277
  14. Westerman, 2014, The Nine Elements of Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Manage Reiewv.
  15. 2020, The Future of Jobs Report.

Cited by

See all 594

Metadata

Authors
Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-03-23
Volume
12
Pages
620766-620766
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137116938
Cited by
594
References
272
FWCI
71.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
Ministry of Education - Singapore

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766
The paper
Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021). Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.