Cited by 10Language Development and DisordersPhonetics and Phonology ResearchVoice and Speech Disorders

Effect of Complexity on Speech Sound Development: Evidence From Meta-Analysis Review of Treatment-Based Studies

Open access
Maggu, Akshay R., Kager, René, To, Carol K. S., Kwan, Judy S. K., Wong, Patrick C. M.·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

In the current study, we aimed at understanding the effect of exposure to complex input on speech sound development, by conducting a systematic meta-analysis review of the existing treatment-based studies employing complex input in children with speech sound disorders. In the meta-analysis review, using a list of inclusion criteria, we narrowed 280 studies down to 12 studies. Data from these studies were extracted to calculate effect sizes that were plotted as forest plots to determine the efficacy of complexity-based treatment approaches. The outcome variables of interest were improvement on the treated and generalization to the untreated sounds. Meta-analysis revealed that the exposure to complex input not only promoted improvement in production of complex speech sounds (d = 1.08, CI = 0.98–1.19) but also facilitated the production of untreated simple speech sounds (d = 2.69, CI = 1.98–3.54). Overall, the current findings revealed that the exposure to complex input promotes acquisition of both complex and simple speech sounds. The current findings are in line with the models of language learnability. The current findings have implications in the treatment of speech sound disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651900

Cites

57 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - Levels of Evidence (2009). CEBM (March 2009). Available online at: http://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/ (accessed April 14, 2017).
  2. Wexler K. (1982). A principle theory of language acquisition, in Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, eds E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (Cambridge: CUP Archive), 288– 315. Available online at: https://www.google.com/books?hl=enandlr=andid=Dnc6AAAAIAAJandoi=fndandpg=PR7anddq=wanner+and+gleitman+langauge+acquisition+andots=cdMuvCCCa4andsig=VW-HhWXUc0XNnRX53niUOFgbz8c (accessed July 1, 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maggu, A. R., Kager, R., To, C. K. S., Kwan, J. S. K., & Wong, P. C. M.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Maggu, Akshay R.
  • Wong, Patrick C. M.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-04-28
Volume
12
Pages
651900-651900
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157663349
Cited by
10
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
speech sound development, speech sound disorders, speech sound therapy, speech sound acquisition, children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review