Cited by 327Innovative Teaching MethodsInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The Role of Experiential Learning on Students’ Motivation and Classroom Engagement

Open access
Kong, Yangtao·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Due to the birth of positive psychology in the process of education, classroom engagement has been flourished and got a remarkable role in the academic field. The other significant determining factor of success in education is motivation which is in line with classroom engagement. Moreover, based on the constructivist approach, experiential learning (EL) as a new method in education and a learner-centric pedagogy is at the center of attention, as a result of its contributions to improving the value of education which centers on developing abilities, and experiences. The current review makes an effort to consider the role of EL on students’ classroom engagement and motivation by inspecting its backgrounds and values. Subsequently, the efficacy of findings for academic experts in educational contexts is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771272

Cites

36 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiential learning is considered a more effective alternative than any other educational approach for high-impact learning as it enhances students' motivation to construct meaningful learning.

    “Experiential learning is considered a more effective alternative than any other educational approach for high-impact learning as it enhances students' motivation to construct meaningful learning (Kolb and Kolb, 2018; Kong, 2021).”

    From Designing experiential learning activities with generative artificial intelligence tools for authentic assessment (2024) · cites this paper as Kong, 2021

    The Introduction describes experiential learning as a successful method that promotes active learning and students’ motivation; the Implications and Future Directions section also links experiential activities to understanding and intrinsic motivation. But the paper does not establish that it is more effective than every other educational approach for high-impact learning. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Afida, 2012, Creativity enhancement through experiential learning, Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci., 6, 94
  2. Winsett, 2016, The impact of group experiential learning on student engagement, Acad. Bus. Res. J., 3, 7
  3. Zhai, 2017, An experiential learning perspective on students’ satisfaction model in a flipped classroom context, Educ. Technol. Soc., 20, 198

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kong, Y.
Affiliations
Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Kong, Yangtao
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-10-22
Volume
12
Pages
771272-771272
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3208291050
Cited by
327
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 7
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
experiential learning, student motivation, classroom engagement, positive psychology in education, constructivist teaching, student-centered learning, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review