Cited by 1Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and History of Science

Scaling up from sentience: Modularity, conscious broadcast, and a constitutive solution to the combination problem.

Open access
Lacalli, Thurston·2025·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Complexity in biology typically has less complex evolutionary antecedents which, for consciousness, begs the question of how a fully elaborated and unified consciousness, as we experience it, would have been scaled up from what we can assume to have been simpler, or at least different, beginnings. This poses difficulties for some theories, but is much simplified if the contents of consciousness combine in a constitutive way, so the balance between contents can be adjusted by natural selection incrementally as required, across generations, in evolutionary time. This contrasts with theories postulating an integrative solution to the combination problem, and is easiest to conceptualize by supposing that conscious sensations arise from the action of modular entities, each of which, regardless of spatial location, contributes separately to the total experience. There are, in consequence, two very different models for consciousness: that it is (1) non-modular, non-local and fully integrated at a conscious level, the more conventional view, or (2) modular, local, and constitutive, so that integrative processes operating at scale are carried out largely if not exclusively in a non-conscious mode. For a modular/constitutive model that depends on a broadcast mechanism employing a signal, what may be most important is the amplitude of the signal at its source rather than how far it is propagated, in which case each module must be structured so its output has precisely controlled characteristics and adequate amplitude. A model based on signal amplitude rather than propagation over distance would still require that conscious sensations adapted to serve memory accompany cognitive functions over which they exert only indirect control, including language and thought, but fails to explain how a localized signal comes to be perceived as pervasive and global in character. In contrast, the problem with integrative models is the assumption that consciousness acts globally and only globally, which risks misdirecting attention, both in theory and experiment, to anatomical structures and neurophysiological processes that may have little to do with the processes by which conscious sensations are produced or how brains come to be aware of them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1648930

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baluška F. Levin M. (2016). On having no head: cognition throughout biological systems. Front. Psychol. 7: 902. doi: 10.3389/fpgyg.2016.00902 27445884 PMC4914563 · DOI
  2. Goff P. (2009). Why panpsychism doesn’t help explain consciousness. Dialectica 69, 289– 311. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01146.x · DOI
  3. Irwin L. N. (2023). What current theories of consciousness are missing. Neurol. Neurosci. 4, 1– 4. doi: 10.33425/26927918.1059 · DOI
  4. Merker B. (2013). The efference cascade, consciousness, and its self: naturalizing the first person pivot of action control. Front. Psychol. 4: 50. doi: 10.3389/fpsgy.2013.00501 23950750 PMC3738861 · DOI

Authors
Lacalli, T.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Lacalli, Thurston
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-09-19
Volume
16
Pages
1648930-1648930
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414365934
Cited by
1
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
combination problem, consciousness, modularity, signal amplitude, evolution of consciousness, global workspace theory, neural basis of consciousness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review