Cited by 13Hallucinations in medical conditionsSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Inner Speech is not so Simple: A Commentary on Cho and Wu (2013)

Open access
Moseley, Peter, Wilkinson, Sam·2014·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

We welcome Cho and Wu’s (1) suggestion that the study of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) could be improved by contrasting and testing more explanatory models. However, we have some worries both about their criticisms of inner speech-based self-monitoring (ISS) models and whether their proposed spontaneous activation (SA) model is explanatory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00042

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attempts to evaluate the inner speech model of AVHs have been limited by impoverished conceptions of inner speech and inappropriate methods for eliciting it.

    “Attempts to evaluate the inner speech model of AVHs have also been limited by impoverished conceptions of inner speech and inappropriate methods for eliciting it (Jones & Fernyhough, 2007; Moseley & Wilkinson, 2014).”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Moseley & Wilkinson, 2014

    In the paper’s main text (page unavailable), Moseley and Wilkinson argue that critiques of the inner-speech model rely on an overly simple conception of inner speech. They also mention potential problems with one study’s introspective measures, but do not say that attempts to test the model were limited by inappropriate methods for eliciting inner speech. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [1]Cho R Wu W Mechanisms of auditory verbal hallucination in schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry (2013) 4: 155 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00155 24348430 PMC3841756 · DOI
  2. [2]Langdon R Jones SR Connaughton E Fernyhough C The phenomenology of inner speech: comparison of schizophrenia patients with auditory verbal hallucinations and healthy controls. Psychol Med (2009) 39(4): 655– 63 10.1017/S0033291708003978 18667096 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]McCarthy-Jones SR Fernyhough C The varieties of inner speech: links between quality of inner speech and psychopathological variables in a sample of young adults. Conscious Cogn (2011) 20(4): 1586– 93 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.005 21880511 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Fernyhough C Alien voices and inner dialogue: towards a developmental account of auditory verbal hallucinations. New Ideas Psychol (2004) 22(1): 49– 68 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]McCarthy-Jones SR Hearing Voices: the Histories, Causes and Meanings of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2012).
  6. [7]Gould LN Verbal hallucinations and activation of vocal musculature. Am J Psychiatry (1948) 105: 367– 72 18890908
  7. [8]McGuigan F Covert oral behaviour and auditory hallucinations. Psychophysiology (1966) 3: 73– 80 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1966.tb02682.x 5942876 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Gould LN Verbal hallucinations as automatic speech – the reactivation of dormant speech habit. Am J Psychiatry (1950) 107(2): 110– 9 15432759
  9. [10]Watkins KE Strafella AP Paus T Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia (2003) 41: 989– 994 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00316-0 12667534 · DOI
  10. [11]Bick P Kinsbourne M Auditory hallucinations and subvocalizations in schizophrenics. Am J Psychiatry (1987) 14: 222– 5 3812794
  11. [12]Bancaud J Talairach J Geier S Bonis A Trottier S Manrique M Manifestations comportementales induites par la stimulation electrique du gyrus cingulaire anterieur chez l’homme. Rev Neurol (1976) 132: 705– 24 1006011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moseley, P., & Wilkinson, S.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Moseley, Peter
  • Wilkinson, Sam
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2014-04-22
Volume
5
Pages
42-42
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117659201
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (098455, WT098455MA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
auditory verbal hallucinations, inner speech, explanatory models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review