Cited by 18Hallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and PsychiatryPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Auditory verbal hallucinations and inner speech: a predictive processing perspective

Open access
Wilkinson, Sam, Fernyhough, Charles·2017·Before Consciousness : In Search of the Fundamentals of Mind

Abstract

Inner speech is a pervasive feature of our conscious lives.1 But what is \ninner speech, and what happens in unconscious processing that makes \nit the conscious experience that it is? A clue to answering this can be \nfound in cases where the mechanisms that produce inner speaking \nbehave unusually. In this paper, we suggest an account of a specific \ninstance of this, namely, a particular subtype of auditory verbal hallucination \n(AVH), and draw some lessons about the processes that underlie \nnormal inner speech.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26530/oapen_1001597

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predictive processing accounts of inner speech have begun to emerge.

    “However, predictive processing accounts of IS have begun to emerge [46]”

    From Inner speech as language process and cognitive tool (2023) · cites this paper as [46]

  • Predictive processing accounts of inner speech are not yet highly developed, perhaps owing to greater challenges that such models face in understanding 'offline' cognition in comparison to processes where perceptual inputs and action outputs are tightly linked.

    “Predictive processing accounts of IS are not yet highly developed, perhaps owing to the greater challenges that such models face in understanding 'offline' cognition (such as internal imagery and mind-wandering) in comparison to processes where perceptual inputs and action outputs are tightly linked [45].”

    From Inner speech as language process and cognitive tool (2023) · cites this paper as [45]

  • The ConDialInt model is compatible with many hypotheses of Wilkinson and Fernyhough's predictive account but differs in several ways.

    “Our own model is compatible with many of their hypotheses, but slightly differs in a number of ways.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkinson, S., & Fernyhough, C.
Venue
Before Consciousness : In Search of the Fundamentals of Mind
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2737240408
Cited by
18
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Imprint Academic eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
auditory verbal hallucinations, inner speech, predictive processing, consciousness, unconscious processes, subjective experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review