The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug Addiction: From Neuroscience to Ethics
Open accessAbstract
In the present paper, we suggest a potential new ethical analysis of addiction focusing on the relationship between aware and unaware processing in the brain. We take the case of the opioids epidemics to argue that a consideration of both aware and unaware processing provides a more comprehensive ethical framework to discuss the ethical issues raised by addiction. Finally, our hypothesis is that in addition to identified Central Nervous System's neuronal/neurochemical factors contributing to addictive dynamics, the socio-economic status plays a causal role through epigenetic processes, originating the need for additional reward in the brain. This provides a strong base for a socio-political form of responsibility for preventing and managing addiction crisis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Addiction may lead to disruption of the chemical balance critical for self-awareness and self-control, which can indirectly predispose a mother to abuse or neglect her child(ren).
“Finally, addiction may lead to disruption of the chemical balance critical for self-awareness and self-control (92), which can indirectly predispose a mother to abuse or neglect her child(ren).”
From Mothering, Substance Use Disorders and Intergenerational Trauma Transmission: An Attachment-Based Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as [92]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction
Volkow, N. D., Koob, G. F., & McLellan, A. T. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1511480 · Cited by 2,008
Addiction Is a Brain Disease, and It Matters
Leshner, A. I. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5335.45 · Cited by 1,615
The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: Results of an Internet-based survey
Johannes, C. B., Le, T. K., Zhou, X., Johnston, J. A., & Dworkin, R. H. (2010) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.002 · Cited by 1,252
Nicotine addiction and nicotinic receptors: lessons from genetically modified mice
Changeux, J.-P. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2849 · Cited by 453 · cited 1×
“, a moving from self-awareness to unchecked goal-directed actions (36).”
BackgroundSelf-citationInciardi, J. A., Surratt, H. L., Cicero, T. J., & Beard, R. A. (2009) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00603.x · Cited by 229
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Thibaut, 2017, Addictive behaviors: where do we stand, and where are we going?, Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 19, 215, 10.31887/DCNS.2017.19.3/fthibaut · DOI
- George, 2017, Individual differences in the neuropsychopathology of addiction, Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 19, 217, 10.31887/DCNS.2017.19.3/gkoob · DOI
- Lewis, 2015, The Biology of Desire: Why Addiction Is Not a Disease., 238
- Hall, 2015, The brain disease model of addiction: is it supported by the evidence and has it delivered on its promises?, Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 105, 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00126-6 · DOI
- Lewis, 2017, Addiction and the brain: development, not disease, Neuroethics, 10, 7, 10.1007/s12152-016-9293-4 · DOI
- Satel, 2013, Addiction and the brain-disease fallacy, Front Psychiatry, 4, 141, 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00141 · DOI
- Volkow, 2016, Opioid abuse in chronic pain–misconceptions and mitigation strategies, N Engl J Med, 374, 1253, 10.1056/NEJMra1507771 · DOI
- Carter, 2012, Addiction Neuroethics : The Ethics of Addiction Neuroscience Research and Treatment., 320
- Carter, 2015, What is addiction neuroethics?, 995, 10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_67 · DOI
- Cicero, 2017, The prescription opioid epidemic: a review of qualitative studies on the progression from initial use to abuse, Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 19, 259, 10.31887/DCNS.2017.19.3/tcicero · DOI
- Calabresi, Why America Can't Kick Its Painkiller Problem, Time
- Time
- Compton, 2015, Prescription opioid abuse: problems and responses, Prev Med, 80, 5, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.003 · DOI
- Shei, 2015, Sources of prescription opioids among diagnosed opioid abusers, Curr Med Res Opin, 31, 779, 10.1185/03007995.2015.1016607 · DOI
- Phillips, 2000, JCAHO pain management standards are unveiled. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, JAMA, 284, 428, 10.1001/jama.284.4.423b · DOI
- Control, 2011, Vital signs: overdoses of prescription opioid pain relievers—United States, 1999–2008, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 60, 1487
- Back, 2011, Characteristics and correlates of men and women with prescription opioid dependence, Addict Behav, 36, 829, 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.03.013 · DOI
- Daniulaityte, 2012, “I'm not afraid of those ones just 'cause they've been prescribed”: perceptions of risk among illicit users of pharmaceutical opioids, Int J Drug Policy, 23, 374, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.01.012 · DOI
- Rigg, 2013, Understanding the etiology of prescription opioid abuse: implications for prevention and treatment, Qual Health Res, 23, 963, 10.1177/1049732313488837 · DOI
- Chambers, 2003, Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: a critical period of addiction vulnerability, Am J Psychiatry, 160, 1041, 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1041 · DOI · Paper page
- Mistry, 2014, Genetics of opioid dependence: a review of the genetic contribution to opioid dependence, Curr Psychiatry Rev, 10, 156, 10.2174/1573400510666140320000928 · DOI
- Dehaene, 2003, A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100, 8520, 10.1073/pnas.1332574100 · DOI · Paper page
- Dehaene, 2011, Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing, Neuron, 70, 200, 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Changeux, 2011, Emergent pharmacology of conscious experience: new perspectives in substance addiction, FASEB J, 25, 2098, 10.1096/fj.11-0702ufm · DOI
- Verdejo-Garcia, 2007, Negative emotion-driven impulsivity predicts substance dependence problems, Drug Alcohol Depend, 91, 213, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.025 · DOI
- Romer Thomsen, 2013, Altered paralimbic interaction in behavioral addiction, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110, 4744, 10.1073/pnas.1302374110 · DOI · Paper page
- Farisco, 2018, Neuroethics: a Conceptual Approach, Camb Q Healthc Ethics, 27, 717, 10.1017/S0963180118000208 · DOI
- Changeux, 1973, A theory of the epigenesis of neuronal networks by selective stabilization of synapses, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 70, 2974, 10.1073/pnas.70.10.2974 · DOI
- Evers, 2015, Can we be epigenetically proactive?
- Changeux, 2004, The Physiology of Truth
- Salles, 2017, Social neuroscience and neuroethics: a fruitful synergy, 531, 10.1007/978-3-319-68421-5_22 · DOI
- Evers, 2016, Proactive epigenesis and ethical innovation: a neuronal hypothesis for the genesis of ethical rules, EMBO Rep, 17, 1361, 10.15252/embr.201642783 · DOI
- Changeux, 2004, The Physiology of Truth : Neuroscience and Human Knowledge, 324
- More, 2013, The Transhumanist Reader : Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, 460, 10.1002/9781118555927 · DOI
- Piketty, 2018, Distributional national accounts: methods and estimates for the United States, Q J Econ, 133, 553, 10.1093/qje/qjx043 · DOI · Paper page
- O'Brien, 2016, Critique of Rationality. Judgement and Creativity from Benjamin to Merleau-Ponty, 10.1163/9789004272644 · DOI
- Craig, 2003, A new view of pain as a homeostatic emotion, Trends Neurosci, 26, 303, 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00123-1 · DOI
- Craig, 2002, How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body, Nat Rev Neurosci, 3, 655, 10.1038/nrn894 · DOI · Paper page
- Bonavita, 2011, Pain as an evolutionary necessity, Neurol Sci, S61, 10.1007/s10072-011-0539-y · DOI
- Cannon, 1939, The Wisdom of the Body, 19
- Nagasako, 2003, Congenital insensitivity to pain: an update, 213
- Severino, 2018, Pain Therapy guided by purpose and perspective in light of the opioid epidemic, 119
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meulewaeter, F., De Pauw, S. S. W., & Vanderplasschen, W. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00728 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Farisco, M., Evers, K., & Changeux, J.-P.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Farisco, Michele
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-11-19
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 595-595
- ISSN
- 1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6262362
- OpenAlex
- W2901006087
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Keywords
- drug addiction, opioid epidemic, epigenetics, socioeconomic status, addiction prevention, social responsibility, reward
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
