CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesAging, Health, and Disability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The care types choice in filial culture: A cross-sectional study of disabled elderly in China

Open access
Zang, Zheng·2022·Frontiers in Public Health
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.954035PMC PMC9485573
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

For the past few decades, studies of care types choice have been restricted to the scope of individual characteristics and health status. Meanwhile, the historiography of the research largely ignores the role of filial culture within China. This study sets out to examine the influence of the factors in the cultural context of filial piety on the choice of care types for older people with disability in China. According to the characteristics of filial culture, the factors influencing the choice of care type for the older people in China are summarized as family endowment and support. The study concludes that gender, residence, living alone or not, family income, real estate, pension and community service have momentous effects on the choice of care type of older people with disability; informal care has a substitutive effect on formal care. The research was based on cross-sectional data of CLHLS 2018 and utilized binary logistic regression analysis to compare the factors influencing the choice of old disabled people between formal and informal care. The study implies that in the context of filial culture, the older people's choice of care types is affected by family endowment and community service supply for the older people in China. In the background of filial culture, the government should give informal care official support such as cash and services, so as to change its attribute of private domain of it and enhance the quality of long-term care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2022.954035

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 2006, Analysis of the living condition of the aged and their demands for home-based care in the Chenghua District of Chengdu, J Chengdu Univ Technol (Social Sciences), 21, 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0539.2006.04.006 · DOI
  2. De-Hui, 2017, SWOT analysis on internet + community family medical model-taking “care for life” project as an example, J Jiangxi Univ Trad Chin Med., 29, 84
  3. Norton, 2000, Long-term care
  4. Houser, 2010, Trends in Family Caregiving and Paid Home Care for Older People with Disabilities in the Community: Data from the National Long-Term Care Survey.
  5. Cheng, 2016, Life Quality of elderly and living arrangements: empirical study based on CLHLS data, Social Secur Stud., 2016, 31, 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4802.2016.01.004 · DOI
  6. Lau, 2003, Mencius

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Zang, Z.
Affiliations
Soochow University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zang, Zheng
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2022-09-06
Volume
10
Pages
954035-954035
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fpubh.2022.954035
PMC
PMC9485573
OpenAlex
W4294792999
Cited by
28
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Strong
  • Soochow University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
filial piety, older adults with disabilities, informal care, formal care, family endowment, community service, long-term care, living arrangements, gender differences, China
MeSH terms
Aged, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Health Status, Humans, Long-Term Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review