Cited by 8Sport Psychology and PerformanceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and Trauma

“You're made to feel like you're the crazy one”: an interpretive description of former college student-athletes’ views of emotional abuse

Open access
Adams, Kat V., Alexander, Katherine N., Dorsch, Travis E.·2024·Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

Abstract

Many normalized coaching behaviors are often abusive yet are seen by coaches and athletes as instrumental in achievement and competition. The current study was designed to extend past research and theory by subjectively exploring how and why former intercollegiate athletes identified their head coach as emotionally abusive. Twenty former intercollegiate student-athletes (Mage = 26.0 years) from nine sports participated in semi-structured interviews ranging from 65 to 189 min (M = 105.8, SD = 58). Interpretive description methodology was used with reflexive thematic analysis to generate a coherent conceptual description of the themes and shared experiences that characterized emotionally abusive coaching. The themes that associated with an athlete labeling a coach as emotionally abusive fall under two aspects of Stirling and Kerr's 2008 definition: non-contact coach behaviors and the resulting harmful outcomes experienced by the athletes. Non-contact behaviors were ones that diminished performance, neglected holistic development, and were inconsistent. The harmful effects were the negative emotional responses and dehumanization experienced by athletes. Finally, participants felt that a coach's desire for power and control over athletes explained the coach's behaviors generally. Based on these results, we put forth the conceptual claim that emotional abuse, and psychological violence more broadly, cannot be defined or identified based solely on the perpetrator's behaviors. The athlete's cognitions, perceptions, emotions, and behaviors are critical in determining whether emotional abuse occurred, and these interpretations are shaped by an athlete's existing relationship with the coach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fspor.2024.1428682

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Division I college sport has time constraints and conformity, where athletes are expected to forgo non-sport elements to maintain uniformity and dedication to the team.

    “This is particularly impactful given the presence of time constraints and conformity within Division I college sport where athletes are expected to forgo non-sport elements to maintain uniformity and dedication to the team (Adams et al.,2024).”

    From “It’s Not Just About Competition – It’s Ceremony”: Introducing the Embedded Indigeneity Framework for Understanding Identity, Mission, and Practice in TCU and NASNTI Athletics (2026) · cites this paper as Adams et al.,2024

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes a large time commitment in intercollegiate sport, and Results > Coach demonstration of power and control (page unavailable) records a participant being barred from going home or using social media during the season. These passages support time constraints and an example of restrictions on life outside sport, but they do not establish a general Division I expectation that athletes forgo non-sport activities for team uniformity and dedication; the study discusses athletes across competitive divisions. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [20]Powell SM Fasczewski KS Stevens N Tocci ND Jewell S Blumberg J Pressure, stress, and coping: exploring the professional demands of NCAA division I coaching. J Sport Behav. (2022) 45(1): 77– 94.
  2. [33]Braun V Clarke V. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide (1st Edition). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Melbourne: SAGE Publications Ltd (2021).
  3. [36]Wyte A. The Whyte Review June 2022. UK Sport (2022).
  4. [51]Epstein A. The NCAA and whistleblowers: 30-40 years of wrongdoing and college sport and possible solutions. South Law J. (2018) 28(1): 65– 84. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3133628

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, K. V., Alexander, K. N., & Dorsch, T. E.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Adams, Kat V.
Venue
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2024-10-28
Volume
6
Pages
1428682-1428682
ISSN
2624-9367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403806631
Cited by
7
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
emotional abuse, coaching, psychological violence, head coaches, athlete perceptions, coach-athlete relationship, power and control, dehumanization, athlete development, college athletics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review