Cited by 21Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactLivestock Farming and ManagementSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Public policies for the development of a sustainable cattle sector in Colombia, Argentina, and Costa Rica: A comparative analysis (2010–2020)

Open access
Lerma, Leonardo Moreno, Díaz Baca, Manuel Francisco, Burkart, Stefan·2022·Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Abstract

Projected food demand increases highlight the importance of Latin America as one of the big global future food suppliers, due to its agricultural potential, in particular regarding cattle farming. Despite the importance of the cattle sector for the region, its negative environmental impacts are numerous and the shift toward sustainability is perceived as slow and uncoordinated. This study aims at identifying successes and difficulties in the implementation of public policies for a sustainable cattle sector in Colombia, Argentina, and Costa Rica. Based on the review of scientific articles, government reports, and publications of international organizations, a qualitative comparative analysis was carried out, documenting the political developments between 2010 and 2020. Our findings suggest that public policies mainly focus on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the implementation of silvo-pastoral systems. Common successes exist among the three countries, e.g., a large number of public policies for promoting sustainable cattle farming or the inclusion of goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and implement silvo-pastoral systems, but they also coincide in difficulties, e.g., disconnection between policies and the lack of continuity of development programs. The efforts made with regional and national public policies, in addition to legislative advances, can be seen as initial steps in a long-term process toward sustainable cattle farming, and thus, recommendations are provided for increasing their success at different stages, from the identification of the problem to its evaluation, particularly in the face of financing difficulties, disconnection among policies and initiatives, and participation of citizens and livestock producers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fsufs.2022.722522

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Abbasi, T., Abbasi, T., and Abbasi, S. A. (2015). Reducing the global environmental impact of livestock production: the minilivestock option. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 1754-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015. 02.094 · DOI
  2. Armenteras, D. (2019). Luego de la paz con las FARC, los conflictos ambientales en Colombia cambiaron pero no desaparecieron. Entrevista por Antonio Paz. Bogotá: Mongabay. Available online at: https://bit.ly/3oaNcrj Asamblea Departamental de Casanare (2020). Plan Departamental de Extensión Agropecuaria 2020-2023. Yopal. Available online at: https://n9.cl/zvozd Banco Mundial (2019). Caso de negocios para la ganadería sostenible en Colombia. Bogotá: Banco Mundial. Available online at: https://bit.ly/3goLXTx Banco Mundial (2021). Costa Rica: Panorama General. San José: Banco Mundial. Available online at: https://bit.ly/3ncjuS6 Banco Mundial, CIAT, and CATIE (2014). Climate-Smart Agriculture Country Profiles: Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Banco Mundial. Available online at: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52993
  3. Goldfrank, B. (2006). Los procesos de presupuesto participativo en América Latina: éxito, fracaso y cambio. Universidad de Nuevo México. doi: 10.4067/S0718-090X2006000200001 · DOI
  4. Hernández, R., Fernández, C., and Baptista, M. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. Sexta edición. México, D.F., Mexico: McGraw Hill, 600. Available online at: https://n9.cl/65f IICA y Ministerio de Agricultura de la República Dominicana (2016). Establecimiento y uso de sistemas silvopastoriles en República Dominicana. Santo Domingo. Available online at: https://bit.ly/3vg4DJj INEC (2020). Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria 2019. San José. Available online at: https://bit.ly/3tk8ZO2 INTA (2014). Cuidar el ambiente tiene beneficios. Buenos Aires: Ganadería sustentable. Available online at: https://bit.ly/2QuPrJ3 INTA (2017). Programa Nacional Recursos Naturales, Gestión Ambiental y Ecorregiones. Buenos Aires: Plan de Programa Nacional. Available online at: https://bit.ly/3ged9nV
  5. Izquierdo, C., Vaca, I., and Mena, R. (2018). El nuevo sujeto social del consumo responsable. Quito 4, 97-123. doi: 10.32719/25506641.2018.4.5 · DOI
  6. Rao, I., Peters, M., Castro, A., Schultze-Kraft, R., White, D., Fisher, M., et al. (2015). LivestockPlus -The sustainable intensification of forage-based agricultural systems to improve livelihoods and ecosystem services in the tropics. Trop. Grasslands 3, 59-82. doi: 10.17138/TGFT(3)59-82 · DOI
  7. Taraborrelli, D. (2017). Políticas públicas rurales y modelos de desarrollo en Argentina. El Programa Cambio Rural entre 1993 y 2015. Estud. Soc. Estado 3, 164-188. doi: 10.35305/ese.v3i5.110 · DOI
  8. Tedeschi, L., Muir, J., Riley, D., and Fox, D. (2015). "Future implications for animal production: a perspective on sustainable livestock intensification, " in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Animal Science 2015. Belo Horizonte. Available online at: https://bit.ly/3iiccvK
  9. Varijakshapanicker, P., Mckune, S., Miller, L., Hendrickx, S., Balehegn, M., Dahl, G., et al. (2019). Sustainable livestock systems to improve human health, nutrition, and economic status. Anim. Front. 9, 39-50. doi: 10.1093/af/vfz041 · DOI
  10. Xie, H., Huang, Y., Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., and Wu, Q. (2019). Prospects for agricultural sustainable intensification: a review of research. Land 8, 157. doi: 10.3390/land811 0157 · DOI
  11. Yalmanov, N. (2021). "Public policy and policy-making, " in XXIII International Conference Culture, Personality, Society in the Conditions of Digitalization: Methodology and Experience of Empirical Research Conference. Volume 2020 (Yekaterinburg: KnE Social Sciences). doi: 10.18502/kss.v5i2.8400 · DOI

Authors
Lerma, L. M., Díaz Baca, M. F., & Burkart, S.
Corresponding author
Burkart, Stefan
Venue
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2022-03-11
Volume
6
ISSN
2571-581X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221104933
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
cattle sector, sustainable livestock production, public policy, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, silvopastoral systems, policy implementation, policy continuity, environmental impact of livestock, Colombia, Argentina, Costa Rica, Latin America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review