Cited by 2

The potential footprint of alternative meat adoption on corn and soybean producers

Blaustein-Rejto, Dan, Merener, Nicolas, Smith, Alex·2024·Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Abstract

Alternative meat (AltMeat), which includes plant-based and cultured meats, has the potential to improve the global food supply chain on numerous environmental and societal dimensions. Some of these gains, derived from lower animal meat consumption, could disrupt the supply chain of crops that are used as animal feed. This study evaluates the potential impact of animal meat displacement on major corn and soybean-producing regions, globally or in developed regions. We combine trading patterns and regional cost structures with potential crop demand reductions caused by animal meat displacement, to occur by 2032 on top of an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (OECD-FAO) baseline projection without AltMeat. We find that potential animal meat displacement in the US and the European Union (EU) would have a minor effect on crop markets. Worldwide displacement, however, would lead to significantly lower corn and soybean prices relative to the baseline OECD-FAO projection without AltMeat. We explore quantitatively the heterogeneous impact of such developments in crop-producing regions. Our findings shed light on a trade-off associated with the significant benefits of more sustainable meat production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1400515

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microalgae can simultaneously yield lipids, proteins, pigments, and bioactive compounds, enhancing economic feasibility.

    “Unlike soybeans, microalgae can simultaneously yield lipids, proteins, pigments, and bioactive compounds, significantly enhancing economic feasibility [1,13,14].”

    From Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionize Microalgae Biotechnology: Unlocking Sustainable Solutions for High-Value Compounds and Carbon Neutrality (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction and Materials and methods (§2.1–2.2; pages unavailable) discuss soybean use in animal feed and plant-based meat, including soybean meal, oil, and protein. Searches for microalgae, pigments, bioactive compounds, and coproducts found no passage addressing whether microalgae yields the listed products or whether doing so improves economic feasibility. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Blaustein-Rejto, D., Merener, N., & Smith, A.
Venue
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2024-10-22
Volume
8
ISSN
2571-581X
Cited by
2
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review