The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dataset of production characteristics and performance of small-scale carp aquaculture systems in Bangladesh
Open accessAbstract
Small-scale inland aquaculture has considerable potential to generate socioeconomic benefits in low-and middle-income countries. Hundreds of millions of people globally rely on inland aquaculture, contributing substantial economic and employment benefits to national and regional economies (FAO, 2022). Inland aquaculture also contributes substantially to rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation (Béné et al., 2016), nutrition and food security (Wang et al., 2024) and gender empowerment (Dam Lam et al., 2022), among others. Carps are the most widely produced inland aquaculture species (particularly in Asia), accounting for 53.8% of global inland aquaculture production in 2022 (FAO, 2024). Carp aquaculture (especially in Asia) has contributed substantially to global inland aquaculture expansion (Zhang et al., 2022), especially through carp polyculture systems (Naylor et al., 2022) Small-scale aquaculture systems generally rely on relatively small farms and simple (if not rudimentary) technologies, which often constrain the actual output, productivity and efficiency of the sector, and as an extension its potential to enhance food security and offer sustainable livelihoods (Wang et al., 2023). However, far from being homogenous, small-scale inland aquaculture systems (incl. carp) have radically different characteristics in low-and middle-income countries in terms of production models and commercialization practices (Short et al., 2021). Many efforts have sought to improve the performance of small-scale inland aquaculture systems in low-and middle-income countries. Improvement efforts mainly rely on the promotion of improved production practice/technologies, dissemination of knowledge about production/processing/marketing/nutrition, promotion of improved fish feed and species, or combinations of the above (Henriksson et al., 2021). However, many factors have constrained such efforts (Morgan et al., 2017), including our incomplete understanding of differentiation in the characteristics and performance of aquaculture systems (particularly small-scale systems), as well as of the differentiation in the needs, preferences and capacities of producers (Short et al., 2021). This is compounded by the general lack of comprehensive and consistent national/regional aquaculture statistics, the dynamic and fast-changing nature of the sector, and the lack of high-quality and fine-grained datasets compared to land-based agricultural systems. Collectively such information gaps contribute to the general failure to appreciate the considerable heterogeneity in the sector (both between and within countries), and design fitfor-purpose policies and interventions to improve the performance of small-scale aquaculture systems (Short et al., 2021). Bangladesh experiences many of these circumstances. Aquatic food contributes significantly to the growing demand for animal-based protein due to various interconnected environmental, cultural and socioeconomic reasons. Inland aquaculture caters currently for most of the national fish demand, with the country currently ranking as the 5 th largest aquaculture producer globally (FAO, 2022). The aquaculture sector has expanded substantially in the past decades, with an estimated 4.3 million households (20% of the rural population) operating at least one homestead pond that is usually small in size (0.08-0.10 ha on average). Carps are, by a wide margin, the most widely produced aquaculture species in Bangladesh, accounting for 55.4% of the total aquaculture output (DoF, 2022). Carp aquaculture is practiced across the entire country, and is overwhelmingly geared towards household selfconsumption and/or the national market (Henriksson et al., 2018). However, despite this clear importance of carp aquaculture systems in Bangladesh (and the broader region) we lack consistent and comprehensive datasets about their characteristics and performance across the country (and other parts of South and Southeast Asia). Although many public and private organizations have been actively trying to improve the performance of the sector through diverse interventions, these efforts are constrained by the lack of good understanding of producer differentiation among producers (and especially among small-scale producers that are one of the most dynamic segments in the sector) (Henriksson et al., 2018;Karim et al., 2016). Arguably, the good understanding of the characteristics, performance and needs of (small-scale) producers could help inform the design and targeting of aquaculture interventions in Bangladesh, and other similar contexts. This Data Report outlines such a dataset that contains the production characteristics and socioeconomic performance of small-scale carp aquaculture systems in Bangladesh. The dataset was collected through in-person structured surveys with 4,540 carp producers in 54 areas (upazillas) 1 spanning the entire country. In terms of production characteristics, the dataset contains variables related
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Q., Rossignoli, C. M., Dompreh, E. B., Su, J., Griffiths, D., Htoo, K. K., Nway, H. M., Akester, M., & Gasparatos, A. (2024) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103935 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Alkire, 2014, Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index, World Dev., 59, 251, 10.1016/j.worlddev.01.026 · DOI
- Béné, 2016, Contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to food security and poverty reduction: assessing the current evidence, World Dev., 79, 177, 10.1016/j.worlddev.11.007 · DOI
- Dam Lam, 2022, Sustainability impacts of ecosystem approaches to small-scale aquaculture in Bangladesh, Sustainability Sci., 17, 295, 10.1007/s11625-021-01076-w · DOI
- DoF, 2022, Yearbook of Fisheries Statistics of Bangladesh, 2020-21. Department of Fisheries
- Dompreh, 2025, Differentiated characteristics, sustainability performance and preferences among small-scale aquaculture producers: implications for sustainable intensification, Sustainability Sci, 10.1007/s11625-025-01703-w · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022.
- 2024, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024.
- Gasparatos, 2024, Survey of production characteristics and performance of small-scale carp aquaculture systems in Bangladesh, Res. Squ., 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4429734/v1 · DOI
- Gasparatos, 2018, Survey of local impacts of biofuel crop production and adoption of ethanol stoves in Southern Africa, Sci. Data, 5, 180186, 10.1038/sdata.2018.186 · DOI
- Henriksson, 2018, Measuring the potential for sustainable intensification of aquaculture in Bangladesh using life cycle assessment, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 115, 2958, 10.1073/pnas.1716530115 · DOI
- Henriksson, 2021, Interventions for improving the productivity and environmental performance of global aquaculture for future food security. One, Earth, 4, 1220, 10.1016/j.oneear.08.009 · DOI
- Hossain, 2022, Economic assessment of freshwater carp polyculture in Bangladesh: profit sensitivity, economies of scale and liquidity, Aquaculture, 548, 737552, 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737552 · DOI
- Jahan, 2015, Aquaculture Technologies in Bangladesh: An Assessment of Technical and Economic Performance and Producer Behavior.
- Karim, 2016, Investing in carp seed quality improvements in homestead aquaculture: lessons from Bangladesh, Aquaculture, 453, 19, 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.11.027 · DOI
- Morgan, 2017, Socio-cultural dynamics shaping the potential of aquaculture to deliver development outcomes, Rev. Aquacult., 9, 317, 10.1111/raq.12137 · DOI
- Naylor, 2021, A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture, Nature, 591, 551, 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6 · DOI
- Phung, 2015, Non-sampling error and data quality: what can we learn from surveys to collect data for vulnerability measurements?, World Dev., 71, 25, 10.1016/j.worlddev.11.008 · DOI
- Rossignoli, Multi-stakeholder perception analysis of the status, characteristics, and factors affecting small-scale carp aquaculture systems in Bangladesh, Front. Sustainable Food Syst., 7, 1121434, 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1121434 · DOI
- Short, 2021, Harnessing the diversity of small-scale actors is key to the future of aquatic food systems, Nat. Food, 2, 733, 10.1038/s43016-021-00363-0 · DOI
- Waha, 2016, An agricultural survey for more than 9,500 African households, Sci. Data, 3, 160020, 10.1038/sdata.2016.20 · DOI
- Wang, 2023, Sustainable intensification of small-scale aquaculture production in Myanmar through diversification and better management practices, Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 15002, 10.1088/1748-9326/acab16 · DOI
- 2008, Food Consumption Analysis: Calculation and Use of the Food Consumption Score in Food Security Analysis [Technical Guidance Sheet].
- Zhang, 2022, Aquaculture will continue to depend more on land than sea., Nature, 603, E2, 10.1038/s41586-021-04331-3 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Gasparatos, A., Dompreh, E. B., Wang, Q., Dam Lam, R., Barman, B. K., Su, J., & Rossignoli, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo (JP)
- WorldFish (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Gasparatos, Alexandros
- Venue
- Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-12-17
- Volume
- 9
- ISSN
- 2571-581X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4417416750
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Fisheries and Aquaculture Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Systems and Practices
- Keywords
- inland aquaculture, aquaculture performance, producer heterogeneity, fish marketing, fish nutrition, aquaculture extension, Bangladesh, low- and middle-income countries, aquaculture statistics, rural livelihoods, food security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review