Cited by 123Human-Animal Interaction StudiesCOVID-19 and Mental HealthAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Spark a Public Interest in Pet Adoption?

Open access
Ho, Jeffery, Hussain, Sabir, Sparagano, Olivier·2021·Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Abstract

This study aimed to determine if there has been an increase of global interest on pet adoption immediately after the WHO declaration of the pandemic and if the effect has been sustainable in 8 months on. We conducted a Google Trends search using keywords related to pet adoption. Relative search volume (RSV) was scored between 0 and 100 for the lowest and the highest, respectively. Top countries contributing to the dataset included Australia, the United States, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Singapore, the Philippines, and Malaysia. From 2015 through 2020, the worldwide RSV for the categories of pet, dog and cat adoption peaked between April and May 2020, the early epidemic phase of the pandemic. These were significantly higher than the 5-year worldwide average RSV for all three categories (P = 0.001). Comparing to the same period in 2019, the RSV ratio (2020/2019) for both dog and cat adoption increased by up to 250%. Nonetheless, the RSV for dog adoption has been decreasing since July 2020 and returned to the 5-year average by December 2020. In contrast, the interest in cat adoption remained sustainably high, possibly reflecting the feline acclimation to indoor living. In conclusion, the global interest in pet adoptions surged in the early phase of the pandemic but not sustainable. With the launch of COVID-19 vaccines, there is a concern for separation anxiety and possible abandonment of these newly adopted pets when the owners would leave their homes for work in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fvets.2021.647308

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These decisions may have been related to the increased number of people working from home, home schooling, and restrictions on leaving the home for non-essential reasons.

    “These decisions may have been related to the increased number of people working from home, home schooling, and restrictions on leaving the home for non-essential reasons (32, 43–45).”

    From Companion animal adoption and relinquishment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Peri-pandemic pets at greatest risk of relinquishment (2022) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Introduction describes working-from-home policies and more time spent at home alongside reports of increased pet adoption; the Discussion also mentions lockdown confinement. The paper does not discuss home schooling as a possible reason for adoption decisions, so it supports only part of the proposed explanation. The indexed copy provides section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Problems may be exacerbated by inexperience with pet ownership in those that acquired a pet post-pandemic.

    “What's more, problems may be exacerbated by inexperience with pet ownership in those that acquired a pet post-pandemic (43).”

    From Companion animal adoption and relinquishment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Peri-pandemic pets at greatest risk of relinquishment (2022) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Discussion says separation-anxiety-related behavioral problems may overwhelm inexperienced first-time owners who adopted pets during the pandemic. It does not address people who acquired pets post-pandemic, and it describes inexperience as making the problems harder for owners to manage rather than worsening the problems themselves. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence suggests that the chance of companion animals spreading COVID-19 is low.

    “However, evidence suggests that the chance of companion animals spreading COVID-19 is low (43).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1]Wong PWC Yu RWM Ngai JTK. Companion animal ownership and human well-being in a metropolis—the case of Hong Kong. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16: 1729. 10.3390/ijerph16101729 31100852 PMC6571622 · DOI
  2. [2]Dhama K Patel SK Sharun K Pathak M Tiwari R Yatoo MI. SARS-CoV-2 jumping the species barrier: zoonotic lessons from SARS, MERS and recent advances to combat this pandemic virus. Travel Med Infect Dis. (2020) 37: 101830. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101830 32755673 PMC7396141 · DOI
  3. [3]Dhama K Khan S Tiwari R Sircar S Bhat S Malik YS. Coronavirus disease 2019-COVID-19. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2020) 33: e00028– e00020. 10.1128/CMR.00028-20 32580969 PMC7405836 · DOI
  4. [9]Vincent A Mamzer H Ng Z Farkas KJ. People and their pets in the times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Society Register. (2020) 4: 111– 28. 10.14746/sr.2020.4.3.0632612749 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [10]Parry NMA. COVID-19 and pets: when pandemic meets panic. Forensic Sci Int. (2020) 2: 100090. PMC7151387 38620282
  6. [11]Huang Q Zhan X Zeng XT. COVID-19 pandemic: stop panic abandonment of household pets. J Travel Med. (2020) 27: taaa046. 10.1093/jtm/taaa046 32268360 PMC7184468 · DOI
  7. [13]Reese LA Vertalka JJ Richard C. Animal cruelty and neighborhood conditions. Animals. (2020) 10: 2095. 10.3390/ani10112095 PMC7696964 33187259 · DOI
  8. [16]Bhambhvani HP Tijerina JD Parham MJ Grenberg DR Eisenberg ML. Public interest in elective urological procedures in the COVID-19 pandemic: a Google Trends analysis. Urology Practice. (2020) 7: 496– 501. 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000179 37287180 · DOI
  9. [17]Heerfordt C Heerfordt IM. Has there been an increased interest in smoking cessation during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic? A Google Trends study. Public Health. (2020) 183: 6– 7. 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.012 32388011 PMC7167577 · DOI
  10. [18]Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillane: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the internet. J Med Internet Res. (2009) 11: e11. 10.2196/jmir.1157 19329408 PMC2762766 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [19]Cervellin G Comelli I Lippi G. Is Google Trends a reliable tool for digital epidemiology? Insights from different clinical settings. J Epidemiol Global Health, (2017) 185– 9. 10.1016/j.jegh.2017.06.001 28756828 PMC7320449 · DOI
  12. [20]Mavragani A Ochoa G. Google trends in infodemiology and infoveillance: methodology framework. JMIR Public Health Surveill. (2019) 5: e13439. 10.2196/13439 31144671 PMC6660120 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [21]Carneiro HA Mylonakis E. Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clin Infect Dis. (2009) 49: 1557– 64. 10.1086/630200 19845471 · DOI
  14. [24]Csiszar A Jakab F Valencak TG Lanszki Z Toth GE Kemenesi G. Companion animals likely do no spread COVID-19 but may get infected themselves. Geroscience. (2020) 45: 1229– 36. 10.1007/s11357-020-00248-3 32766998 PMC7410515 · DOI
  15. [26]Bowen J Garcia E Darder P Arguelles J Fatjo J. The effects of the Spanish COVID-19 lockdown on people, their pets, and the human-animal bond. J Vet Behav. (2020) 40: 75– 91. 10.1016/j.jveb.2020.05.013 32837452 PMC7292953 · DOI
  16. [27]Latif AA Mukaratirwa S. Zoonotic origins and animal hosts of coronaviruses causing human disease pandemics: a review. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. (2020) 87: e1– 9. 10.4102/ojvr.v87i1.1895 33354975 PMC7756848 · DOI
  17. [28]Tiwari R Dhama K Sharun K Iqbal Yatoo M Malik YS Singh R. COVID-19: animals, veterinary and zoonotic linkes. Vet Q. (2020) 40: 169– 82. 10.1080/01652176.2020.1766725 32393111 PMC7755411 · DOI
  18. [29]Applebaum JW Adams BL Eliasson MN Zsembik BA McDonald SE. How pets factor into healthcare decisions for COVID-19: a one-health perspective. One Health. (2020) 11: 100176. 10.016/j.onehlt.2020.100176 33062838 PMC7543786
  19. [30]Bonilla-Aldana DK Dhama K Rodriguez-Morales AJ. Revisiting the One Health approach in the context of COVID-19: a look into the ecology of this emerging disease. Adv Anim Vet Sci. (2020) 8: 234– 7. 10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.3.234.237 · DOI
  20. [31]El Zowalaty ME Jarhult JD. A previously unknown SARS-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) of pandemic potential infecting humans—call for a one health approach. One Health. (2020) 24: 100124. 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100124 32195311 PMC7075990 · DOI
  21. [32]Hafez HM Attia YA. Challenges to the poultry industry: current perspectives and strategic future after the COVID-19 outbreak. Front Vet Sci. (2020) 7: 516. 10.3389/fvets.2020.00516 33005639 PMC7479178 · DOI
  22. [33]Haider N Rothman-Ostrow P Osman AY Arruda LB Macfarlane-Berry L Elton L. COVID-19 zoonosis or emerging infectious disease? Front Public Health. (2020) 8: 596944. 10.3389/fpubh.2020.596944 33324602 PMC7725765 · DOI
  23. [34]Hussain S Hussain A Ho J Sparagano OAE Zia UU. Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 on animal welfare and dairy husbandry in Central Punjab, Pakistan. Front Vet Sci. (2020) 7: 589971. 10.3389/fvets.2020.589971 33195626 PMC7644897 · DOI
  24. [36]Hoy-Gerlach J Rauktis M Newhill C. Non-human animal companionship: a crucial support for people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Society Register. (2020) 4: 109– 20. 10.14746/sr.2020.4.2.08 · DOI
  25. [37]Chadwin R. Evacuation of pets during disasters: a public health intervention to increase resilience. Am J Public Health. (2017) 107: 1413– 7. 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303877 28727532 PMC5551593 · DOI
  26. [39]Flannigan G Dodman NG. Risk factors and behaviors associated with separation anxiety in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2001) 219: 360– 466. 10.2460/javma.2001.219.460 11518171 · DOI
  27. [40]Irian M. COVID-19, your pet and other animals: are you at risk? Medic Rev. (2020) 22: 81– 2. 10.37757/MR2020.V22 33295324 · DOI
  28. [41]Sharun K Tiwari R Patel SK Karithik K Iqbal Yatoo M Malik YS. Coronavirus disease. (2020). (COVID-19) in domestic animals and wildlife: advances and prospects in the development of animal models for vaccine and therapeutic research. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2019) 11: 1– 12. 10.1080/21645515.2020.1807802 PMC8641595 32915100 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, J., Hussain, S., & Sparagano, O.
Affiliations
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Sparagano, Olivier
Venue
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2021-05-07
Volume
8
Pages
647308-647308
ISSN
2297-1769 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3161822583
Cited by
123
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 10
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Veterinary Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
City University of Hong Kong (9380108)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, pet adoption, dog adoption, cat adoption, public interest, Google Trends, relative search volume, pet abandonment, separation anxiety, COVID-19 vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review