Cited by 84Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesCOVID-19 and Mental Health

“More Attention than Usual”: A Thematic Analysis of Dog Ownership Experiences in the UK during the First COVID-19 Lockdown

Open access
Holland, Katrina E., Owczarczak-Garstecka, Sara C., Anderson, Katharine L., Casey, Rachel A., Christley, Robert M., Harris, Lauren, McMillan, Kirsten M., Mead, Rebecca +3 more·2021·Animals

Abstract

On 23 March 2020, the UK Government imposed a nationwide lockdown as part of efforts to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. This study aimed to explore how the experience of dog ownership in the UK was impacted during this lockdown. Data for this research came from open-ended survey questions and an electronic diary completed by members of the general public and participants involved in “Generation Pup”, an ongoing longitudinal cohort study of dogs. A total of 10,510 free-text entries were analysed. Three major themes emerged: spending time at home with dog(s), walking practices, and behaviour and training. Owners valued having more time than usual with their dog(s) but also recognised that spending extra time with their dog(s) may negatively impact on the dog’s future ability to cope when left alone. However, very few owners provided alone time for their dog(s) during the lockdown. The opportunity to walk their dog(s) as part of their permitted daily exercise was regarded positively, but walks under the lockdown guidelines were not always felt to be adequate with respect to providing sufficient exercise and opportunities for interaction with other dogs. Owners reported observing new undesirable behaviours in their dog(s) during the lockdown, including barking and dogs being “clingy” or vocalising when briefly left alone. Based on these findings, we suggest intervention strategies to best support dog welfare that include helping dog owners to teach dogs to cope with being alone, even if owners do not need to leave their dogs alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani11010240

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frontline workers face increased workloads and time pressures, leaving less time available to care for pets.

    “Similarly, frontline workers face increased workloads and time pressures, leaving less time available to care for pets (5, 6).”

    From Companion animal adoption and relinquishment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Peri-pandemic pets at greatest risk of relinquishment (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results (section 3.4, page unavailable) describe a frontline worker who could no longer come home at lunch, leaving their dog alone for about eight hours. This supports reduced availability for pet care in one case, but the paper does not say that increased workloads or time pressures caused it, or establish that this applies to frontline workers generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [49]Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers 3rd ed. SAGE Publications, Ltd. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holland, K. E., Owczarczak-Garstecka, S. C., Anderson, K. L., Casey, R. A., Christley, R. M., Harris, L., McMillan, K. M., Mead, R., Murray, J. K., Samet, L., & Upjohn, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Dogs Trust (GB)
  • Dogs Trust, London EC1V 7RQ, UK
Corresponding author
Holland, Katrina E.
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-01-19
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
240
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125848410
Cited by
84
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Dogs Trust (CWG012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
dog ownership, COVID-19 lockdown, dog welfare, human-dog interaction, dog walking, dog behavior, dog training, physical activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review