Cited by 17Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Adapting artificial intelligence into the evolution of pharmaceutical sciences and publishing: Technological darwinism

Open access
Davies, Neal M.·2023·Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

This article explores the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in pharmaceutical research and development, particularly in the use of language models such as Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT). The evolution of technology and scientific publishing is discussed, highlighting the need for adaptability and change. The advancements in pharmaceutical science over the years are outlined, including the contribution of techniques such as combinatorial chemistry and pharmacogenomics. The potential benefits of AI models in pharmaceutical research and development are explored, such as assisting in literature reviews, data analysis, modeling, and interpretation, as well as aiding in the drug discovery and development processes. However, the limitations and potential biases of these tools are also recognized, and the importance of using them appropriately and in conjunction with human expertise and critical thinking is emphasized. The article also discusses the need for pharmaceutical researchers and practitioners to carefully evaluate the output of AI models, checking for accuracy and potential biases, and to incorporate this information into their published work thoughtfully. Guidelines and policies regarding the use of AI models in scientific publications are suggested, highlighting the importance of rigor and transparency in research. Authors are encouraged to stay up-to-date with current research and guidelines and collaborate closely with journal editors and reviewers to ensure appropriate and transparent use of AI models. The article concludes with a reflection on the ongoing evolution of technology and the need for researchers to stay updated with the latest advancements and best practices to succeed. The importance of adaptability and change is highlighted, and Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and natural selection is used to emphasize the relevance of this concept in the context of AI and pharmaceutical research. Overall, the article presents a thought-provoking and informative discussion of the potential benefits and limitations of AI language models in pharmaceutical research and development and the need for appropriate and effective use of these tools.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/jpps.2023.11349

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI models may not be able to adapt quickly enough to dynamic environments, leading to sub-optimal performance and potential errors.

    “AI models may not be able to adapt quickly enough to these dynamic environments, leading to sub-optimal performance and potential errors [98].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, N. M.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Davies, Neal M.
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences
Published
2023-03-22
Volume
26
Pages
11349-11349
ISSN
1482-1826 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4353092806
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
scholarly publishing, algorithmic bias, drug discovery, literature review automation, combinatorial chemistry, pharmacogenomics, research transparency, technological change
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Drug Industry, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Publishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review