Cited by 72Technical Engine Diagnostics and MonitoringMechanical Failure Analysis and SimulationAerospace Engineering and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Taxonomy of Gas Turbine Blade Defects

Open access
Aust, Jonas, Pons, Dirk·2019·Aerospace

Abstract

Context—The maintenance of aero engines is intricate, time-consuming, costly and has significant functional and safety implications. Engine blades and vanes are the most rejected parts during engine maintenance. Consequently, there is an ongoing need for more effective and efficient inspection processes. Purpose—This paper defines engine blade defects, assigns root-causes, shows causal links and cascade effects and provides a taxonomy system. Approach—Defect types were identified from the literature and maintenance manuals, categorisations were devised and an ontology was created. Results—Defect was categorised into Surface Damage, Wear, Material Separation and Material Deformation. A second categorisation identified potential causes of Impact, Environmental causes, Operational causes, Poor maintenance, Poor manufacturing and Fatigue. These two categorisations were integrated with an ontology. Originality—The work provides a single comprehensive illustrated list of engine blade defects, and a standardised defect terminology, which currently does not exist in the aviation industry. It proposes a taxonomy for both engine blade defects and root-causes, and shows that these may be related using an ontology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/aerospace6050058

Cites

38 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (2016). Commercial Aircraft Propulsion and Energy Systems Research: Reducing Global Carbon Emissions, The National Academies Press.
  2. Dewangan, 2015, Gas turbine blades—A critical review of failure at first and second stages, Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res., 4, 216
  3. Rao, 2014, Failure mechanisms in turbine blades of a gas turbine Engine—An overview, Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev., 10, 48
  4. Drury, C.G., and Gramopadhye, A.K. (1990, January 12–13). Training for visual inspection. Proceedings of the 3rd FAA Meeting on Human Factors in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection: Training Issues, Atlantic City, NJ, USA.
  5. Waite, S. (2006, January 19–21). Defect Types and Inspection. Proceedings of the MIL17 Maintenance Workshop, Chicago, IL, USA.
  6. Chalimoniuk, 2015, Types of Damages to Turbines of Aircraft Turbine Engines; Diagnosing Capabilities, J. Pol. C., 4, 1
  7. Ilcewicz, L. (2006, January 19). Composite damage tolerance and maintenance safety issues. Proceedings of the FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop, Rosemont, IL, USA.
  8. Khan, M.A.U. (1998, January 26–29). Non-destructive Testing Applications in Commercial Aircraft Maintenance. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Non-destructive Testing, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  9. Iannone, L., and Rector, A. (2008). Calculations in OWL, University of Manchester. Available online: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-432/owled2008eu_submission_17.pdf.
  10. Juengert, 2008, Damage Detection in Wind Turbine Blades using two Different Acoustic Techniques, J. Nondestruct. Test., 34, 11
  11. Hu, Y., and Kasabov, N. (2007). Ontology-Based Framework for Personalized Diagnosis and Prognosis of Cancer Based on Gene Expression Data, Springer.
  12. Taha, 2015, An Ontology-Based Expert System for General Practitioners to Diagnose Cardiovascular Diseases, Adv. Comput. Sci. Technol., 8, 53
  13. Thirugnanam, 2013, An Ontology Based System for Predicting Disease using SWRL Rules, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Bus. Inform., 7, 1
  14. Groover, M.P. (2012). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, Wiley. [5th ed.].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 72

Metadata

Authors
Aust, J., & Pons, D.
Affiliations
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Corresponding author
Pons, Dirk
Venue
Aerospace
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-05-21
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
58
ISSN
2226-4310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945187849
Cited by
68
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aerospace (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Christchurch Engine Centre (2019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Technical Engine Diagnostics and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Applications
Keywords
gas turbine blades, defect classification, root cause analysis, surface damage, wear, material separation, material deformation, fatigue (material), impact damage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review