Cited by 19

Developing an NIRS prediction model for oil, protein, amino acids and fatty acids in amaranth and buckwheat

Shruti, Shukla, Alka, Rahman, Saman Saim, Suneja, Poonam, Yadav, Rashmi, Hussain, Zakir, Singh, Rakesh, Yadav, Shiv Kumar +3 more·2023·Agriculture

Abstract

Amaranth and buckwheat are two pseudo-cereals preferred for their high nutritional value, are gluten free and carry religious importance as fasting food. Germplasm resources are the reservoir of diversity for different traits, including nutritional characteristics. These resources must be evaluated to utilize their potential in crop improvement programs. However, conventional methods are labor-, cost- and time-intensive and prone to handling errors when applied to large samples. NIRS-based machine learning to predict different nutritional traits is applied in different food crops for multiple traits. NIRS prediction models are developed in this study using the mPLS regression technique for oil, protein, fatty acids and essential amino acid estimation in amaranth and buckwheat. Good RSQ external (power of determination) values were obtained for the above traits ranging from 0.72 to 0.929. Ratio performance deviation (RPD) value for most of the traits ranged between 2 and 3, except for valine (1.88) and methionine (3.55), indicating good prediction capabilities in the developed model. These prediction models were utilized in screening the germplasm of amaranth and buckwheat; the results obtained were in good agreement and confirmed the applicability of developed models. It will enable the identification of a trait-specific germplasm as a potential gene source and aid in crop improvement programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agriculture13020469

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparable descriptors are needed before machine learning can identify robust predictors.

    “Comparable descriptors are needed before machine learning can identify robust predictors”

    From Structure-function design of amaranth, buckwheat and quinoa proteins as hydrocolloids for emulsion and gel structuring (2027) · cites this paper as Shruti et al. (2023)

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says NIR spectra are preprocessed to reduce noise and enhance feature extraction before prediction models are developed. That supports a narrower point about preparing spectral data, but the paper does not say that comparable descriptors are required before machine learning can identify robust predictors. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Pirzadah, T.B.; Malik, B. Pseudocereals as super foods of 21st century: Recent technological interventions. J. Agric. Food Res. 2020, 2, 100052. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Mota, C.; Nascimento, A.C.; Santos, M.; Delgado, I.; Coelho, I.; Rego, A.; Matos, S.A.; Torres, D.; Castanheira, I. The effect of cooking methods on the mineral content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), amaranth (Amaranthus sp.) and buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum). J. Food Compos. Anal. 2016, 49, 57-64. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Martínez-Villaluenga, C.; Peñas, E.; Hernández-Ledesma, B. Pseudocereal grains: Nutritional value, health benefits and current applications for the development of gluten-free foods. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 137, 111178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  4. Cornicelli, M.; Saba, M.; Machello, N.; Silano, M.; Neuhold, S. Nutritional composition of gluten-free food versus regular food sold in the Italian market. Digest. Liver Dis. 2018, 50, 1305-1308. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Zhang, Z.L.; Zhou, M.L.; Tang, Y.; Li, F.L.; Tang, Y.X.; Shao, J.R.; Wu, Y.M. Bioactive compounds in functional buckwheat food. Food Res. Int. 2012, 49, 389-395. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Chaudhary, M.A.; Imran, I.; Bashir, S.; Mehmood, M.H.; Rehman, N.U.; Gilani, A.H. Evaluation of gut modulatory and bronchodilator activities of Amaranthus spinosus Linn. BMC Comp. Alt. Med. 2012, 12, 1-11. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Sarker, U.; Rabbani, M.; Oba, S.; Eldehna, W.M.; Al-Rashood, S.T.; Mostafa, N.M.; Eldahshan, O.A. Phytonutrients, colorant pigments, phytochemicals, and antioxidant potential of orphan leafy Amaranthus species. Molecules 2022, 27, 2899. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Jahan, S.; Nesa, M.; Hossain, M.E.; Rajbangshi, J.C.; Hossain, M.S. In vivo and in silico evaluation of analgesic and hypoglycemic activities of Amaranthus blitum L. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 150, 565-575. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Martinez-Lopez, A.; Rivero-Pino, F.; Villanueva, A.; Toscano, R.; Grao-Cruces, E.; Marquez-Paradas, E.; Martin, E.M.; Montserrat- de la Paz, M.; Millan-Linares, M.C. Kiwicha (Amaranthus caudatus L.) protein hydrolysates reduce intestinal inflammation by modulating the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 11604-11614. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Fernández-Novales, J.; Garde-Cerdán, T.; Tardáguila, J.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Pérez-Álvarez, E.P.; Diago, M.P. Assessment of amino acids and total soluble solids in intact grape berries using contactless Vis and NIR spectroscopy during ripening. Talanta 2019, 199, 244-253. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Tomar, M.; Bhardwaj, R.; Kumar, M.; Singh, S.P.; Krishnan, V.; Kansal, R.; Verma, R.; Yadav, V.K.; Ahlawat, S.P.; Rana, J.C.; et al. Development of NIR spectroscopy based prediction models for nutritional profiling of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.)) R. Br: A chemometrics approach. LWT 2021, 149, 111813. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Priyadarshi, M.B.; Sharma, A.; Chaturvedi, K.K.; Bhardwaj, R.; Singh, M. Development and Comparison of Regression Models for Determination of Starch in Chickpea Using NIR Spectroscopy. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 2022, 15, 683-691. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. John, R.; Bhardwaj, R.; Jeyaseelan, C.; Bollinedi, H.; Singh, N.; Harish, G.D. Germplasm variability-assisted near infrared reflectance spectroscopy chemometrics to develop multi-trait robust prediction models in rice. Front. Nutr. 2022, 2022, 946255. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  14. Bartwal, A.; John, R.; Padhi, S.R.; Suneja, P.; Bhardwaj, R.; Wankhede, D.P.; Archak, S. NIR spectra processing for developing efficient protein prediction Model in mungbean. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2023, 116, 105087. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Neff, W.E.; Adlof, R.O.; List, G.R.; El-Agaimy, M. Analyses of vegetable oil triacylglycerols by silver ion high performance liquid chromatography with flame ionization detection. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1994, 17, 3951-3968. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Mandal, S.; Yadav, S.; Singh, R.; Begum, G.; Singh, M. Sources of high Erucic acid in Cruciferae. Seed Tech. News 2002, 32, 85-86.
  17. Sáez-Plaza, P.; Navas, M.J.; Wybraniec, S.; Michałowski, T.; Asuero, A.G. An overview of the Kjeldahl method of nitrogen determination. Part II. Sample preparation, working scale, instrumental finish, and quality control. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2013, 43, 224-272. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Davis, A.M.C., Williams, P.C., Eds.; NIR Publications: Chichester, UK, 1996; pp. 185-188.
  19. Shenk, J.S.; Westerhaus, M.O. Near infrared reflectance analysis with single and multiproduct calibrations. Crop Sci. 1993, 33, 582-584. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Chadalavada, K.; Anbazhagan, K.; Ndour, A.; Choudhary, S.; Palmer, W.; Flynn, J.R.; Mallayee, S.; Pothu, S.; Prasad, K.V.S.; Varijakshapanikar, P.; et al. NIR Instruments and Prediction Methods for Rapid Access to Grain Protein Content in Multiple Cereals. Sensors 2022, 22, 3710. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Guo, Y.Z.; Chen, Q.F.; Yang, L.Y.; Huang, Y.H. Analyses of the seed protein contents on the cultivated and wild buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum resources. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2007, 54, 1465-1472. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Ayorinde, F.O.; Ologunde, M.O.; Nana, E.Y.; Bernard, B.N.; Afolabi, O.A.; Oke, O.L.; Shepard, R.L. Determination of Fatty Acid Composition of Amaranthus Species. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1989, 66, 1812-1814. Available online: https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/BF02660754 (accessed on 9 December 2022). [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Tang, Y.; Tsao, R. Phytochemicals in quinoa and amaranth grains and their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and potential health beneficial effects: A review. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1600767. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  24. Velarde-Salcedo, A.J.; Bojorquez-Velázquez, E.; Johnson, J.; and Wallace, T. Whole Grains and their Bioactives: Composition and Health. In Pseudo Cereal Grains, Whole Food Nutrition Amaranth; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 211-250.
  25. Gorinstein, S.; Pawelzik, E.; Delgado-Licon, E.; Haruenkit, R.; Weisz, M.; Trakhtenberg, S. Characterisation of pseudo-cereal and cereal proteins by protein and amino acid analyses. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2002, 82, 886-891. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Coelho, L.M.; Silva, P.M.; Martins, J.T.; Pinheiro, A.C.; and Vicente, A.A. Emerging opportunities in exploring the nutri- tional/functional value of amaranth. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 5499-5512. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  27. Jin, J.; Ohanenye, I.C.; Udenigwe, C.C. Buckwheat proteins: Functionality, safety, bioactivity, and prospects as alternative plant-based proteins in the food industry. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2022, 62, 1752-1764. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  28. Wijngaard, H.; Arendt, E.K. Buckwheat. Cereal Chem. 2006, 83, 391-401. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Zhou, X.L.; Wen, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.L. Advance on the benefits of bioactive peptides from buckwheat. Phytochem. Rev. 2015, 14, 381-388. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Saeed, F.; Afzaal, M.; Ikram, A.; Imran, A.; Hussain, S.; Mohamed, A.A.; Mohamed, A.S.; Hussain, M. Exploring the amino acid composition and vitamin-B profile of buckwheat varieties. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15743. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Rastogi, A.; Shukla, S. Amaranth: A new millennium crop of nutraceutical values. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 109-125. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Padhi, S.R.; John, R.; Bartwal, A.; Tripathi, K.; Gupta, K.; Wankhede, D.P.; Misra, G.P.; Kumar, S.; Rana, J.C.; Bhardwaj, R. Development and optimization of NIRS prediction models for simultaneous multi-trait assessment in diverse cowpea germplasm. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1001551. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Wu, Y.; Peng, S.; Xie, Q.; Han, Q.; Zhang, G.; Sun, H. An improved weighted multiplicative scatter correction algorithm with the use of variable selection: Application to near-infrared spectra. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2019, 185, 114-121. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Au, J.; Youngentob, K.N.; Foley, W.J.; Moore, B.D.; Fearn, T. Sample selection, calibration and validation of models developed from a large dataset of near infrared spectra of tree leaves. J. Near Infrared. Spectrosc. 2020, 28, 186-203. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Berganza, B.E.; Moran, A.W.; Rodríguez, G.M.; Coto, N.M.; Santamaría, M.; Bressani, R. Effect of variety and location on the total fat, fatty acids and squalene content of amaranth. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2003, 58, 1-6. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Mlakar, S.G.; Turinek, M.; Jakop, M.; Bavec, M.; Bavec, F. Grain amaranth as an alternative and perspective crop in temperate climate. J. Geogr. 2010, 5, 135-145.
  37. Shukla, A.; Srivastava, N.; Suneja, P.; Yadav, S.K.; Hussain, Z.; Rana, J.C.; Yadav, S. Genetic diversity analysis in Buckwheat germplasm for nutritional traits. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 56, 827-837.
  38. Wright, K.H.; Pike, O.A.; Fairbanks, D.J.; Huber, C.S. Composition of Atriplex hortensis, sweet and bitter Chenopodium quinoa seeds. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1383-1385. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Gimplinger, D.M.; Dobos, G.; Schonlechner, R.; Kaul, H. Yield and quality of grain amaranth (Amaranthus sp.) in Eastern Austria. Plant Soil Environ. 2007, 53, 105. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. Schoenlechner, R.; Siebenhandl, S.; Berghofer, E. Pseudocereals; Gluten-Free Cereal Products and Beverages; Academic Press: Cam- bridge, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 149-190.
  41. Shukla, A.; Srivastava, N.; Suneja, P.; Yadav, S.K.; Hussain, Z.; Rana, J.C.; Yadav, S. Untapped amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) genetic diversity with potential for nutritional enhancement. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2018, 65, 243-253. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. Kraujalis, P.; Venskutonis, P.R.; Kraujalien ė, V.; Pukalskas, A. Antioxidant properties and preliminary evaluation of phytochemical composition of different anatomical parts of amaranth. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2013, 68, 322-328. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Martirosyan, D.M.; Miroshnichenko, L.A.; Kulakova, S.N.; Pogojeva, A.V.; Zoloedov, V.I. Amaranth oil application for coronary heart disease and hypertension. Lipids Health Dis. 2007, 6, 1-12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  44. Mazza, G. Lipid content and fatty acid composition of buckwheat seed. Cereal Chem. 1988, 65, 122-126.
  45. Pomeranz, Y.; Lorenz, K. Buckwheat: Structure, composition, and utilization. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 1983, 19, 213-258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  46. Tang, C.H. Functional properties and in vitro digestibility of buckwheat protein products: Influence of processing. J. Food Eng. 2007, 82, 568-576. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Ryan, E.; Galvin, K.; O'Connor, T.P.; Maguire, A.R.; O'Brien, N.M. Phytosterol, squalene, tocopherol content and fatty acid profile of selected seeds, grains, and legumes. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2007, 62, 85-91. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Sato, T.; Morishita, T.; Hara, T.; Suda, I.; Tetsuka, T. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopic analysis of moisture, fat, protein, and physiological activity in buckwheat flour for breeding selection. Plant Prod. Sci. 2001, 4, 270-277. [CrossRef] · DOI
  49. Sokolova, D.; Shelenga, T.; Zvereva, O.; Solovieva, A. Comparative characteristics of the amino acid composition in amaranth accessions from the VIR Collection. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2021, 45, 68-78.
  50. Akin-Idowu, P.E.; Odunola, O.A.; Gbadegesin, M.A.; Oke, A.; Orkpeh, U. Assessment of the protein quality of twenty nine grain amaranth (Amaranthus spp. L.) accessions using amino acid analysis and one-dimensional electrophoresis. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 1802-1810. [CrossRef] · DOI
  51. Arendt, E.K.; Zannini, E. Cereal Grains for the Food and Beverage Industries; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2013.

Authors
Shruti, Shukla, A., Rahman, S. S., Suneja, P., Yadav, R., Hussain, Z., Singh, R., Yadav, S. K., Rana, J. C., Yadav, S., & Bhardwaj, R.
Affiliations
  • ICAR-NBPGR, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
  • ICAR-IARI, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
Venue
Agriculture
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-02-16
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
469
ISSN
2077-0472
Cited by
19
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Indian Council of Agricultural Research; Department of Science & Technology, Government of India, Global Environment Facility (GEF) of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (LoA No. L19INDIA173, 385 number “BT/PR23811/AGIII/103/1029/2018”)
  • Department of Biotechnology Government of India (LoA No. L19INDIA173, 385 number “BT/PR23811/AGIII/103/1029/2018”)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review