Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Response of Drip Irrigation and Fertigation on Cumin Yield, Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency Grown under Arid Climatic Conditions

Lal Mehriya, Moti, Geat, Neelam, Sarita, Singh, Hari, A. Mattar, Mohamed, O. Elansary, Hosam·2020·Agronomy
DOI 10.3390/agronomy10111711
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A three-year field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station of Mandor, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, under arid climatic conditions in the rabi season of 2016–2019 with the objectives of evaluating the effect of drip irrigation and fertigation levels on cumin plant growth, yield, oil content, water-use efficiency, and water productivity. The pooled data revealed that the drip irrigation at 0.6 cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) recorded significantly higher plant height (31.4 cm), umbels plant−1 (50.4), umbellates umbel−1 (5.07), seeds umbel−1 (5.34), test weight (4.60 g), seed yield (1063 kg ha−1), gross return (₹ 172,600 ha−1), net return (₹ 113,500 ha−1) and benefit, and cost ratio (2.9) over drip fertigation at 0.4 CPE and surface irrigation with 0.8 CPE. The fertigation with 80% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) being at par with 100% RDF recorded a significantly higher number of umbels plant−1 (50.0), umbellates umbel−1 (5.03), seeds umbellate−1 (5.24), test weight (4.67 g), seed yield (1052 kg ha−1), gross return (₹ 170,900 ha−1), net return (₹ 111,700 ha−1), and benefit cost ratio (2.9) over fertigation with 60% RDF and control. Maximum water-use efficiency (5.7 kg ha−1 mm−1) and water saving (39.04%) was observed under drip irrigation at 0.4 CPE followed by 0.6 CPE (4.8 kg ha−1 mm−1 and 18.86%, respectively).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agronomy10111711

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Weather parameters during the crop-growing period. Figure 1. Weather parameters during the crop-growing period.
Figure 1 Weather parameters during the crop-growing period. Figure 1. Weather parameters during the crop-growing period.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Effect of drip irrigation levels on water use, water productivity, water-use efficiency, and water saving (pooled data of three years). ( a ): water used and water productivity; ( b ): Water use efficiency and water saving. Figure 2. E ect of drip irrigation levels on water use, water productivity, water-use e ciency, and water saving (pooled data of three years). ( a ): water used and water productivity; ( b ): Water use e ciency and water saving.
Figure 2 Effect of drip irrigation levels on water use, water productivity, water-use efficiency, and water saving (pooled data of three years). ( a ): water used and water productivity; ( b ): Water use efficiency and water saving. Figure 2. E ect of drip irrigation levels on water use, water productivity, water-use e ciency, and water saving (pooled data of three years). ( a ): water used and water productivity; ( b ): Water use e ciency and water saving.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. Morshedi, 2015, Cuminaldehyde as the major component of Cuminum cyminum, a natural aldehyde with inhibitory effect on alpha-synuclein fibrillation and cytotoxicity, J. Food Sci., 80, H2336, 10.1111/1750-3841.13016 · DOI
  2. Wei, J., Zhang, X., Bi, Y., Miao, R., Zhang, Z., and Su, H. (2015). Anti-inflammatory effects of cumin essential oil by blocking JNK, ERK, and NF-κB signaling pathways in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. · DOI
  3. Merah, O., Sayed-Ahmad, B., Talou, T., Saad, Z., Cerny, M., Grivot, S., Evon, P., and Hijazi, A. (2020). Biochemical composition of cumin seeds, and biorefining study. Biomolecules, 10. · DOI
  4. 2010, Effect of feeding cumin (Cuminum cyminum) on the performance and some blood traits of broiler chicks, Pak. J. Nutr., 9, 72
  5. Khan, 2013, Effects of black cumin seed (Nigella sativa L.) on performance and immune system in newly evolved crossbred laying hens, Vet. Q., 33, 13, 10.1080/01652176.2013.782119 · DOI
  6. Fatima, 2018, Antioxidant potential and health benefits of cumin, J. Med. Plants, 6, 232
  7. Singh, 2017, Cuminum cyminum-A popular spice: An updated review, Pharmacogn. J., 9, 292, 10.5530/pj.2017.3.51 · DOI
  8. Bonyanpour, 2010, Effects of some variables on seed germination and seedling growth of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.), Int. J. Agric. Res., 5, 365, 10.3923/ijar.2010.365.369 · DOI
  9. Kamkar, 2011, Fungal diseases and inappropriate sowing dates, the most important reducing factors in cumin fields of Iran, a case study in Khorasan provinces, Crop Prot., 30, 208, 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.11.007 · DOI
  10. Maheria, 2012, Enhancing water use efficiency in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.), Int. J. Seed Spices, 2, 34
  11. Meena, 2017, Influence of drip irrigation along with nitrogen levels on yield attributes, yield and quality parameters of rabi drill fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill), Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 6, 2115, 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.236 · DOI
  12. Singh, 2015, Effect of irrigation techniques and planting methods on yield and water productivity of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.), Int. J. Seed Spices, 5, 92
  13. Asad, 2002, Impacts of fertigation via sprinkler irrigation on nitrate leaching and corn yield in an acid-sulphate soil in Thialand, Agric. Water Manag., 52, 197, 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00136-6 · DOI
  14. Elfving, 1982, Crop response to trickle irrigation, Hortic. Rev., 4, 1
  15. Kumar, 2002, Improving nutrient and water use efficiency through fertigation, J. Water Manag., 10, 42
  16. Clark, 1991, Water and fertilizer management of micro irrigated fresh market tomatoes, Trans. ASAE, 34, 429, 10.13031/2013.31680 · DOI
  17. Loganathan, 2016, Effect of drip fertigation on nutrient uptake and seed yield of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp.] under western agro climatic zones of Tamil Nadu, Legume Res., 39, 780
  18. Subbiah, 1956, A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils, Curr. Sci., 25, 259
  19. Standfold, 1949, Use of flame photometer in rapid soil test for K and Ca, Agron. J., 41, 446, 10.2134/agronj1949.00021962004100090012x · DOI
  20. Walkley, 1934, An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method, Soil Sci., 37, 29, 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 · DOI
  21. Viets, 1962, Fertilizers and the efficient use of water, Advances in Agronomy, Volume 14, 223, 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60439-3 · DOI
  22. Kunapara, 2018, Response of trickle irrigation regimes and lateral spacing on cumin productivity under triangular emitter configurations, J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 7, 1832
  23. Sharma, 2016, Effect of irrigation scheduling and organic manures on moisture extraction pattern, consumptive use, water use efficiency and yield of fenugreek, Int. J. Seed Spices, 6, 13
  24. Lal, 2013, Effect of irrigation and different seed treatment methods on growth and yield of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.), Int. J. Seed Spices, 3, 29
  25. Bafna, 1993, Utilization of nitrogen and water by tomato under drip irrigation system, J. Water Manag., 1, 1
  26. Raina, 1999, Effect of drip irrigation and polyethylene mulch on yield, quality and water use efficiency of tomato, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69, 430
  27. Lal, G., Singh, R., Metha, R.S., Meena, N.K., Maheriya, S.P., and Choudhary, M.K. (2019). Study on irrigation levels based on IW/CPE ratio and irrigation methods on growth and yield of fenugreek (Trigonella foenium-graecum L.). Legume Res. · DOI
  28. Kunapara, 2016, Influence of drip irrigation regimes and lateral spacing on cumin productivity, Curr. World Environ., 11, 333, 10.12944/CWE.11.1.40 · DOI
  29. Kanwar, 2018, Growth, seed yield, protein content and water use efficiency of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graceum L.) as influenced by drip irrigation regimes and fertigation levels, Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 7, 997, 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.112 · DOI
  30. Lakpale, 2007, Effect of irrigation schedule on growth, yield and economics of spice crops, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 77, 170
  31. Bhunia, 2015, Effect of drip irrigation and bioregulators on yield, economics and water use of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), J. Spices Aromat. Crops, 24, 102
  32. Bhunia, 2005, Effect of nitrogen and irrigation on water use, moisture-extraction pattern, nutrient uptake and yield of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), Indian J. Agron., 50, 73, 10.59797/ija.v50i1.5067 · DOI
  33. Singh, 2012, Drip fertigation effect on yield, water use efficiency and economics of bt cotton in semi-arid region, PKV Res. J., 36, 27
  34. Solanki, 2017, Influence of drip irrigation and fertility levels on growth, yield and water use efficiency of drilled rabi fennel (Foeniculum vulgare mill.), Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol., 6, 1972
  35. Jat, 2015, Effect of drip irrigation scheduling on growth and seed production of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) under semi-arid agro-climatic condition, Int. J. Seed Spices, 5, 67
  36. Godara, 2013, Effect of different levels of drip irrigation along with various fertigation levels on growth, yield and water use efficiency in fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.), Asian J. Hortic., 8, 758
  37. Meena, 2016, Effect of drip irrigation and nitrogen levels on growth parameters and yield of drilled rabi fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) in Saurashtra region of Gujarat, Res. Environ. Life Sci., 9, 97
  38. Pandey, 2013, Effect of drip irrigation, spacing and nitrogen fertigation on productivity of Chilli (Capsicum annum L.), Ecol. Environ., 31, 139
  39. Sampath, 2006, Effect of drip, surface irrigation method on yield and yield attributing characters in summer cotton, Res. Crops, 7, 120
  40. Veerputhrin, 2002, Effect of drip irrigation and fertigation on growth, yield of hybrid cotton, J. Agric. Resour. Manag., 1, 88
  41. Wang, 2008, Effects of drip irrigation frequency on the farmland soil water heat distribution and spring maize growth in North Chin, Trans. CSAE, 24, 39
  42. Gao, 2016, Relationship between temperature difference and yield and quality of rice at jointing and booting stage under water stress, J. Nucl. Agric. Sci., 30, 596
  43. Honnappa, 2017, Precision irrigation and fertigation for higher productivity and water use efficiency in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) in semi-arid conditions of Rajasthan, Bioscan, 12, 591
  44. Jangir, 2007, Comparative efficacy of sprinkler and surface methods of irrigation in cumin (Cuminum cyminum) under arid western Rajasthan condition, Indian J. Agron., 52, 83
  45. Mahalakshmi, 2001, Fertigation Studies in Banana under high density planting system, South Indian Hortic., 49, 80
  46. Ghanta, 1995, Effect of varying levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on growth, yield and quality of papaya (Carica papaya L.), Ann. Agric. Res., 16, 405
  47. Manohar, K.R. (2002). Evolution of Capsicum (Capsicum annum) Genotypes and Effect of Source of Fertilizers and Levels of Fertigation under Cost Effective Green House. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences].
  48. Basavaraju, 2014, Effect of fertigation on the productivity of coconut, J. Plant. Crops, 42, 198
  49. Mmolawa, 2000, Water and solute dynamics under a drip-irrigated crop: Experiments and analytical model, Trans. ASAE, 43, 1597, 10.13031/2013.3060 · DOI
  50. Mohammad, 2004, Utilization of applied fertilizer nitrogen and irrigation water by drip-fertigated squash as determined by nuclear and traditional techniques, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 68, 1, 10.1023/B:FRES.0000012229.61906.6c · DOI
  51. Mohammad, 2004, Squash yield nutrient content and soil fertility parameters in response to fertilizer application and rates of nitrogen fertigation, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 68, 99, 10.1023/B:FRES.0000019036.64212.9c · DOI
  52. Shigure, 1999, Effect of nitrogen fertigation as vegetative growth and leaf nutrient content of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia, Swingle) in Central India, Indian J. Soil Conserv., 27, 45
  53. Balasubramanian, 2000, Increasing water use efficiency through fertigation in cotton, J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., 25, 92
  54. Harisha, 2017, Soil fertility and micronutrient uptake by fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) as influenced by micronutrients fertilization, Environ. Ecol., 35, 514
  55. Laribi, 2009, Water deficit effects on caraway (Carum carvi L.) growth, essential oil and fatty acid composition, Ind. Crops Prod., 31, 34
  56. Jordan, 2003, Watering level effect on Thymus hyemalislange essential oil yield and composition, J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 5420, 10.1021/jf034335m · DOI
  57. Khazaie, 2008, Effect of irrigation frequency and planting density on herbage biomass and oil production of thyme (Thymus vulgaris) and hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis), Ind. Crops Prod., 27, 315, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.11.007 · DOI
  58. Naresha, 2018, Quality, yield and economics of rabi groundnut as influenced by irrigation scheduling and phosphogypsum levels, Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 7, 3292, 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.379 · DOI
  59. Chattopaddhyay, 2012, Response of rapeseed to various sources and levels of sulphur in red and lateritic soils of west Bengal, India, Int. J. Plant Anim. Environ. Sci., 2, 50
  60. Patel, 2009, Yield attributes, yield, quality and uptake of nutrients by summer groundnut, Arachis hypogaea L. as influenced by sources and levels of sulphur under varying irrigation schedules, J. Oilseeds Res., 26, 119
  61. Satyanarayan, 1986, Effect of graded levels of N, P, plant spacing on sunflower, J. Oilseed Res., 3, 116
  62. Premi, 2013, Green manuring, mustard residue recycling and fertilizer application affects productivity and sustainability of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in Indian semi-arid tropics, Ind. Crops Prod., 41, 423, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.04.030 · DOI
  63. Jain, 2018, Drip fertigation and irrigation interval effects on growth, productivity, nutrient, and water economy in summer peanut, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 49, 2406, 10.1080/00103624.2018.1510951 · DOI
  64. Rao, 2010, Effect of micro-irrigation on productivity and water use of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) at varying fertility levels, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 80, 507
  65. Sadarunnisa, 2010, Effect of fertigation on growth and yield of turmeric cv. Mydukur, J. Hortic. Sci., 5, 78, 10.24154/jhs.v5i1.508 · DOI
  66. Giana, 2019, Effect of drip irrigation and fertigation on yield and economics of fennel, Int. J. Chem. Stud., 7, 52
  67. Ankush, 2017, Yield, quality, nutrient and water use efficiency of tomato as affected by different fertigation rates through drip irrigation system, Indian J. Agric. Res., 51, 478
  68. Pawar, 2013, Growth, yield and water use in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) under drip Fertigation, Indian J. Agron., 58, 396, 10.59797/ija.v58i3.4206 · DOI
  69. Rathore, 2014, Micro-irrigation and fertigation improves gas exchange, productivity traits and economics of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern) and Cosson) under semi-arid conditions, Aust. J. Crop Sci., 8, 582
  70. Datta, 2006, Effect of irrigation level on growth, yield and evapo-transpiration in coriander, Indian J. Hortic., 63, 428
  71. Bandyopadhyay, 2009, Efficient utilization of limited available water in wheat through proper irrigation scheduling and integrated nutrient management under different cropping systems in a vertisol, J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 57, 121
  72. Wang, 2001, Recovery of 15N-labeled urea and soil nitrogen dynamics as affected by irrigation management and nitrogen application rate in a double rice cropping system, Plant Soil, 343, 195, 10.1007/s11104-010-0648-z · DOI
  73. Kar, 2005, Phenological based irrigation scheduling and determination of crop coefficient of winter maize in rice fallow of eastern India, Agric. Water Manag., 75, 169, 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.01.002 · DOI
  74. Turner, 1987, Crop water deficits: A decade of progress, Adv. Agron., 39, 1
  75. Kipkorir, 2002, Seasonal water production functions and yield response factors for maize and onion in Perkerra, Kenya, Agric. Water Manag., 56, 229, 10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00034-3 · DOI
  76. Mehta, 2010, Growth and yield of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) as influenced by irrigation levels and weed management practices, J. Spices Aromat. Crops, 19, 14

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lal Mehriya, M., Geat, N., Sarita, Singh, H., A. Mattar, M., & O. Elansary, H.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Station, Mandor, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342304, Rajasthan, India
  • College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342304, Rajasthan, India
  • Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sirohi, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342304, Rajasthan, India
  • Department of Agricultural Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
  • Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
ORCID
Venue
Agronomy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-04
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
1711
ISSN
2073-4395
DOI
10.3390/agronomy10111711
Cited by
14
References
0
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
King Saud University (RG-1440-012)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.