The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant Disease Recognition Model Based on Improved YOLOv5
Open accessAbstract
To accurately recognize plant diseases under complex natural conditions, an improved plant disease-recognition model based on the original YOLOv5 network model was established. First, a new InvolutionBottleneck module was used to reduce the numbers of parameters and calculations, and to capture long-distance information in the space. Second, an SE module was added to improve the sensitivity of the model to channel features. Finally, the loss function ‘Generalized Intersection over Union’ was changed to ‘Efficient Intersection over Union’ to address the former’s degeneration into ‘Intersection over Union’. These proposed methods were used to improve the target recognition effect of the network model. In the experimental phase, to verify the effectiveness of the model, sample images were randomly selected from the constructed rubber tree disease database to form training and test sets. The test results showed that the mean average precision of the improved YOLOv5 network reached 70%, which is 5.4% higher than that of the original YOLOv5 network. The precision values of this model for powdery mildew and anthracnose detection were 86.5% and 86.8%, respectively. The overall detection performance of the improved YOLOv5 network was significantly better compared with those of the original YOLOv5 and the YOLOX_nano network models. The improved model accurately identified plant diseases under natural conditions, and it provides a technical reference for the prevention and control of plant diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00745 · Cited by 35,667
Overview and methods of correlation filter algorithms in object tracking
Liu, S., Liu, D., Srivastava, G., Połap, D., & Woźniak, M. (2021) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-020-00161-4 · Cited by 305
Cited by
Wang, J., Dai, H., Chen, T., Liu, H., Zhang, X., Zhong, Q., & Lu, R. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33804-w · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Wu, R., Lin, Y., Li, C., Chen, S., Yuan, Z., Chen, S., & Zou, X.
- Venue
- Agronomy
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-01-31
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 365
- ISSN
- 2073-4395 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210261474
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Disease Recognition Model Based on Improved YOLOv5. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/agronomy12020365
- The paper
- Chen, Z., Wu, R., Lin, Y., Li, C., Chen, S., Yuan, Z., Chen, S., & Zou, X. (2022). Plant Disease Recognition Model Based on Improved YOLOv5. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.