Cited by 8EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEpilepsy research and treatmentECG Monitoring and Analysis

GT-STAFG: Graph Transformer with Spatiotemporal Attention Fusion Gate for Epileptic Seizure Detection in Imbalanced EEG Data

Open access
Nafea, Mohamed Sami, Ismail, Zool Hilmi·2025·AI

Abstract

Background: Electroencephalography (EEG) assists clinicians in diagnosing epileptic seizures by recording brain electrical activity. Existing models process spatiotemporal features inefficiently either through cascaded spatiotemporal architectures or static functional connectivity, limiting their ability to capture deeper spatial–temporal correlations. Objectives: To address these limitations, we propose a Graph Transformer with Spatiotemporal Attention Fusion Gate (GT-STAFG). Methods: We analyzed 18-channel EEG data sampled at 200 Hz, transformed into the frequency domain, and segmented into 30- second windows. The graph transformer exploits dynamic graph data, while STAFG leverages self-attention and gating mechanisms to capture complex interactions by augmenting graph features with both spatial and temporal information. The clinical significance of extracted features was validated using the Integrated Gradients attribution method, emphasizing the clinical relevance of the proposed model. Results: GT-STAFG achieves the highest area under the precision–recall curve (AUPRC) scores of 0.605 on the TUSZ dataset and 0.498 on the CHB-MIT dataset, surpassing baseline models and demonstrating strong cross-patient generalization on imbalanced datasets. We applied transfer learning to leverage knowledge from the TUSZ dataset when analyzing the CHB-MIT dataset, yielding an average improvement of 8.3 percentage points in AUPRC. Conclusions: Our approach has the potential to enhance patient outcomes and optimize healthcare utilization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ai6060120

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Veličković, P.; Casanova, A.; Liò, P.; Cucurull, G.; Romero, A.; Bengio, Y. Graph Attention Networks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018-Conference Track Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 30 April-3 May 2018; pp. 1-12.
  2. Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A.N.; Kaiser, Ł.; Polosukhin, I. Attention Is All You Need. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA, 4-9 December 2017; pp. 5999-6009.
  3. Yang, C.; Brandon Westover, M.; Sun, J. BIOT: Biosignal Transformer for Cross-Data Learning in the Wild. Adv. Neural Inf. Process Syst. 2023, 36, 78240-78260.
  4. Arevalo, J.; Solorio, T.; Montes-Y-Gómez, M.; González, F.A. Gated Multimodal Units for Information Fusion. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017-Workshop Track Proceedings, Toulon, France, 24-26 April 2017.
  5. Sundararajan, M.; Taly, A.; Yan, Q. (Integrated Gradient) Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2017, Sydney, Australia, 6-11 August 2017; Volume 7, pp. 5109-5118.
  6. Shoeb, A.; Guttag, J. CHB-MIT Dataset. In Proceedings of the ICML 2010-Proceedings, 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel, 21-24 June 2010; pp. 975-982.
  7. Ulmer, D.; Hardmeier, C.; Frellsen, J. Deep-Significance-Easy and Meaningful Statistical Significance Testing in the Age of Neural Networks. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2204.06815. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nafea, M. S., & Ismail, Z. H.
Affiliations
University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Ismail, Zool Hilmi
Venue
AI
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-06-09
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
120
ISSN
2673-2688 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411187431
Cited by
8
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
seizure detection, EEG, graph transformer, class imbalance, self-attention, gating mechanism, functional connectivity, transfer learning, CHB-MIT dataset, seizure prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review