The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are We Approaching Peak Meat Consumption? Analysis of Meat Consumption from 2000 to 2019 in 35 Countries and Its Relationship to Gross Domestic Product
Abstract
Growing prosperity, but also disease outbreaks, natural disasters, and consumer preferences are changing global meat consumption. We investigated the 2000–2019 trends in 35 countries monitored by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. We also tested relationships with Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Several countries appeared to be reaching peak consumption of some meats, and three (New Zealand, Canada, and Switzerland) have reached this. Poultry consumption increased over time in most countries, and beef and mutton/lamb consumption decreased in many. Using cluster analysis, we divided countries into two clusters: one in which increases in GDP per capita matched increases in meat consumption; and a second one of nine countries, for which there was no association between per capita change in GDP and meat consumption. There was evidence of a tipping point around USD 40,000 of GDP per capita, after which increases in economic well-being do not lead to increased meat consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Protein intakes observed in the general population that appear to match those of younger MAs may be attributed to Australia’s meat-eating culture encouraging greater consumption [61,62]”
From Dietary Intake of Masters Athletes: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31788-4 · Cited by 10,880
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216 · Cited by 6,085
Clark, M., & Tilman, D. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5 · Cited by 989
Curbing global meat consumption: Emerging evidence of a second nutrition transition
Vranken, L., Avermaete, T., Petalios, D., & Mathijs, E. (2014) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.009 · Cited by 223
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Sanchez-Sabate, R., and Sabaté, J. (2019). Consumer attitudes towards environmental concerns of meat consumption: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16. · DOI · Paper page
- Alexander, 2016, Human appropriation of land for food: The role of diet, Glob. Environ. Chang., 41, 88, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.09.005 · DOI
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2021, September 27). Global Warming at 1.5 °C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C Above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, Summary for Policymakers, Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_SPM_version_report_LR.pdf. · DOI · Paper page
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2021, September 27). Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, Summary for Policymakers, Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2020/02/SPM_Updated-Jan20.pdf. · DOI · Paper page
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2021, January 25). Meat Consumption (Indicator). Available online: https://doi.org/10.1787/fa290fd0-en. · DOI
- Ward, 1963, Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 58, 236, 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 · DOI · Paper page
- Potts, 2008, New Zealand vegetarians: At odds with their nation, Soc. Anim., 16, 336, 10.1163/156853008X357667 · DOI
- Seleshe, 2014, Meat consumption culture in Ethiopia, Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Res., 34, 7, 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.1.7 · DOI
- Binns, 2021, Climate change, food supply, and dietary guidelines, Annu. Rev. Public Health, 42, 233, 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105044 · DOI
- Marinova, 2019, Planetary health and reduction in meat consumption, Sustain. Earth, 2, 3, 10.1186/s42055-019-0010-0 · DOI
- Elleby, 2020, Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global agricultural markets, Environ. Resour Econ., 76, 1067, 10.1007/s10640-020-00473-6 · DOI
- Henchion, M., Moloney, A.P., Hyland, J., Zimmermann, J., and McCarthy, S. (2021). Review: Trends for meat, milk and egg consumption for the next decades and the role played by livestock systems in the global production of proteins. Animal, in press. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Dietary Intake of Masters Athletes: A Systematic Review
Guo, S., Shaoni, G. L. L., Stuart-Smith, W. A., Davies, A. J., & Gifford, J. A. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15234973 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitton, C., Bogueva, D., Marinova, D., & Phillips, C. J. C.
- Venue
- Animals
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-12-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3466
- ISSN
- 2076-2615
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
