Cited by 24Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expectations versus Reality of Designer Dog Ownership in the United States

Open access

Abstract

“Designer dogs”, which are the hybrid offspring that result from intentionally breeding dogs belonging to different breeds, are an extremely popular pet choice in the United States. Poodle mixes, often called “doodles”, are a very common type of designer dog. However, there are many misconceptions surrounding them, and the reality of owning one may not match the owner’s expectations. For instance, many people believe these dogs to be non-shedding and hypoallergenic, although this is not always the case. This study explored whether the reality of owning a doodle matches owner expectations. For comparison purposes, we also asked owners of non-doodle dogs about their expectations versus reality. Our survey-based study included 2191 owners of doodles and non-doodle dogs recruited via groups of dog owners on Facebook and Reddit. The data showed that, when selecting their dogs, doodle owners were more influenced than non-doodle owners by their dog’s appearance and by the perception that doodles are good with children and are generally healthy. Doodle owners reported being highly satisfied with their dogs; nevertheless, more than twice as many doodle owners than owners of the other groups of dogs reported that their dog’s maintenance requirements, such as their need for regular grooming, were more intensive than they had expected. This finding suggests that those interested in owning doodles would benefit from having more information about their dog’s grooming needs so they can decide whether they have the time and money required to meet their dog’s welfare needs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani12233247

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breeding dogs solely for their physical appearance to increase profits is a form of animal abuse.

    “Breeding dogs solely for their physical appearance in order to increase profits is itself a real form of animal abuse [17].”

    From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes breeding for visual appeal and high prices as controversial, and says profit-driven practices that disregard dogs’ health or behavior cause welfare problems. It does not say that breeding for appearance and profit is, by itself, animal abuse; the citing sentence makes a stronger categorical claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Seymour, S. (2022, April 10). American Kennel Club Expands Its Pack in 2022, Available online: https://www.akc.org/press-releases/american-kennel-club-expands-pack-2022/.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hladky-Krage, B., & Hoffman, C. L.
Affiliations
Canisius College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hladky-Krage, Bridget
  • Hoffman, Christy L.
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-11-23
Volume
12
Issue
23
Pages
3247
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309729103
Cited by
21
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
the Association for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA®) Open-Access Publishing Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
dog ownership, owner expectations, owner satisfaction, hypoallergenicity, shedding, pet welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review