The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inroads into Equestrian Safety: Rider-Reported Factors Contributing to Horse-Related Accidents and Near Misses on Australian Roads
Abstract
Horse riding and horse-related interactions are inherently dangerous. When they occur on public roads, the risk profile of equestrian activities is complicated by interactions with other road users. Research has identified speed, proximity, visibility, conspicuity and mutual misunderstanding as factors contributing to accidents and near misses. However, little is known about their significance or incidence in Australia. To explore road safety issues amongst Australian equestrians, we conducted an online survey. More than half of all riders (52%) reported having experienced at least one accident or near miss in the 12 months prior to the survey. Whilst our findings confirm the factors identified overseas, we also identified issues around rider misunderstanding of road rules and driver misunderstanding of rider hand signals. Of particular concern, we also found reports of potentially dangerous rider-directed road rage. We identify several areas for potential safety intervention including (1) identifying equestrians as vulnerable road users and horses as sentient decision-making vehicles (2) harmonising laws regarding passing horses, (3) mandating personal protective equipment, (4) improving road signage, (5) comprehensive data collection, (6) developing mutual understanding amongst road-users, (7) safer road design and alternative riding spaces; and (8) increasing investment in horse-related safety initiatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research supports the wearing of helmets as a safety tool [113,114,115,116,117] however, not all equestrians wear one.”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [113]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Howell, 2010, Equine influenza-horsing about with a quarantine crisis, Austr. J. Emerg. Manag., 25, 23
- Thompson, K., and Nesci, C. (2013). Over-riding concerns: Developing safe relations in the high-risk interspecies sport of eventing. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport. · DOI · Paper page
- Taylor, N., and Signal, T. (2011). Theorising Animals, Brill. · DOI
- Adelman, M., and Knijnik, J. (2013). Gender and Equestrian Sport, Springer. · DOI
- Road Safety Observatory Horse Riders. Available online: http://www.roadsafetyobservatory.com/Review/10092.
- Constant, 2010, Protecting vulnerable road users from injury, PLoS Med., 7, e1000228, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000228 · DOI
- Heleski, C., and Wickens, C. (2013, January 17–). Road safety: Is there a relationship between ‘near misses’ and the use of rider and horse reflective/fluorescent equipment. Proceedings of the 9th International Equitation Science Conference, University of Delaware Printing Services, Newark, DE, USA & University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, Kennett Square, PA, USA.
- Chapman, 2011, Equine road user safety: Public attitudes, understandings and beliefs from a qualitative study in the united kingdom, Accident Anal. Prev., 43, 2173, 10.1016/j.aap.2011.06.009 · DOI
- Smith, B., Thompson, K., and Taylor, M. (2015). What’s the big deal? Responder experiences of large animal rescue in australia. PLOS Curr. Dis., 1. · DOI
- Thompson, 2015, Helping hands, hurting hooves: The need for a multidisciplinary paradigm of large animal rescue, Autr. J. Emerg. Manag., 30, 53
- Lunney, D., Munn, A., and Meikle, W. (2008). Too Close for Comfort: Contentious Issues in Human-Wildlife Encounters, Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales. · DOI
- Wetmore, 2004, Redefining risks and redistributing responsibilities: Building networks to increase automobile safety, Sci. Technol. Human Values, 29, 377, 10.1177/0162243904264486 · DOI
- Wolframm, I. (2013). The Science of Equestrian Sports: Theory, Practice and Performance of the Equestrian Rider, Routledge. · DOI
- Gupta, 2006, Foxes, hounds, and horses: Who or which?, Soc. Anim., 14, 107, 10.1163/156853006776137113 · DOI
- White, 2012, Companion animals, natural disasters and the law: An australian perspective, Animals, 2, 380, 10.3390/ani2030380 · DOI
- Belk, 1996, Metaphoric relationships with pets, Soc. Anim., 4, 121, 10.1163/156853096X00115 · DOI · Paper page
- Belk, 1988, Possessions and the extended self, J. Consumer Res., 15, 139, 10.1086/209154 · DOI · Paper page
- Dant, 2004, The driver-car, Theory Culture Soc., 21, 61, 10.1177/0263276404046061 · DOI
- Gillett, J., and Gilbert, M. (2014). Sport, Animals, and Society, Routledge. · DOI
- Haigh, 2015, Helmet use amongst equestrians: Harnessing social and attitudinal factors revealed in online forums, Animals, 5, 576, 10.3390/ani5030373 · DOI
- Thompson, 2013, Save me, save my dog: Increasing natural disaster preparedness and survival by addressing human-animal relationships, Austr. J. Commun., 40, 123
- Thompson, 2014, No pet or their person left behind: Increasing the disaster resilience of vulnerable groups through animal attachment, activities and networks, Animals, 4, 214, 10.3390/ani4020214 · DOI
- Thompson, 2015, For pets’ sake, save yourself: Motivating emergency and disaster preparedness through relations of animal guardianship, Autr. J. Emerg. Manag., 30, 43
- Thompson, 2015, A critical review of horse-related risk: A research agenda for safer mounts, riders and equestrian cultures, Animals, 5, 561, 10.3390/ani5030372 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, K., & Matthews, C.
- Affiliations
- The Appleton Institute, CQUniversity, 44 Greenhill Road, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia
- School of Natural and Built Environments, Civil Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- ORCID
- Thompson, Kirrilly
- Venue
- Animals
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2015-07-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 592-609
- ISSN
- 2076-2615
- PMC
- PMC4598696
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
