Decoding visual motions from EEG using attention based RNN.
Open accessAbstract
The main objective of this paper is to use deep neural networks to decode the electroencephalography (EEG) signals evoked when individuals perceive four types of motion stimuli (contraction, expansion, rotation, and translation). Methods for single-trial and multi-trial EEG classification are both investigated in this study. Attention mechanisms and a variant of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are incorporated as the decoding model. Attention mechanisms emphasize task-related responses and reduce redundant information of EEG, whereas RNN learns feature representations for classification from the processed EEG data. To promote generalization of the decoding model, a novel online data augmentation method that randomly averages EEG sequences to generate artificial signals is proposed for single-trial EEG. For our dataset, the data augmentation method improves the accuracy of our model (based on RNN) and two benchmark models (based on convolutional neural networks) by 5.60%, 3.92%, and 3.02%, respectively. The attention-based RNN reaches mean accuracies of 67.18% for single-trial EEG decoding with data augmentation. When performing multi-trial EEG classification, the amount of training data decreases linearly after averaging, which may result in poor generalization. To address this deficiency, we devised three schemes to randomly combine data for network training. Accordingly, the results indicate that the proposed strategies effectively prevent overfitting and improve the correct classification rate compared with averaging EEG fixedly (by up to 19.20%). The highest accuracy of the three strategies for multi-trial EEG classification achieves 82.92%. The decoding performance for the methods proposed in this work indicates they have application potential in the brain–computer interface (BCI) system based on visual motion perception.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Random averaging DA obtained significant improvement for RNN and CNN in the VEP task.
“RNN and CNN were used to classify different specific frequencies in the visual evoked potential (VEP) task and obtained significant improvement after DA.”
From Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2020
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces
Lawhern, V. J., Solon, A. J., Waytowich, N. R., Gordon, S. M., Hung, C. P., & Lance, B. J. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c · Cited by 5,115 · see citing works
Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization
Schirrmeister, R. T., Springenberg, J. T., Fiederer, L. D. J., Glasstetter, M., Eggensperger, K., Tangermann, M., Hutter, F., Burgard, W., & Ball, T. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23730 · Cited by 3,751 · see citing works
Data augmentation for EEG-based emotion recognition with deep convolutional neural networks
Wang, F., Zhong, S.-H., Peng, J., Jiang, J., & Liu, Y. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73600-6_8 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review
He, C., Liu, J., Zhu, Y., & Du, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.765525 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Algorithm and hardware considerations for real-time neural signal on-implant processing
Zhang, Z., Savolainen, O. W., & Constandinou, T. G. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac5268 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, D., Liu, Y., Zhou, Z., Yu, Y., & Liang, X.
- Affiliations
- National University of Defense Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Yadong
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-08-14
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5662
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3049043038
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U19A2083)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- visual motion perception, EEG decoding, attention-based recurrent neural network, single-trial EEG classification, online data augmentation, brain-computer interface, overfitting reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review