Cited by 10Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesImbalanced Data Classification Techniques

Convolution-GRU Based on Independent Component Analysis for fMRI Analysis with Small and Imbalanced Samples

Open access
Wang, Shan, Duan, Feng, Zhang, Mingxin·2020·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a commonly used method of brain research. However, due to the complexity and particularity of the fMRI task, it is difficult to find enough subjects, resulting in a small and, often, imbalanced dataset. A dataset with small samples causes overfitting of the learning model, and the imbalance will make the model insensitive to the minority class, which has been a problem in classification. It is of great significance to classify fMRI data with small and imbalanced samples. In the present study, we propose a 3-step method on a small and imbalanced fMRI dataset from a word-scene memory task. The steps of the method are as follows: (1) An independent component analysis is performed to reduce the dimension of data; (2) The synthetic minority oversampling technique is used to generate new samples of the minority class to balance data; (3) A convolution-Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) network is used to classify the independent component signals, indicating whether the subjects are performing episodic memory tasks. The accuracy of the proposed method is 72.2%, which improves the classification performance compared with traditional classifiers such as support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LGR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and this study gives a biomarker for evaluating the reactivation of episodic memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app10217465

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S., Duan, F., & Zhang, M.
Affiliations
Nankai University (CN)
Corresponding author
Duan, Feng
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-23
Volume
10
Issue
21
Pages
7465
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3096960547
Cited by
10
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFE0129700)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61673224)
  • Research Fellowship for International Young Scientists (No. 61850410526, No. 61850410524)
  • Tianjin Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 18JCJQJC46100)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Keywords
fMRI classification, small sample size, class imbalance, independent component analysis, SMOTE, episodic memory, dimensionality reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review