The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Student Performance Using Data Mining and Learning Analytics Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
The prediction of student academic performance has drawn considerable attention in education. However, although the learning outcomes are believed to improve learning and teaching, prognosticating the attainment of student outcomes remains underexplored. A decade of research work conducted between 2010 and November 2020 was surveyed to present a fundamental understanding of the intelligent techniques used for the prediction of student performance, where academic success is strictly measured using student learning outcomes. The electronic bibliographic databases searched include ACM, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Scopus, Springer, and Web of Science. Eventually, we synthesized and analyzed a total of 62 relevant papers with a focus on three perspectives, (1) the forms in which the learning outcomes are predicted, (2) the predictive analytics models developed to forecast student learning, and (3) the dominant factors impacting student outcomes. The best practices for conducting systematic literature reviews, e.g., PICO and PRISMA, were applied to synthesize and report the main results. The attainment of learning outcomes was measured mainly as performance class standings (i.e., ranks) and achievement scores (i.e., grades). Regression and supervised machine learning models were frequently employed to classify student performance. Finally, student online learning activities, term assessment grades, and student academic emotions were the most evident predictors of learning outcomes. We conclude the survey by highlighting some major research challenges and suggesting a summary of significant recommendations to motivate future works in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 · Cited by 2,669
Shmueli, G. (2010) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/10-sts330 · Cited by 2,517
A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research
Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2011) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1954824 · Cited by 1,849
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1355 · Cited by 1,120
A Review on Predicting Student's Performance Using Data Mining Techniques
Shahiri, A. M., Husain, W., & Rashid, N. A. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.157 · Cited by 840
The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027 · Cited by 766 · cited 1×
“, EDM) are proclaimed to improve the attainment of student learning outcomes [108].”
BackgroundEducational data mining: A survey and a data mining-based analysis of recent works
Peña-Ayala, A. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.042 · Cited by 660
Big Data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges
Daniel, B. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12230 · Cited by 610
Cited by
Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: A systematic review
Salas-Pilco, S., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12080569 · Cited by 326
Fahd, K., Venkatraman, S., Miah, S. J., & Ahmed, K. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10741-7 · Cited by 110
Learning analytics: state of the art
Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Morales-Menendez, R., Escobar, C. A., & Ramírez Mendoza, R. A. (2022) · International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) · doi:10.1007/s12008-022-00930-0 · Cited by 93
Student Dataset from Tecnologico de Monterrey in Mexico to Predict Dropout in Higher Education
Alvarado-Uribe, J., Mejía-Almada, P., Masetto Herrera, A. L., Molontay, R., Hilliger, I., Hegde, V., Montemayor Gallegos, J. E., Ramírez Díaz, R. A., & Ceballos, H. G. (2022) · Data · doi:10.3390/data7090119 · Cited by 55
Wang, Q., & Mousavi, A. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13282 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Namoun, A., & Alshanqiti, A.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-12-29
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3118164373
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Student Performance Using Data Mining and Learning Analytics Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/app11010237
- The paper
- Namoun, A., & Alshanqiti, A. (2020). Predicting Student Performance Using Data Mining and Learning Analytics Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.