The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anomaly Detection Using Deep Neural Network for IoT Architecture
Open accessAbstract
The revolutionary idea of the internet of things (IoT) architecture has gained enormous popularity over the last decade, resulting in an exponential growth in the IoT networks, connected devices, and the data processed therein. Since IoT devices generate and exchange sensitive data over the traditional internet, security has become a prime concern due to the generation of zero-day cyberattacks. A network-based intrusion detection system (NIDS) can provide the much-needed efficient security solution to the IoT network by protecting the network entry points through constant network traffic monitoring. Recent NIDS have a high false alarm rate (FAR) in detecting the anomalies, including the novel and zero-day anomalies. This paper proposes an efficient anomaly detection mechanism using mutual information (MI), considering a deep neural network (DNN) for an IoT network. A comparative analysis of different deep-learning models such as DNN, Convolutional Neural Network, Recurrent Neural Network, and its different variants, such as Gated Recurrent Unit and Long Short-term Memory is performed considering the IoT-Botnet 2020 dataset. Experimental results show the improvement of 0.57–2.6% in terms of the model’s accuracy, while at the same time reducing the FAR by 0.23–7.98% to show the effectiveness of the DNN-based NIDS model compared to the well-known deep learning models. It was also observed that using only the 16–35 best numerical features selected using MI instead of 80 features of the dataset result in almost negligible degradation in the model’s performance but helped in decreasing the overall model’s complexity. In addition, the overall accuracy of the DL-based models is further improved by almost 0.99–3.45% in terms of the detection accuracy considering only the top five categorical and numerical features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Intrusion Detection System Using a Deep Neural Network With Gated Recurrent Units
Xu, C., Shen, J., Du, X., & Zhang, F. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2867564 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Abdullahi, M., Baashar, Y., Alhussian, H., Alwadain, A., Aziz, N., Capretz, L. F., & Abdulkadir, S. J. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11020198 · Cited by 361
Vijayakumar, K. P., Pradeep, K., Balasundaram, A., & Prusty, M. R. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11041072 · Cited by 66
(2025) · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2026.101938 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, Z., Shahid Khan, A., Nisar, K., Haider, I., Hassan, R., Haque, M. R., Tarmizi, S., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-07-30
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7050
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3192676711
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anomaly Detection Using Deep Neural Network for IoT Architecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/app11157050
- The paper
- Ahmad, Z., Shahid Khan, A., Nisar, K., Haider, I., Hassan, R., Haque, M. R., Tarmizi, S., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2021). Anomaly Detection Using Deep Neural Network for IoT Architecture. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11157050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.