The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Cybersecurity Attacks in Internet of Things Using Artificial Intelligence Methods: A Systematic Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, technology has advanced to the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0), where the Internet of things (IoTs), fog computing, computer security, and cyberattacks have evolved exponentially on a large scale. The rapid development of IoT devices and networks in various forms generate enormous amounts of data which in turn demand careful authentication and security. Artificial intelligence (AI) is considered one of the most promising methods for addressing cybersecurity threats and providing security. In this study, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) that categorize, map and survey the existing literature on AI methods used to detect cybersecurity attacks in the IoT environment. The scope of this SLR includes an in-depth investigation on most AI trending techniques in cybersecurity and state-of-art solutions. A systematic search was performed on various electronic databases (SCOPUS, Science Direct, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, ACM, and MDPI). Out of the identified records, 80 studies published between 2016 and 2021 were selected, surveyed and carefully assessed. This review has explored deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) techniques used in IoT security, and their effectiveness in detecting attacks. However, several studies have proposed smart intrusion detection systems (IDS) with intelligent architectural frameworks using AI to overcome the existing security and privacy challenges. It is found that support vector machines (SVM) and random forest (RF) are among the most used methods, due to high accuracy detection another reason may be efficient memory. In addition, other methods also provide better performance such as extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), neural networks (NN) and recurrent neural networks (RNN). This analysis also provides an insight into the AI roadmap to detect threats based on attack categories. Finally, we present recommendations for potential future investigations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
N-BaIoT—Network-Based Detection of IoT Botnet Attacks Using Deep Autoencoders
Meidan, Y., Bohadana, M., Mathov, Y., Mirsky, Y., Shabtai, A., Breitenbacher, D., & Elovici, Y. (2018) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2018.03367731 · Cited by 1,483
Distributed attack detection scheme using deep learning approach for Internet of Things
Diro, A. A., & Chilamkurti, N. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.08.043 · Cited by 1,053
Attack and anomaly detection in IoT sensors in IoT sites using machine learning approaches
Hasan, M., Islam, M. M., Zarif, M. I. I., & Hashem, M. M. A. (2019) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2019.100059 · Cited by 841
Sharma, R., Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Kumar, V., & Kumar, A. (2020) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2020.104926 · Cited by 766
Moustafa, N. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102994 · Cited by 721
Machine Learning DDoS Detection for Consumer Internet of Things Devices
Doshi, R., Apthorpe, N., & Feamster, N. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw.2018.00013 · Cited by 680
Security and privacy in smart farming: challenges and opportunities
Gupta, M., Abdelsalam, M., Khorsandroo, S., & Mittal, S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2975142 · Cited by 609
Mohanta, B. K., Jena, D., Satapathy, U., & Patnaik, S. (2020) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100227 · Cited by 488
Machine learning based solutions for security of Internet of Things (IoT): A survey
Tahsien, S. M., Karimipour, H., & Spachos, P. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102630 · Cited by 470
Cited by
Moustafa, N., Koroniotis, N., Keshk, M., Zomaya, A. Y., & Tari, Z. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3280465 · Cited by 266
Application of Large Language Models to DDoS Attack Detection
Guastalla, M., Li, Y., Hekmati, A., & Krishnamachari, B. (2024) · Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51630-6_6 · Cited by 65
Automated cyberattack detection using optimal ensemble deep learning model
Vaiyapuri, T., Shankar, K., Rajendran, S., Kumar, S., Gaur, V., Gupta, D., & Alharbi, M. (2024) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.4899 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdullahi, M., Baashar, Y., Alhussian, H., Alwadain, A., Aziz, N., Capretz, L. F., & Abdulkadir, S. J.
- Venue
- Electronics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-01-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 198
- ISSN
- 2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206713037
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Cybersecurity Attacks in Internet of Things Using Artificial Intelligence Methods: A Systematic Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/electronics11020198
- The paper
- Abdullahi, M., Baashar, Y., Alhussian, H., Alwadain, A., Aziz, N., Capretz, L. F., & Abdulkadir, S. J. (2022). Detecting Cybersecurity Attacks in Internet of Things Using Artificial Intelligence Methods: A Systematic Literature Review. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11020198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.