The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Two-Stage Industrial Defect Detection Framework Based on Improved-YOLOv5 and Optimized-Inception-ResnetV2 Models
Open accessAbstract
Aiming to address the currently low accuracy of domestic industrial defect detection, this paper proposes a Two-Stage Industrial Defect Detection Framework based on Improved-YOLOv5 and Optimized-Inception-ResnetV2, which completes positioning and classification tasks through two specific models. In order to make the first-stage recognition more effective at locating insignificant small defects with high similarity on the steel surface, we improve YOLOv5 from the backbone network, the feature scales of the feature fusion layer, and the multiscale detection layer. In order to enable second-stage recognition to better extract defect features and achieve accurate classification, we embed the convolutional block attention module (CBAM) attention mechanism module into the Inception-ResnetV2 model, then optimize the network architecture and loss function of the accurate model. Based on the Pascal Visual Object Classes 2007 (VOC2007) dataset, the public dataset NEU-DET, and the optimized dataset Enriched-NEU-DET, we conducted multiple sets of comparative experiments on the Improved-YOLOv5 and Inception-ResnetV2. The testing results show that the improvement is obvious. In order to verify the superiority and adaptability of the two-stage framework, we first test based on the Enriched-NEU-DET dataset, and further use AUBO-i5 robot, Intel RealSense D435 camera, and other industrial steel equipment to build actual industrial scenes. In experiments, a two-stage framework achieves the best performance of 83.3% mean average precision (mAP), evaluated on the Enriched-NEU-DET dataset, and 91.0% on our built industrial defect environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, in the actual production environment, the interference of the environment is serious such as uneven lighting, light reflection, noise, motion blur, the existence of many false defects, and a low contrast of background clutter, resulting in the recognition effect being often less than ideal [8].”
From Steel Surface Defect Recognition: A Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
(2016) · Cited by 31,590
CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module
Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., & Kweon, I. S. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 · Cited by 25,853
SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector
Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y., & Berg, A. C. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 · Cited by 22,128
The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge
Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · Cited by 19,599
Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2389824 · Cited by 11,971
YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection
Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.-Y., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.10934 · Cited by 10,307
ECA-Net: Efficient Channel Attention for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Wang, Q., Wu, B., Zhu, P., Li, P., Zuo, W., & Hu, Q. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01155 · Cited by 9,641
Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning
Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., & Alemi, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 · Cited by 4,636
A Tutorial on the Cross-Entropy Method
de Boer, P.-T., Kroese, D. P., Mannor, S., & Rubinstein, R. Y. (2005) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-005-5724-z · Cited by 3,110
Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning
Zeiler, M. D., Taylor, G. W., & Fergus, R. (2011) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126474 · Cited by 1,293
Efficient and Accurate Arbitrary-Shaped Text Detection With Pixel Aggregation Network
Wang, W., Xie, E., Song, X., Zang, Y., Wang, W., Lü, T., Yu, G., & Shen, C. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00853 · Cited by 661
Automatic localization of casting defects with convolutional neural networks
Ferguson, M., Ak, R., Lee, Y.-T. T., & Law, K. H. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2017.8258115 · Cited by 220
ImageNet pre-trained models with batch normalizationPreprint
Simon, M., Rodner, E., & Denzler, J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.01452 · Cited by 157
Railway Subgrade Defect Automatic Recognition Method Based on Improved Faster R-CNN
Xu, X., Lei, Y., & Yang, F. (2018) · Scientific Programming · doi:10.1155/2018/4832972 · Cited by 135
RECOD Titans at ISIC Challenge 2017Preprint
Menegola, A., Tavares, J., Fornaciali, M. S., Li, L. T., Avila, S., & Junior, E. A. D. V. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04819 · Cited by 123
Efficient and Accurate Arbitrary-Shaped Text Detection with Pixel Aggregation NetworkPreprint
Wang, W., Xie, E., Song, X., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.05900 · Cited by 75
A Compact DNN: Approaching GoogLeNet-Level Accuracy of Classification and Domain Adaptation
Wu, C., Wen, W., Afzal, T., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., & Li, H. H. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.88 · Cited by 60
Wang, J., Luo, L., Wei, Y., & Zhu, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2020.3006324 · Cited by 54
Improved Center and Scale Prediction-Based Pedestrian Detection Using Convolutional Block
Kim, D.-G., Park, S., Kang, D., & Paik, J. (2019) · International Conference on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/icce-berlin47944.2019.8966154 · Cited by 24
Multi-Scale Target Detection Algorithm Based on Attention Mechanism
Moran, 鞠. J., Jiangning, 罗. L., Zhongbo, 王. W., & Haibo, 罗. L. (2020) · Acta Optica Sinica · doi:10.3788/aos202040.1315002 · Cited by 16
Split-Attention Multiframe Alignment Network for Image Restoration
Yu, Y., Liu, M., Feng, H., Xu, Z., & Li, Q. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2967028 · Cited by 15
A Hybrid SVM-QPSO Model Based Ceramic Tube Surface Defect Detection Algorithm
Xiao-Cong, L. (2014) · International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application (ISDEA) · doi:10.1109/isdea.2014.15 · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Bo, 2019, Knowledge of ultra-high-strength steel used in aerospace and other industries, Heat Treat., 34, 61
- Zhang, 2019, Ultrasound image defect classification based on genetic algorithm optimized support vector machine, Acta Metrol., 40, 887
- Xu, 2019, A random forest classification algorithm for polarized SAR images with comprehensive multi-features, J. Remote Sens., 23, 685
- Wu, 2000, Machine vision and nondestructive inspection of steel plate surface defects, Nondestruct. Test., 22, 13
- Guo, 2013, Surface defect automatic detection algorithm based on principal component analysis, Comput. Eng., 39, 216
- Liu, 2019, Improved YOLOV3 target recognition algorithm based on adaptive eged optimization, Microelectron. Comput., 36, 59
- Rosebrock, 2017, Deep Learning for Computer Vision with Python Practitioner Bundle, Md. PyImage Search, 1, 57
- Akiba, T., Suzuki, S., and Fukuda, K. (2017). Extremely large minibatch SGD: Training ResNet-50 on ImageNet in 15 minutes. arXiv.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Steel Surface Defect Recognition: A Survey
Wen, X., Shan, J., He, Y., & Song, K. (2022) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings13010017 · Cited by 210
Deep learning methods for object detection in smart manufacturing: A survey
Ahmad, H. M., & Rahimi, A. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.011 · Cited by 196
Chen, H., Du, Y., Fu, Y., Zhu, J., & Zeng, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3238698 · Cited by 134
Surface defect detection of industrial components based on vision
Chen, Z., Feng, X., Liu, L., & Jia, Z. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49359-9 · Cited by 64
TraCon: A Novel Dataset for Real-Time Traffic Cones Detection Using Deep Learning
Katsamenis, I., Karolou, E. E., Davradou, A., Protopapadakis, E. E., Doulamis, A. D., Doulamis, N. D., & Kalogeras, D. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17601-2_37 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Tian, X., Liu, X., Liu, Y., & Shi, X.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University (CN)
- Nankai University (CN)
- China National Heavy Duty Truck Group (China) (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tian, Xincheng
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-01-14
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 834
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206765025
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 19
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Keywords
- industrial defect detection, steel surface defects, two-stage detection framework, InceptionResNetV2, CBAM attention mechanism, defect classification, NEU-DET dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
