Cited by 42Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsControl Systems and Identification

An Improved Gated Recurrent Unit Neural Network for State-of-Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Battery

Open access
Chen, Jianlong, Lu, Chenlei, Chen, Cong, Cheng, Hangyu, Xuan, Dongji·2022·Applied Sciences

Abstract

State-of-charge (SOC) estimation of lithium-ion battery is a key parameter of the battery management system (BMS). However, SOC cannot be obtained directly. In order to predict SOC accurately, we proposed a recurrent neural network called gated recurrent unit network that is based on genetic algorithm (GA-GRU) in this paper. GA was introduced to optimize the key parameters of the model, which can improve the performance of the proposed network. Furthermore, batteries were tested under four dynamic driving conditions at five temperatures to establish training and testing datasets. Finally, the proposed method was validated on dynamic driving conditions and compared with other deep learning methods. The results show that the proposed method can achieve high accuracy and robustness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app12052305

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Air Quality Guidelines: Global update 2005: Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, and Sulfur Dioxide. Indian J. Med. Res. 2007, 4, 492-493.
  2. A Simplified Version of the Federal Urban Driving Schedule for Electric Vehicle Battery Testing. 1988. Available online: https: //www.osti.gov/biblio/6572201-simplified-version-federal-urban-driving-schedule-electric-vehicle-battery-testing (accessed on 13 January 2022).

Authors
Chen, J., Lu, C., Chen, C., Cheng, H., & Xuan, D.
Affiliations
Wenzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xuan, Dongji
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-22
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
2305
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213385733
Cited by
42
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Dongji Xuan (2018ZG007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
state of charge estimation, lithium-ion batteries, gated recurrent unit, genetic algorithm parameter optimization, battery management systems, temperature effects, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review