The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0: Overview, Models, and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
In the era of the fourth industrial revolution, several concepts have arisen in parallel with this new revolution, such as predictive maintenance, which today plays a key role in sustainable manufacturing and production systems by introducing a digital version of machine maintenance. The data extracted from production processes have increased exponentially due to the proliferation of sensing technologies. Even if Maintenance 4.0 faces organizational, financial, or even data source and machine repair challenges, it remains a strong point for the companies that use it. Indeed, it allows for minimizing machine downtime and associated costs, maximizing the life cycle of the machine, and improving the quality and cadence of production. This approach is generally characterized by a very precise workflow, starting with project understanding and data collection and ending with the decision-making phase. This paper presents an exhaustive literature review of methods and applied tools for intelligent predictive maintenance models in Industry 4.0 by identifying and categorizing the life cycle of maintenance projects and the challenges encountered, and presents the models associated with this type of maintenance: condition-based maintenance (CBM), prognostics and health management (PHM), and remaining useful life (RUL). Finally, a novel applied industrial workflow of predictive maintenance is presented including the decision support phase wherein a recommendation for a predictive maintenance platform is presented. This platform ensures the management and fluid data communication between equipment throughout their life cycle in the context of smart maintenance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 · Cited by 4,276 · cited 1×
“Although some of them have been studied for a long time, they are not yet ripe for mass industrial deployment [13].”
BackgroundRemaining useful life estimation – A review on the statistical data driven approaches
Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., & Zhou, D.-H. (2011) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.018 · Cited by 2,162
A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance
Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. D. P., Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. S. (2019) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024 · Cited by 1,576
Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034 · Cited by 1,352
Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review
Zonta, T., da Costa, C. A., da Rosa Righi, R., de Lima, M. J., da Trindade, E. S., & Li, G. P. (2020) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106889 · Cited by 1,302
Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review
Peng, Y., Dong, M., & Zuo, M. J. (2010) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2482-0 · Cited by 735
Challenges in deploying machine learning: A survey of case studies
Paleyes, A., Urma, R.-G., & Lawrence, N. D. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3533378 · Cited by 638
Big data analytics for intelligent manufacturing systems: A review
Wang, J., Xu, C., Zhang, J., & Zhong, R. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.005 · Cited by 603
Neumann, W. P., Winkelhaus, S., Grosse, E. H., & Glock, C. H. (2021) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107992 · Cited by 583
Predictive Maintenance and Intelligent Sensors in Smart Factory: Review
Pech, M., Vrchota, J., & Bednář, J. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041470 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Achouch, M., Dimitrova, M., Ziane, K., Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S., Dhouib, R., Ibrahim, H., & Adda, M.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-08-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 8081
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4291366336
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 62.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0: Overview, Models, and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/app12168081
- The paper
- Achouch, M., Dimitrova, M., Ziane, K., Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S., Dhouib, R., Ibrahim, H., & Adda, M. (2022). On Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0: Overview, Models, and Challenges. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.